Case Study: Nicola – Class II Mandibular Deficiency with Asymmetry

  • Presentation: Mixed dentition with significant overjet, 70% deep overbite, and 2-3mm lower midline deviation.

  • Diagnosis: Class II mesial step molar relationship and skeletal mandibular deficiency with asymmetry (larger left condyle).

  • Treatment: Fixed appliances with a spring-loaded Class II corrector using differential activation to guide asymmetric growth.

    • This was a mandibular deficiency, it needed to be moved forward
    • They activate the right side more in order to try and correct the assymetry, otherwise it would need to be orthognathic surgery
  • -Spring is connected to the upper molars, it will stabilize them, that way you don’t move one side more than the other side

  • Outcome: Corrected anterior relationship and aligned midlines; monitored for late growth.

Case Study: Anterior Spacing with Occlusal Cant

  • Presentation: Class I molar relationship with generalized spacing and deep overbite..
    • Quite a few anterior spaces
  • Treatment: Fixed appliance therapy focusing on vertical control to prevent excessive overbite closure while maintaining Class I engagement.

Case Study: Severe Crowding with Extractions

  • Presentation: Adult patient with 10mm arch length discrepancy (no growth remaining).
  • Treatment: Extraction of upper first premolars and one lower incisor to achieve stable alignment and minimize profile changes.

Case Study: Impacted Maxillary Canines – Early Intervention

Presentation: 8-9-year-old patient with unerupted canines identified on radiograph. Management: Extraction of primary canines (C’s) to open space may allow spontaneous eruption if the permanent canine angulation is <30° to the lateral incisor root. Angulation Threshold: If the canine is >90° to the lateral incisor root, spontaneous eruption is unlikely (<10% probability); surgical exposure and orthodontic traction required. Goal: Early intervention prioritizes preventing resorption of lateral incisor roots over achieving perfect alignment. .

Case Study: Canines Replacing Missing Lateral Incisors

Presentation: Patient missing maxillary lateral incisors with impacted or palatally positioned canines. Treatment: Extraction of contralateral lateral incisor (if present) for symmetry; surgical exposure of canines with gold chain traction. Mechanics: Canines guided into lateral incisor positions using cantilevers; final reshaping (flattening cusps) mimics lateral incisor morphology. Outcome: A Class II molar relationship is accepted to achieve anterior aesthetics. .

Case Study: Thumb Sucking and Open Bite Malocclusion

Etiology: Persistent thumb sucking blocks anterior eruption (open bite) and allows posterior over-eruption (clockwise mandibular rotation). You also have imbalance of the tngue and MOMs causing a cross-bite Treatment Protocol: Crib appliance (palatal barrier) for habit cessation; Quad helix or Rapid Maxillary Expander (RME) for transverse correction. Vertical Control: High-pull headgear blocks maxillary posterior extrusion to allow counter-clockwise mandibular rotation; surgical posterior maxillary impaction (Lefort I) is the adult alternative. Adult Open bite:

Case Study: Anterior Crossbite with Functional Shift ()

Presentation: Retroclined maxillary central incisors and edge-to-edge posterior occlusion causing a mandibular shift. > Treatment: Fixed appliances with Class III elastics to procline upper incisors. Once passed edge-to-edge, the lower incisors “step” forward naturally, stabilizing the TMJ. As long as we can procline the central incisors they will be edige to edge, as long as they pass a little bit the problem is solve

.

Case Study: Bilateral Mandibular Retraction using Bone Plates (TADs)

Indication: Class III malocclusion requiring en masse distalization without extractions. ==Technique: L-shaped bone plates screwed to the bilateral ramus provide absolute anchorage for retracting the entire lower dental arch.

Case Study: Severe Mandibular Deficiency – Distraction Osteogenesis

Indication: Skeletal deformity exceeding orthognathic surgery limits (>12mm movement). Procedure: Bilateral mandibular osteotomy with a distraction device activated at 1mm per day to stretch bone and form a callus. Risks: Nerve/muscle stretching and high relapse rates if the consolidation period is insufficient; maximum safe activation is 20-25mm..

Anterior Cross-bite causing trauma:

Case: Ectopic canine

  • At this stage you should remove the C’s
  • You also have to do lots of follow up to prevent root resoprtion
  • but the angulation is too high you need surgical exposure