**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
---
**Pulp, Root Canal and**
**Periapical Conditions**
**- Part 1**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**BDSc, MDS, FRACDS(Endo), FPFA, FADI, FICD, FACD, FIADT**
**Specialist Endodontist**
**Winthrop Professor of Clinical Dentistry**
**UWA Dental School**
**The University of Western Australia**
SEEK WISDOM
**ORAL HEALTH CENTRE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA**
---
**General Principles for Treating <u>ALL</u> Conditions / Diseases:**
**1.** **IDENTIFY** the disease and its cause
**2.** **REMOVE** the CAUSE of the disease
**3.** **TREAT** the EFFECT of the disease
**4.** **PREVENT** further disease and complications
**5.** **RESTORE** to normal function
**6.** **MONITOR** healing and stability over time
---
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
**Page 1**
#### Universal Clinical Management Principles
1. **IDENTIFY** the disease and its cause
2. **REMOVE** the CAUSE of the disease
3. **TREAT** the EFFECT of the disease
4. **PREVENT** further disease and complications
5. **RESTORE** to normal function
6. **MONITOR** healing and stability over time
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
Principles for Treating ENDODONTIC Conditions / Diseases:
1. IDENTIFY the disease and its cause
History, examination, diagnosis & identify the cause(s)
2. REMOVE the CAUSE of the disease
Remove cause(s) - restorations, caries, cracks, etc
3. TREAT the EFFECT of the disease
Clean the canal - remove bacteria, debris
Medicate canal - modify periapical response
4. PREVENT further disease and complications
Root canal filling and coronal restoration
5. RESTORE to normal function
Coronal restoration
6. MONITOR healing and stability over time
Review 6 months, 3 years, 5 years, etc
Hence, it is ESSENTIAL to understand
the disease processes involved
and what causes them
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 2
#### Endodontic Treatment Protocols
1. **IDENTIFY the disease and its cause**
- History, examination, diagnosis & identify the cause(s)
2. **REMOVE the CAUSE of the disease**
- Remove cause(s) - restorations, caries, cracks, etc
3. **TREAT the EFFECT of the disease**
- Clean the canal - remove bacteria, debris
- Medicate canal - modify periapical response
4. **PREVENT further disease and complications**
- Root canal filling and coronal restoration
5. **RESTORE to normal function**
- Coronal restoration
6. **MONITOR healing and stability over time**
- Review 6 months, 3 years, 5 years, etc
#### Clinical Rationale
It is essential to understand the disease processes involved and what causes them to effectively apply these principles.
![]()
A presentation slide titled 'Principles for Treating ENDODONTIC Conditions / Diseases' listing six key steps for treatment, ranging from identifying the disease to monitoring healing over time.
![]()
A second presentation slide displaying the same principles but featuring a large black overlay box in the center that emphasizes the essential need to understand disease processes, partially obscuring steps 3 and 4.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 3
The First Two Steps to Diagnose Any Condition / Disease
1. You must UNDERSTAND the CONDITION (or the disease process)
* Pulp, root canal and peri-radicular conditions are PROGRESSIVE
* i.e. They CHANGE over time - generally become worse or more severe
* Hence you must also UNDERSTAND how they CHANGE over time
* And you must be able to RECOGNIZE the DIFFERENT stages
2. You must also UNDERSTAND the CAUSE(S) of the condition / disease
* And IDENTIFY them during your examination
* So you can REMOVE them during treatment
* Remember:
* Pulps do not become inflamed for no reason !!!
* Pulps do not die for no reason !!!
```mermaid
graph TD
subgraph Causes
A1[Caries / Decay] --> B
A2[Marginal Gaps under Restorations] --> B
A3[Cracks / Fractures] --> B
end
B[Bacteria and Nutrients penetrate through the tooth via Dentine Tubules] --> C
subgraph Internal_Process
C[Bacteria in the Root Canal System<br/>i.e. root canal, dentine tubules, etc] --> D[Bacterial Endotoxins<br/>NB: Bacteria exit only occasionally]
end
D --> E[Inflammatory Response confines endotoxins and bacteria from spreading]
subgraph Periapical_Response
E --> F[Granuloma<br/>i.e. Apical Periodontitis - Inflammatory Cells etc.]
F --> G[Apical Inflammatory Root Resorption]
F --> H[Bone Resorption creates a Periapical Radiolucency<br/>i.e. space for the inflammatory response]
end
```
#### The First Two Steps to Diagnose Any Condition / Disease
1. **Understand the Condition (or the disease process)**
- Pulp, root canal, and peri-radicular conditions are **progressive**.
- They change over time, generally becoming more severe.
- You must understand how they change and recognize the different stages.
2. **Understand the Cause(s) of the condition / disease**
- Identify causes during examination to remove them during treatment.
- Important principles:
- Pulps do not become inflamed for no reason.
- Pulps do not die for no reason.
#### Pathogenesis Flowchart
| Stage | Description |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Causes** | Caries / Decay, Marginal Gaps under Restorations, Cracks / Fractures |
| **Penetration** | Bacteria and Nutrients penetrate through the tooth via Dentine Tubules |
| **Internal Process** | Bacteria in the Root Canal System (canal, tubules, etc.) produce Bacterial Endotoxins (NB: Bacteria exit only occasionally) |
| **Response** | Inflammatory Response confines endotoxins and bacteria from spreading |
| **Periapical Response** | **Granuloma**: Apical Periodontitis (Inflammatory Cells, etc.) leading to:<br>1. Apical Inflammatory Root Resorption<br>2. Bone Resorption (creates a Periapical Radiolucency/space for the inflammatory response) |
![]()
A detailed cross-sectional diagram of a tooth illustrating Pulp, Root Canal and Periapical Conditions, labeling causes like Caries and Fractures, and pathological processes such as bacterial invasion, inflammation, Granuloma formation, and Bone Resorption.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**Diagnosis**
Need to assess & record <u>FOUR</u> things:
1. The <b>TOOTH</b>
2. The state of the <b>PULP</b>
- or the <b>ROOT CANAL SYSTEM</b>
(if no pulp present – e.g. if pulpless; if previous RCF)
3. The state of the <b>PERIAPICAL TISSUES</b>
4. The <b>CAUSE(S)</b> of the disease(s)
**2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023**
Page 4
#### Diagnostic Assessment Requirements
To reach a diagnosis, you must assess and record four specific elements:
1. **The TOOTH**
2. **The state of the PULP**
- Or the **ROOT CANAL SYSTEM** (if the pulp is not present, e.g., pulpless or previous root canal filling)
3. **The state of the PERIAPICAL TISSUES**
4. **The CAUSE(S) of the disease(s)**
![]()
A schematic diagram illustrating pulp, root canal, and periapical conditions. It depicts how bacteria and nutrients penetrate a tooth via dentine tubules, causing caries and highlighting issues like marginal gaps under restorations, fractures, and cracks.
The user wants me to extract text from the provided image, which appears to be a slide from a presentation.
The image contains two main sections: a "Diagnosis" slide and a "Classifications" slide.
**Slide 1: Diagnosis**
- Title: "Diagnosis" (Yellow text)
- Bullet points:
- "Requires a classification" (Cyan text)
- "The classification must be:" (Cyan text)
- Sub-points (Yellow squares):
- "Possible to use clinically"
- "i.e. Based on information that can be obtained via a clinical examination, radiographs and tests" (Yellow text, indented)
- "Based on changes that occur in the tissues"
- "i.e. Meaningful !!!" (Yellow text, indented)
- "Able to be used determine the management options for the patient"
- "Used universally - ideally"
- There is a bracket connecting the last two sub-points to "i.e. Useful !!!"
- There is a black box on the right with yellow text:
- "Possible"
- "Meaningful"
- "Useful"
**Slide 2: Classifications**
- Title: "Classifications" (Yellow text)
- Left box: "Summary of classifications from 5 textbooks" (Cyan text in black box)
- Right box (Image): "Clinical Endodontics A Textbook Leif Tronstad Second Revised Edition Thieme" (Cover image)
- Table: "Table 4.1 Clinical diagnostic systems as presented in textbooks on endodontics"
- Columns: Tronstad, Walton & Torabinejad, Ingle & Beveridge, Cohen & Burns, Grossman
- Rows are divided into Pulpal Diagnosis and Periapical Diagnosis.
**Table Content Extraction:**
- Headers: Tronstad, Walton & Torabinejad, Ingle & Beveridge, Cohen & Burns, Grossman
- Pulpal Diagnosis Section:
- Row 1: Healthy pulp, Normal, No mention, No mention, Normal
- Row 2: Asymptomatic pulpitis, Reversible pulpitis, Incipient acute pulpalgia, Reversible pulpitis, Hyperemia Asymptomatic (chronic) / Reversible pulpitis Symptomatic (acute) - wait, let's look closer. It looks like:
- Tronstad: Asymptomatic pulpitis
- Walton: Reversible pulpitis
- Ingle: Incipient acute pulpalgia
- Cohen: Reversible pulpitis
- Grossman: Hyperemia Asymptomatic (chronic) / Reversible pulpitis Symptomatic (acute) - actually, looking at the layout, it seems grouped.
- Let's re-read carefully.
- Row "PULPAL DIAGNOSIS" is a vertical header.
- Sub-row: Asymptomatic pulpitis (Tronstad), Reversible pulpitis (Walton), Incipient acute pulpalgia (Ingle), Reversible pulpitis (Cohen), Hyperemia Asymptomatic (chronic) [Grossman].
- Next line under Grossman: Reversible pulpitis Symptomatic (acute).
- Next Sub-row: Symptomatic pulpitis (Tronstad), Irreversible pulpitis (Walton), Moderate & advanced Acute pulpalgia Chronic pulpalgia (Ingle), Irreversible pulpitis (Cohen), Irreversible pulpitis Acute Chronic Asymp. with pulp exposure (Grossman).
- Next row: (Empty Tronstad), Hyperplastic pulpitis (Walton), Hyperplastic pulposis (Ingle), (Empty Cohen), Hyperplastic pulpitis (Grossman).
- Next row: Necrotic pulp (Tronstad), Necrosis (Walton), Necrosis (Ingle), Necrosis (Cohen), Necrosis (Grossman).
- Periapical Diagnosis Section:
- Vertical header "PERIAPICAL DIAGNOSIS".
- Row 1: Normal (Tronstad), Normal (Walton), Normal (Ingle), Normal (Cohen), Normal (Grossman).
- Row 2: Symptomatic apical periodontitis (Tronstad), Acute apical periodontitis (Walton), Acute apical periodontitis (Ingle), Acute apical periodontitis (Cohen), Acute apical periodontitis (vital and nonvital) (Grossman).
- Row 3: Asymptomatic apical periodontitis (Tronstad), Chronic apical periodontitis (Walton), Chronic apical periodontitis (Ingle), Chronic apical periodontitis (Cohen), Granuloma (Grossman).
- Row 4: Apical periodontitis with abscess (Tronstad), Suppurative apical periodontitis (Walton), Suppurative apical periodontitis (Ingle), Suppurative apical periodontitis (Cohen), Chronic alveolar Abscess (if fistula is present) (Grossman).
- Row 5: Apical periodontitis with fistula (Tronstad), Acute apical abscess (Walton), Acute apical abscess (Ingle), Acute apical abscess (Cohen), Acute alveolar abscess (Grossman).
- Row 6: (Empty Tronstad), (Empty Walton), Phoenix abscess (Ingle), Phoenix abscess (Cohen), (Empty Grossman).
- Row 7: (Empty Tronstad), (Empty Walton), Apical cyst (Ingle), Apical cyst (Cohen), Cyst (Grossman).
- Row 8: Condensing apical periodontitis (Tronstad), Condensing osteitis (Walton), Apical condensing osteitis (Ingle), Periapical osteosclerosis (Cohen), Condensing osteitis (Grossman).
**Footer:**
- 2nd Year DMD - 2023
- Page 5
**Formatting:**
- Use Markdown.
- Bold text for colored headers/main points.
- Table for the classification chart.
- Image tag for the textbook cover.
Let's refine the table structure. It's a complex table. I will use a standard HTML table.
**Refining Table Rows:**
- Header: Tronstad | Walton & Torabinejad | Ingle & Beveridge | Cohen & Burns | Grossman
- Row: Healthy pulp | Normal | No mention | No mention | Normal
- Row (Pulpal Diag): Asymptomatic pulpitis | Reversible pulpitis | Incipient acute pulpalgia | Reversible pulpitis | Hyperemia Asymptomatic (chronic)
- Row: | | | | Reversible pulpitis Symptomatic (acute) -> Wait, looking closely at Grossman column, it lists: "Hyperemia Asymptomatic (chronic)" then below it "Reversible pulpitis Symptomatic (acute)". This corresponds to the "Asymptomatic pulpitis" row generally, but Grossman splits it. Let's just transcribe the text block.
- Row: Symptomatic pulpitis | Irreversible pulpitis | Moderate & advanced Acute pulpalgia Chronic pulpalgia | Irreversible pulpitis | Irreversible pulpitis Acute Chronic Asymp. with pulp exposure
- Row: | Hyperplastic pulpitis | Hyperplastic pulposis | | Hyperplastic pulpitis
- Row: Necrotic pulp | Necrosis | Necrosis | Necrosis | Necrosis
- Row (Periapical Diag): Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal
- Row: Symptomatic apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis (vital and nonvital)
- Row: Asymptomatic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Granuloma
- Row: Apical periodontitis with abscess | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Chronic alveolar Abscess (if fistula is present)
- Row: Apical periodontitis with fistula | Acute apical abscess | Acute apical abscess | Acute apical abscess | Acute alveolar abscess
- Row: | | Phoenix abscess | Phoenix abscess |
- Row: | | Apical cyst | Apical cyst | Cyst
- Row: Condensing apical periodontitis | Condensing osteitis | Apical condensing osteitis | Periapical osteosclerosis | Condensing osteitis
Wait, let's look at the "Apical periodontitis with fistula" row.
Tronstad: "Apical periodontitis with fistula"
Walton: "Acute apical abscess"
Ingle: "Acute apical abscess" then "Phoenix abscess" below it.
Cohen: "Acute apical abscess" then "Phoenix abscess" below it.
Grossman: "Acute alveolar abscess"
Actually, looking at the grid lines:
Row: "Apical periodontitis with abscess" (Tronstad) -> "Suppurative apical periodontitis" (Walton/Ingle/Cohen) -> "Chronic alveolar Abscess (if fistula is present)" (Grossman).
Row: "Apical periodontitis with fistula" (Tronstad) -> "Acute apical abscess" (Walton) -> "Acute apical abscess" (Ingle) -> "Acute apical abscess" (Cohen) -> "Acute alveolar abscess" (Grossman).
Below that row:
- Walton: (Empty)
- Ingle: "Phoenix abscess"
- Cohen: "Phoenix abscess"
- Grossman: (Empty)
Below that:
- Ingle: "Apical cyst"
- Cohen: "Apical cyst"
- Grossman: "Cyst"
Let's stick to a simple grid representation.
Also, need to include the top banner text: "Pulp and Root Canal Conditions Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO"
And bottom footer: "2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 5"
The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image... Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible".
So I will put the text outside tables in Markdown.
Let's assemble.
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
## Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
---
### Diagnosis
* **Requires a classification**
* **The classification must be:**
* **Possible to use clinically**
* *i.e. Based on information that can be obtained via a clinical examination, radiographs and tests*
* **Based on changes that occur in the tissues**
* *i.e. Meaningful !!!*
* **Able to be used determine the management options for the patient**
* **Used universally - ideally**
* *i.e. Useful !!!*
> * **Possible**
> * **Meaningful**
> * **Useful**
---
### Classifications
**Summary of classifications from 5 textbooks**
| Table 4.1 Clinical diagnostic systems as presented in textbooks on endodontics | | | | |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Tronstad** | **Walton & Torabinejad** | **Ingle & Beveridge** | **Cohen & Burns** | **Grossman** |
| **Healthy pulp** | Normal | No mention | No mention | Normal |
| **PULPAL DIAGNOSIS** | | | | |
| Asymptomatic pulpitis | Reversible pulpitis | Incipient acute pulpalgia | Reversible pulpitis | Hyperemia Asymptomatic (chronic)<br>Reversible pulpitis Symptomatic (acute) |
| Symptomatic pulpitis | Irreversible pulpitis | Moderate & advanced Acute pulpalgia Chronic pulpalgia | Irreversible pulpitis | Irreversible pulpitis Acute Chronic Asymp. with pulp exposure |
| | Hyperplastic pulpitis | Hyperplastic pulposis | | Hyperplastic pulpitis |
| Necrotic pulp | Necrosis | Necrosis | Necrosis | Necrosis |
| **PERIAPICAL DIAGNOSIS** | | | | |
| Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| Symptomatic apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis (vital and nonvital) |
| Asymptomatic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Granuloma |
| Apical periodontitis with abscess | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Chronic alveolar Abscess (if fistula is present) |
| Apical periodontitis with fistula | Acute apical abscess | Acute apical abscess | Acute apical abscess | Acute alveolar abscess |
| | | Phoenix abscess | Phoenix abscess | |
| | | Apical cyst | Apical cyst | Cyst |
| Condensing apical periodontitis | Condensing osteitis | Apical condensing osteitis | Periapical osteosclerosis | Condensing osteitis |
<img src="https://i.imgur.com/6XJzK0l.png" alt="Cover of Clinical Endodontics textbook by Leif Tronstad">
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
**Page 5**
#### Classification Criteria for Diagnosis
A clinical diagnosis requires a classification system that meets the following criteria:
- **Possible to use clinically**: Based on information obtained via clinical examination, radiographs, and tests.
- **Meaningful**: Based on actual changes that occur in the tissues.
- **Useful**: Able to determine management options for the patient and ideally used universally.
#### Clinical Diagnostic Systems Comparison
| Diagnostic Category | Tronstad | Walton & Torabinejad | Ingle & Beveridge | Cohen & Burns | Grossman |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Pulpal Diagnosis** | Healthy pulp | Normal | No mention | No mention | Normal |
| | Asymptomatic pulpitis | Reversible pulpitis | Incipient acute pulpalgia | Reversible pulpitis | Hyperemia Asymptomatic (chronic); Reversible pulpitis Symptomatic (acute) |
| | Symptomatic pulpitis | Irreversible pulpitis | Moderate & advanced Acute/Chronic pulpalgia | Irreversible pulpitis | Irreversible pulpitis (Acute, Chronic, Asymp. with exposure) |
| | | Hyperplastic pulpitis | Hyperplastic pulposis | | Hyperplastic pulpitis |
| | Necrotic pulp | Necrosis | Necrosis | Necrosis | Necrosis |
| **Periapical Diagnosis** | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| | Symptomatic apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis | Acute apical periodontitis (vital and nonvital) |
| | Asymptomatic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Chronic apical periodontitis | Granuloma |
| | Apical periodontitis with abscess | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Suppurative apical periodontitis | Chronic alveolar Abscess (if fistula present) |
| | Apical periodontitis with fistula | Acute apical abscess | Acute apical abscess | Acute apical abscess | Acute alveolar abscess |
| | | | Phoenix abscess | Phoenix abscess | |
| | | | Apical cyst | Apical cyst | Cyst |
| | Condensing apical periodontitis | Condensing osteitis | Apical condensing osteitis | Periapical osteosclerosis | Condensing osteitis |
![]()
This is a table titled 'Table 4.1 Clinical diagnostic systems as presented in textbooks on endodontics' which compares diagnostic terminology for pulpal and periapical conditions across five different endodontic textbooks.
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
# Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
## Classifications
**Summary of classifications from 13 textbooks and organizations**
**Table 1. Comparative terminology and classifications of pulp diseases used by various authors and organisations**
| World Health Organization¹ | Weise² | Ingle³ | Selezar & Bender⁴ | Cohen & Burns⁵ | Trostnad⁶ |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| (NOTE: Normal pulp not mentioned) | (NOTE: Normal pulp not mentioned) | Healthy pulp | (NOTE: Normal pulp not mentioned) | Within normal limits <br> Normal pulp <br> Calcific metamorphosis | Healthy pulp |
| **Pulpitis** <br> Initial (hyperaemia) <br> Acute <br> Suppurative (pulpal abscess) <br> Chronic ulcerative <br> Chronic hyperplastic (pulpal polyp) <br> Other unspecified <br> Pulpitis unspecified | **Pulpitis** <br> Hyperaemia <br> (reversible pulpitis) <br> Hyperesitive dentine <br> Hyperaemia <br> Painful pulpitis <br> Acute pulpitis <br> (subacute pulpitis) <br> Chronic pulpitis <br> Nonpainful pulpitis <br> Chronic ulcerative pulpitis <br> (no caries) <br> Chronic hyperplastic pulpitis (pulp polyp) | **Pulpitis** <br> Hyper-reactive pulpitis <br> Hyperesitivity <br> Hyperaemia <br> Acute pulpitis <br> Incipient <br> Moderate <br> Chronic pulpitis <br> Hyperplastic <br> polypous | **Pulpitis** <br> Incipient form of chronic pulpitis <br> Acute pulpitis <br> Chronic partial pulpitis with partial necrosis <br> Chronic total pulpitis with partial hyperplastic necrosis <br> Chronic partial pulpitis (hyperplastic form) | **Pulpitis** <br> Reversible <br> Asymptomatic <br> Hypersensitive pulpitis <br> Hyperplastic <br> Internal resorption <br> Canal calcification <br> Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis | **Pulpitis** <br> Asymptomatic pulpitis <br> Symptomatic <br> pulpitis |
| **Necrosis of the pulp** | **Pulp necrosis** | **Pulp necrosis** <br> Liquefaction <br> Slus | **Pulp necrosis** | **Necrosis** <br> Partial <br> Complete | **Necrotic pulp** |
| **Pulp degeneration** <br> Denticle <br> Pulpal calcification <br> Pulpal stome <br> Abnormal hard tissue formation in pulp <br> Secondary or irregular dentine | **Pulp degeneration** <br> Atrophy <br> Dystrophic calcification <br> Internal resorption | **Pulp degeneration** <br> Atrophic pulpous <br> Calcific pulpitis <br> Internal resorption | **Pulp degeneration** <br> Atrophic pulp <br> Dystrophic mineralization | | |
| **American Association of Endodontists Glossary⁷** | **Harry⁸** | **Walton & Torabinejad⁹** | **Grossman¹⁰** | **Castelli¹¹** | **Stock¹²** | **Bergenholtz¹³** |
| Normal pulp not mentioned | Normal pulp | (NOTE: Normal pulp not mentioned) | (NOTE: Normal pulp not mentioned) | Healthy pulp | Normal pulp | **Pulpa sana** |
| **Pulpitis** <br> Reversible pulpitis <br> Irreversible pulpitis | **Pulpitis** <br> Reversible <br> Irreversible pulpitis | **Pulpitis** <br> Reversible pulpitis <br> Irreversible pulpitis <br> Hyperplastic pulpitis | **Pulpitis** <br> **Polypitis** <br> Acute pulpitis <br> Chronic ulcerative pulpitis <br> Chronic hyperplastic pulpitis | **Pulpitis** <br> Hyperaemia <br> **Polypitis** <br> irreversible | **Pulpitis** <br> Reversible pulpitis <br> Irreversible pulpitis | **Pulpitis** |
| **Pulp necrosis** | **Necrosis** | **Pulpal necrosis** <br> Pulpal calcification <br> Internal (intracanal) resorption | **Necrosis** <br> Pulp degeneration <br> Calcific <br> Fibrous <br> Atrophic <br> Internal resorption | **Necrosis** | **Pulpal necrosis** <br> Internal resorption | **Necrosis pulpsae** |
**Abbott & Yu**
**ADJ 2007**
## Classifications
**Abbott & Yu - ADJ 2007**
**Abbott - Endod Topics 2004**
#### Comparative Terminology of Pulp Diseases
| Source | Normal Pulp Status | Pulpitis Classifications | Necrosis | Degeneration |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **WHO** | Not mentioned | Initial (hyperaemia), Acute, Suppurative, Chronic ulcerative, Chronic hyperplastic | Necrosis of the pulp | Denticle, Pulpal calcification, Secondary dentine |
| **Weise** | Not mentioned | Hyperaemia, Painful/Nonpainful pulpitis, Chronic ulcerative, Chronic hyperplastic | Pulp necrosis | Atrophy, Dystrophic calcification, Internal resorption |
| **Ingle** | Healthy pulp | Hyper-reactive, Hyperaemia, Acute (Incipient/Moderate), Chronic, Hyperplastic | Pulp necrosis (Liquefaction, Slus) | Atrophic pulpous, Calcific pulpitis, Internal resorption |
| **Seltzer & Bender** | Not mentioned | Incipient chronic, Acute, Chronic partial/total with partial necrosis, Chronic hyperplastic | Pulp necrosis | Atrophic pulp, Dystrophic mineralization |
| **Cohen & Burns** | Within normal limits; Calcific metamorphosis | Reversible, Asymptomatic, Hypersensitive, Hyperplastic, Internal resorption, Symptomatic irreversible | Necrosis (Partial/Complete) | Not listed |
| **Tronstad** | Healthy pulp | Asymptomatic, Symptomatic | Necrotic pulp | Not listed |
| **AAE Glossary** | Not mentioned | Reversible, Irreversible | Pulp necrosis | Not listed |
| **Harry** | Normal pulp | Reversible, Irreversible | Necrosis | Not listed |
| **Walton & Torabinejad** | Not mentioned | Reversible, Irreversible, Hyperplastic | Pulpal necrosis | Pulpal calcification, Internal resorption |
| **Grossman** | Not mentioned | Acute, Chronic ulcerative, Chronic hyperplastic | Necrosis | Calcific, Fibrous, Atrophic, Internal resorption |
| **Castelli** | Healthy pulp | Hyperaemia, Polypitis, Irreversible | Necrosis | Not listed |
| **Stock** | Normal pulp | Reversible, Irreversible | Pulpal necrosis | Internal resorption |
| **Bergenholtz** | Pulpa sana | Pulpitis | Necrosis pulpae | Not listed |
![]()
Table 1 presents a comparative terminology and classification of pulp diseases from 13 textbooks and organizations, including WHO, Weise, Ingle, and others, categorized by Pulpitis, Pulp necrosis, and Pulp degeneration.
![]()
Figure displaying a page titled 'Classification, diagnosis and clinical manifestations of apical periododontitis' by Paul V. Abbott from Endodontic Topics 2004, featuring an introduction and discussion of apical periodontitis.
The user wants me to extract text from the provided image, which contains two slides from a presentation.
I need to prioritize the image text (OCR) but use the PDF text for context where it helps clarify things.
I need to format tables in HTML.
I need to format flowcharts as tables.
I need to describe images with labels or sparse text using ` tags."
- However, the book cover "INGLE'S ENDODONTICS 7" has significant text. I should probably transcribe the text on it. But the prompt also says "Extract all of the text from this image".
- Let's look at the specific instruction: "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure".
- The text "Abbott, PV. Vol. 1, Chapter 8. 2019: 215 – 266." is a citation *for* the book. The book cover itself is an image. I will transcribe the citation text next to it. I will describe the book cover image.
- Actually, looking closer at the prompt: "Extract all of the text from this image... Format tables in HTML... if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description...".
- The book cover has title and authors. That's not "sparse text". It's the content of the figure. I will transcribe the citation text on the right. I will put the book cover image description in img tags. Wait, usually, if text is on an image, I should transcribe it.
- Let's re-read: "Extract all of the text from this image... if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure...".
- The book cover has "INGLE'S ENDODONTICS 7", "50TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION", "ILAN ROTSTEIN / JOHN I. INGLE". This is dense text. I will include it.
- The small journal articles on the top slide are too small to read fully, they are context images. I will mention them as images.
**Plan:**
1. Top Header info.
2. Slide 1 Content.
- Title "Classifications".
- Left Table (HTML).
- Right Table (HTML).
- References at bottom of tables.
3. Slide 2 Content.
- Title.
- Image of book (transcribing title/authors).
- Citation text next to it.
4. Footer info.
Let's double check the text in the tables.
Left Table:
- Table 2. Clinical classification of the status of the pulp and root canal conditions proposed by Abbott^14,15 and used in the School of Dentistry at The University of Western Australia^16
- Clinically Normal Pulp (based on clinical examination and test results)
- Reversible pulpitis – Acute – Chronic
- Irreversible pulpitis – Acute – Chronic
- Necrobiosis (Part of pulp necrotic & infected; the rest is irreversibly inflamed)
- Pulp necrosis – No sign of infection – Infected
- Pulpless, infected root canal system
- Degenerative changes
- Atrophy
- Pulpal canal calcification – partial – total
- Hyperplasia
- Internal resorption – Surface – Inflammatory – Replacement
- Previous root canal treatment
- No sign of infection
- Infected
- Technical standard (based on the radiographic appearance) – Adequate – Inadequate
- Other problems - e.g. perforation, missed canals, fractured instrument, etc.
Right Table:
- Table 2. A clinical classification of the status of the periradicular tissues.
- (a) Clinically normal periapical/periradicular tissues
- (b) Apical periodontitis - Acute: Primary Secondary (or acute exacerbation)
- Chronic: Granuloma Condensing osteitis
- (c) Periapical cyst - True cyst - Pocket cyst
- (d) Periapical abscess - Acute: Primary Secondary
- Chronic
- (e) Facial cellulitis
- (f) Extra-radicular infection
- (g) Foreign body reaction
- (h) Periapical scar
- (i) External root resorption - Surface
- Inflammatory
- Replacement
- Invasive
- Pressure
- Orthodontic
- Physiological
The text "Abbott - Endod Topics 2004" and "Abbott & Yu - ADJ 2007" are in yellow boxes at the bottom.
Let's assemble.
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
## Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
### 2nd Year DMD - 2023
### Page 7
---
### Classifications
**Table 2. Clinical classification of the status of the pulp and root canal conditions proposed by Abbott<sup>14,15</sup> and used in the School of Dentistry at The University of Western Australia<sup>16</sup>**
| | |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Clinically Normal Pulp** | (based on clinical examination and test results) |
| **Reversible pulpitis** | – Acute<br>– Chronic |
| **Irreversible pulpitis** | – Acute<br>– Chronic |
| **Necrobiosis** | (Part of pulp necrotic & infected; the rest is irreversibly inflamed) |
| **Pulp necrosis** | – No sign of infection<br>– Infected |
| **Pulpless, infected root canal system** | |
| **Degenerative changes** | |
| • Atrophy | |
| • Pulpal canal calcification | – partial<br>– total |
| • Hyperplasia | |
| • Internal resorption | – Surface<br>– Inflammatory<br>– Replacement |
| **Previous root canal treatment** | |
| • No sign of infection | |
| • Infected | |
| • Technical standard (based on the radiographic appearance) | – Adequate<br>– Inadequate |
| • Other problems | - e.g. perforation, missed canals, fractured instrument, etc. |
*Abbott & Yu - ADJ 2007*
**Table 2. A clinical classification of the status of the periradicular tissues.**
| | |
| :--- | :--- |
| **(a) Clinically normal periapical/periradicular tissues** | |
| **(b) Apical periodontitis - Acute:** | Primary<br>Secondary (or acute exacerbation) |
| **- Chronic:** | Granuloma<br>Condensing osteitis |
| **(c) Periapical cyst** | - *True cyst*<br>- *Pocket cyst* |
| **(d) Periapical abscess - Acute:** | Primary<br>Secondary |
| **- Chronic** | |
| **(e) Facial cellulitis** | |
| **(f) Extra-radicular infection** | |
| **(g) Foreign body reaction** | |
| **(h) Periapical scar** | |
| **(i) External root resorption - Surface** | - *Inflammatory*<br>- *Replacement*<br>- *Invasive*<br>- *Pressure*<br>- *Orthodontic*<br>- *Physiological* |
*Abbott - Endod Topics 2004*
---
### Clinical Evaluation, Examination and Diagnosis of Endodontic Conditions
<img src="ingle's endodontics 7 cover" alt="Cover of Ingle's Endodontics 7th Edition, 50th Anniversary Edition by Ilan Rotstein and John I. Ingle" />
**Abbott, PV.**
Vol. 1, Chapter 8.
2019: 215 – 266.
#### Proposed Clinical Classification (Abbott)
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
| Condition | Details / Sub-types |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Clinically Normal Pulp** | Based on clinical examination and test results |
| **Reversible pulpitis** | Acute or Chronic |
| **Irreversible pulpitis** | Acute or Chronic |
| **Necrobiosis** | Part of pulp necrotic & infected; remainder irreversibly inflamed |
| **Pulp necrosis** | No sign of infection OR Infected |
| **Pulpless, infected system** | Root canal system is infected |
| **Degenerative changes** | Atrophy; Pulpal canal calcification (partial/total); Hyperplasia; Internal resorption (Surface, Inflammatory, Replacement) |
| **Previous RCT** | No sign of infection OR Infected; Technical standard (Adequate/Inadequate); Other problems (perforation, missed canals, etc.) |
**Periradicular Tissues Status**
| Category | Classification |
| :--- | :--- |
| **(a) Normal** | Clinically normal periapical/periradicular tissues |
| **(b) Apical periodontitis** | **Acute**: Primary, Secondary (acute exacerbation)<br>**Chronic**: Granuloma, Condensing osteitis |
| **(c) Periapical cyst** | True cyst or Pocket cyst |
| **(d) Periapical abscess** | **Acute**: Primary, Secondary<br>**Chronic** |
| **(e) Facial cellulitis** | Clinical manifestation of spreading infection |
| **(f) Extra-radicular** | Extra-radicular infection |
| **(g) Foreign body** | Foreign body reaction |
| **(h) Periapical scar** | Healing by fibrosis |
| **(i) External resorption** | Surface, Inflammatory, Replacement, Invasive, Pressure, Orthodontic, Physiological |
**Reference Source:**
Abbott, PV. "Clinical Evaluation, Examination and Diagnosis of Endodontic Conditions." *Ingle's Endodontics 7*, Vol. 1, Chapter 8. 2019: 215–266.
![]()
Table 2 showing the clinical classification of the status of the pulp and root canal conditions proposed by Abbott, listing categories such as Clinically Normal Pulp, Reversible and Irreversible pulpitis, Pulp necrosis, and technical standards.
![]()
Table 2 presenting a clinical classification of the status of the periradicular tissues, including conditions like Clinically normal periapical tissues, Apical periodontitis (Acute and Chronic), Periapical cyst, Periapical abscess, and various forms of external root resorption.
![]()
Cover image of the textbook 'INGLE'S ENDODONTICS 7', 50th Anniversary Edition, featuring an anatomical illustration of a tooth and authors Ilan Rotstein and John I. Ingle, accompanied by a citation to Abbott, PV. Vol. 1, Chapter 8. 2019: 215 – 266.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
# Progression of Diseases
<table>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="text-align:center; font-family: sans-serif;">Healthy Tissue</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px;">*** <span style="color: cyan;">Injury or stimulus</span></td>
<td style="text-align:center; font-size: 20px;">⬇</td>
<td style="color: orange;"><strong>Inflammation</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px;">*** <span style="color: red;">If no treatment</span></td>
<td style="text-align:center; font-size: 20px;">⬇</td>
<td style="color: cyan;"><strong>Necrosis</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align:center; font-size: 20px;">⬇</td>
<td style="color: magenta;"><strong>Infection</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td style="text-align:center; font-size: 20px;">⬇</td>
<td style="color: yellow;"><strong>Tissue Destruction</strong></td>
</tr>
</table>
# Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli
> Reparative dentine
> **Caries** (in image)
**2nd Year DMD - 2023** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **Page 8**
#### Progression of Diseases
- **Healthy Tissue**
- Injury or stimulus &rarr; **Inflammation**
- If no treatment &rarr; **Necrosis**
- &rarr; **Infection**
- &rarr; **Tissue Destruction**
#### Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli
- Reparative dentine
- **Caries** (Primary stimulus)
![]()
A flowchart diagram titled 'Progression of Diseases' illustrating the pathway from 'Healthy Tissue' through 'Inflammation', 'Necrosis', 'Infection', to 'Tissue Destruction' triggered by an injury or stimulus.
![]()
A microscopic photo showing a section of dental tissue, labeled with 'Caries' and an arrow pointing to 'Reparative dentine' as a reaction to injurious stimuli.
The user wants me to extract text from the provided image, which appears to be a slide from a dental presentation.
I need to:
1. **Transcribe the text** from the top and bottom of the page (header/footer).
2. **Transcribe the main content** of the two slides.
3. **Format the text** as closely as possible to the visual layout.
4. **Handle colors:** Text that is yellow in the image should be bold (as per the instruction "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold"). Wait, looking closely at the image, the main title "Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli" is yellow. The instructions say "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This is a bit ambiguous. Does "different" mean different from black? Or just distinct colors? Usually, in these tasks, color indicates emphasis. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". Let's assume yellow text = bold. The bullet points "Reparative dentine" and "Inflammation" are white/light grey. "Infection" is white. The green arrows are graphical elements. The labels "Caries" are in small boxes.
5. **Handle the images:** The instruction says "If the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." However, the text "Caries" is inside a box on the image. The prompt also says "Extract all of the text from this image... try to match the text formatting as much as possible".
* Let's look at the instruction again: "If the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags."
* But then it says "Extract all of the text from this image...".
* And "simlarily if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure".
* This is a conflict. The text "Caries" is a label. The text "Reparative dentine" is a list item.
* Let's look at the overall structure. It's two slides.
* Slide 1: Title "Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli" (Yellow). List: "Reparative dentine", "Inflammation". Image on right with label "Caries". Green arrow pointing to "Inflammation".
* Slide 2: Title "Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli" (Yellow). List: "Reparative dentine", "Inflammation", "Infection". Image on right with label "Caries". Green arrow pointing to "Infection".
* The instruction "Extract all of the text from this image... try to match the text formatting as much as possible" suggests I should transcribe the content.
* The instruction "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description..." applies if the *whole page* is just an image. Here, there is text content.
* However, for the specific image within the slide, I should probably just describe it or include the text if it's integral. The prompt says "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure". This is tricky.
* Let's look at the provided text extraction in the prompt's "PDF Text" section. It lists "Caries" and the bullet points.
* Let's try to transcribe the slide content as text, and treat the histology image as a figure description or just ignore the visual pixels and focus on the text associated with it.
* Actually, looking at the instruction "Extract all of the text from this image... use the pdf text for context...". This implies I should output the text.
* The instruction about images ("if the figure is an image only...") is likely for when there are no other text elements on the page. Here, the slide has text. So I will transcribe the text.
* Wait, the prompt says "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure". This is confusing. "Caries" is a label on the image. "Inflammation" points to it.
* Let's look at the provided "PDF Text" in the prompt again. It has "Caries" at the top and then the slide content.
* Let's stick to transcribing the slide text. The yellow title will be bold. The bullet points will be standard text.
* The green arrows indicate a relationship. I can use arrows in text like `--->`.
* The "Caries" label is distinct.
* Let's refine the plan:
* Header: Pulp and Root Canal Conditions (Left), Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO (Right).
* Slide 1:
* Title: **Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli** (Yellow -> Bold)
* Text:
* > Reparative dentine
* > Inflammation (Green arrow points to the image area)
* Image Label: Caries (Yellow text in black box)
* Slide 2:
* Title: **Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli** (Yellow -> Bold)
* Text:
* > Reparative dentine
* > Inflammation
* > Infection (Green arrow points to the image area)
* Image Label: Caries (Blue text)
* Footer: 2nd Year DMD - 2023 (Left), Page 9 (Right).
* Re-reading the specific image instruction: "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags."
* The images *inside* the slides are histology slides. They have labels "Caries".
* The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image".
* I will extract the text. I will not wrap the histology images in ` tags."
* This might apply to the *histology images* themselves if I were extracting just the image file. But I am extracting the *page*. The page contains text.
* Let's look at the "PDF Text" provided in the prompt again. It lists "Caries" at the very top, then the slide content. This suggests the OCR saw "Caries" separately.
* Actually, looking closely at the first slide, "Caries" is in a yellow box with black text? No, black box with yellow text.
* Second slide, "Caries" is just blue text on the image.
* I will include the text "Caries" in the transcription.
* One more check on the bold rule: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
* Yellow text: **Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli**, **Caries**.
* Blue text: **Caries**.
* Green text: There is no green text, only green arrows.
* White text: "Reparative dentine", "Inflammation", "Infection". These are on a dark blue background. They are technically a different color (white vs dark blue). But formatting standard body text as bold might look weird. However, strict adherence to "different colour -> bold" might mean I should bold them too.
* Let's look at the visual hierarchy. The yellow is definitely a title. The "Caries" labels are callouts. The white text is list items. I will bold the yellow and blue callouts ("Caries" and Title). I will leave the white list items as normal text, or perhaps bold if I want to be strict.
* Let's look at the provided "PDF Text" in the prompt. It just lists the text.
* Let's look at the instruction again: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This is a specific formatting instruction. I will interpret "different colour" as "non-black/white standard text" or "highlighted text". The yellow and blue are distinct. The white is standard for slide text. I'll stick to bolding the yellow and blue text to highlight the specific instruction application.
* Actually, let's look at the second slide. "Inflammation" and "Reparative dentine" are greyish/white. "Infection" is white.
* I will bold the Title and the "Caries" labels. I will leave the list items as normal text to maintain readability, as "different colour" likely implies *distinctive* color like the yellow title, not just white-on-blue contrast which is standard.
* Wait, looking at the very top of the image (the white part of the PDF page), the text "Pulp and Root Canal Conditions" and "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" are black.
* The footer text "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 9" are black.
* So, only the slide title and the "Caries" labels have distinct colors (Yellow/Blue).
* Structure:
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions** **Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
(Line)
**Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli**
- Reparative dentine
- Inflammation --> (Image with **Caries**)
(Line)
**Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli**
- Reparative dentine
- Inflammation
- Infection --> (Image with **Caries**)
(Line)
**2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 9**
* I need to be careful with the "Caries" location.
* Top slide: "Caries" is in a black box with yellow text.
* Bottom slide: "Caries" is blue text.
* I will combine these into the text flow.
* Let's try to group the slide content.
* Slide 1:
**Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli**
> Reparative dentine
> Inflammation
(Image: Histology with label **Caries**)
* Slide 2:
**Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli**
> Reparative dentine
> Inflammation
> Infection
(Image: Histology with label **Caries**)
* Wait, the prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image". It implies I should output the text string.
* I will format it to look like the slides.
* Re-reading the instruction about images: "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags."
* This instruction is tricky. The *histology images* are figures. They have labels ("Caries") and sparse text (none really, just the label).
* If I follow this strictly: I should NOT transcribe the histology details. I should just say ``.
* BUT, the prompt *also* says "Extract all of the text from this image... try to match the text formatting as much as possible".
* And "Prioritize image text".
* And the "PDF Text" provided in the prompt includes "Caries" as a distinct line, and the slide titles/bullets.
* It seems the user wants the text content of the slides. The histology image itself doesn't have extractable text other than the "Caries" label.
* So I will transcribe the text "Caries".
* I will treat the histology image as a visual element but since I can't generate images, and the prompt says "if the figure is an image only... DO NOT return anything other than a few word description... wrap in <img>", this might apply to the *slide's* embedded image.
* However, the prompt is asking to extract text *from the image provided* (which is a page containing slides).
* If I look at the whole page, it's a PDF page.
* I will extract the text. I will describe the images briefly if needed, but since the text "Caries" is present, I will include it.
* Actually, let's look at the instruction: "simlarily if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure".
* This suggests that if the *whole page* is just a figure with labels, don't transcribe.
* Here, the page has a header, footer, and two slides with bullet points. This is a text-heavy page. So I transcribe the text.
* The "Caries" text on the image *is* a label. But it's a standard OCR target. I will include it.
* Final check on colors:
* "Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli": Yellow -> Bold.
* "Caries" (top): Yellow -> Bold.
* "Caries" (bottom): Blue -> Bold.
* The rest is white/grey/black -> Normal.
* Let's construct the output.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
---
**Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli**
* **Reparative dentine**
* **Inflammation**
*(Green arrow pointing to the tissue)*
* **Caries** (Label in image)
---
**Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli**
* **Reparative dentine**
* **Inflammation**
* **Infection**
*(Green arrow pointing to the tissue)*
* **Caries** (Label in image)
---
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
**Page 9**
#### Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli
- Reparative dentine
- Inflammation
- **Caries** (Localized stimulus)
#### Progression of Pulp Reaction
- Reparative dentine
- Inflammation
- Infection
- **Caries** (Advancing stimulus)
![]()
A presentation slide titled 'Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli' listing 'Reparative dentine' and 'Inflammation' alongside a histological photo of tooth tissue labeled 'Caries' with a green arrow pointing to the inflamed pulp area.
![]()
A presentation slide titled 'Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli' listing 'Reparative dentine', 'Inflammation', and 'Infection' alongside a histological photo labeled 'Caries' with a green arrow pointing to a dark, infected area within the pulp tissue.
**Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli**
* Reparative dentine
* Inflammation
* Infection
* **Necrosis**
**Progression of Pulp Disease**
<table>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><b>Healthy Tissue</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>*** <i>Injury or stimulus</i></td>
<td>↓</td>
<td>e.g. <b>Avulsion, luxation, etc</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><b>Inflammation</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>*** <b>If no treatment</b></td>
<td>↓</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><b>Necrosis</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">↔ <b>Infection</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">↓</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><b>Tissue Destruction</b></td>
</tr>
</table>
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 10
#### Pulp Reactions to Injurious Stimuli
- Reparative dentine
- Inflammation
- Infection
- **Necrosis**
#### Progression of Pulp Disease Flow
1. **Healthy Tissue**
- Injury or stimulus (e.g., **Avulsion, luxation, etc.**)
2. **Inflammation**
- If no treatment
3. **Necrosis**
- &harr; **Infection**
4. **Tissue Destruction**
![]()
Microscopic view of dental tissue showing dentine (labeled D) and cellular components (labeled C), with a green arrow indicating the transition to necrosis as described in the adjacent text list.
![]()
Flowchart illustrating the progression of pulp disease, starting from healthy tissue, moving through injury/stimulus and inflammation, potentially leading to necrosis, infection, and finally tissue destruction.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"><i>Progression of Pulp Disease</i></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Normal Pulp</strong></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>*** Injury or stimulus</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Reversible Pulpitis</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Irreversible Pulpitis</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>*** If no treatment</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Partial Necrosis</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Necrosis</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><strong>Pulpless</strong></td>
<td><strong>+ Micro-organisms</strong></td>
</tr>
</table>
**Jansson et al Swed Dent J 1993; 17: 85-93**
* **Monkey premolars**
* **Pulps exposed, lacerated and infected with plaque**
* **After 10-14 days:**
* One group: ZO-E temp.
* Other group: left open
* **Examined histologically - 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10 months**
* **“Closed” group**
* 1 month - no pulp tissue left
* **“Open” group**
* 1 month - apical pulp still intact
* 2 months - no pulp tissue left
2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 11
#### Progression Pathways
- **Normal Pulp**
- **Injury or stimulus** leads to:
- **Reversible Pulpitis**
- **Irreversible Pulpitis**
- **If no treatment**:
- **Partial Necrosis**
- **Necrosis**
- **Pulpless** (+ Micro-organisms)
#### Research Context: Jansson et al (1993)
- **Study Model**: Monkey premolars (Pulps exposed, lacerated, and infected with plaque).
- **Timeline**: 10–14 days post-exposure.
- **Experimental Groups**:
- **"Closed" group** (ZO-E temporary): No pulp tissue remaining after 1 month.
- **"Open" group** (Left open):
- 1 month: Apical pulp still intact.
- 2 months: No pulp tissue remaining.
![]()
A flowchart diagram titled 'Progression of Pulp Disease' illustrating the pathological sequence from Normal Pulp to Pulpless. It details pathways involving injury, reversible/irreversible pulpitis, necrosis, and the influence of micro-organisms.
![]()
A histological micrograph showing tissue sections labeled 'C' and 'D', referenced in the Jansson et al. study regarding monkey premolars. The image illustrates the histological examination results for 'Closed' and 'Open' pulp groups over time.
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
## Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
**Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions**
* **Abbott, PV.**
* **2019: 215 - 266.**
* **Abbott & Yu**
* **ADJ 2007**
| **Category** | **Conditions / Details** |
| :--- | :--- |
| **NO SIGNS OF DISEASE:** | • **CLINICALLY NORMAL PULP** (Based on history, clinical examination, tests, radiographs, etc) |
| **PULPITIS:** | • **REVERSIBLE PULPITIS** - Acute<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- Chronic<br>• **IRREVERSIBLE PULPITIS** - Acute<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- Chronic |
| **PULP NECROSIS:** | • **PULP NECROBIOIS** (Part of pulp is necrotic & infected; the rest is irreversibly inflamed)<br>• **PULP NECROSIS with NO signs of Infection**<br>• **NECROTIC AND INFECTED PULP** |
| **PULPLESS TEETH:** | • **PULPLESS AND INFECTED ROOT CANAL SYSTEM**<br>• **TEETH WITH PREVIOUS ROOT CANAL TREATMENT**<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- Root-filled with **NO** signs of infection<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- Root-filled and infected<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- **Incomplete endodontic treatment\*** (e.g. treatment started elsewhere)<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;\* NOTE: Also specify whether the root canal system is infected or not<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- **Technical standard** (Based on the radiographic appearance)<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;➢ Adequate<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;➢ Inadequate<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- **Other problems** - specify the problem: e.g. Perforation, Untreated canal(s), Fractured instrument, Silver point, etc.) |
| **DEGENERATIVE CHANGES:** | • **PULP CANAL CALCIFICATION\*\*** - Partial<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- "**Complete**" (Based on radiographic appearance)<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;\*\* NOTE: Also specify the diagnosis/condition of the pulp or root canal system<br>• **PULP HYPERPLASIA** (NOTE: a form of pulpitis; specify the pulp status also)<br>• **INTERNAL RESORPTION** - Internal **SURFACE** Resorption<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- Internal **INFLAMMATORY** Resorption<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;- Internal **REPLACEMENT** Resorption |
---
# Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - I
* **Clinically Normal Pulp** (Based on examination and test results)
* **Reversible Pulpitis**
* Acute **
* Chronic
* **Irreversible Pulpitis**
* Acute **
* Chronic
* **Acute** = moderate - severe pain, recent onset, patient seeks relief
* **Chronic** = very mild or no pain, present for long time, no urgency
<br>
**2nd Year DMD - 2023** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&
#### Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions
- **No Signs of Disease**
- Clinically Normal Pulp (Based on history, clinical examination, tests, radiographs, etc.)
- **Pulpitis**
- Reversible Pulpitis (Acute or Chronic)
- Irreversible Pulpitis (Acute or Chronic)
- **Pulp Necrosis**
- Pulp Necrobiosis (Partially necrotic/infected; remainder irreversibly inflamed)
- Pulp Necrosis with no signs of infection
- Necrotic and Infected Pulp
- **Pulpless Teeth**
- Pulpless and Infected Root Canal System
- Teeth with Previous Root Canal Treatment:
- Root-filled with no signs of infection
- Root-filled and infected
- Incomplete endodontic treatment (Specify infection status)
- Technical standard (Adequate or Inadequate based on radiographs)
- Other problems (Perforation, untreated canals, fractured instruments, etc.)
- **Degenerative Changes**
- Pulp Canal Calcification (Partial or "Complete")
- Pulp Hyperplasia (A form of pulpitis)
- Internal Resorption (Surface, Inflammatory, or Replacement)
#### Clinical Definitions
- **Acute**: Moderate to severe pain, recent onset, patient seeks relief.
- **Chronic**: Very mild or no pain, present for a long time, no urgency.
![]()
A table titled "Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions" detailing categories such as No Signs of Disease, Pulpitis, Pulp Necrosis, Pulpless Teeth, and Degenerative Changes with specific sub-conditions for each.
![]()
A diagram titled "Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - I" that outlines Clinically Normal Pulp, Reversible Pulpitis, and Irreversible Pulpitis within a red box, alongside definitions for Acute and Chronic pain conditions.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - I**
| | |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Clinically Normal Pulp**<br>*(Based on examination and test results)* | **Necrobiosis**<br>*(Part of the pulp is necrotic & infected plus the rest of the pulp is irreversibly inflamed)* |
| **Reversible Pulpitis**<br>- Acute **<br>- Chronic | **Pulp Necrosis**<br>- No sign of infection<br>- Infected |
| **Irreversible Pulpitis**<br>- Acute **<br>- Chronic | **Pulpless & infected Root Canal System** |
**Acute** = moderate-severe pain, recent onset, patient seeks relief
**Chronic** = v. mild or no pain, present for long time, no urgency
**Necrobiosis**
*(Louis Grossman - 1985)*
* Part of the pulp is necrotic and infected
* **PLUS**
* **The rest of the pulp is inflamed**
* **Pulp chamber -v- root canals**
* **One canal -v- other canal(s)**
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
**Page 13**
#### Classification Summary
- **Clinically Normal Pulp**
- **Reversible Pulpitis** (Acute/Chronic)
- **Irreversible Pulpitis** (Acute/Chronic)
- **Necrobiosis**
- **Pulp Necrosis** (Infected or Non-infected)
- **Pulpless & Infected Root Canal System**
#### Detailed View: Necrobiosis
*Definition (Grossman, 1985):* Part of the pulp is necrotic and infected, while the remaining pulp is inflamed.
- Can occur between the pulp chamber and root canals.
- Can occur between different canals in multi-rooted teeth.
![]()
A table-like slide titled 'Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - I' listing conditions such as Clinically Normal Pulp, Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, Necrobiosis, Pulp Necrosis, and Pulpless & infected Root Canal System.
![]()
A figure defining 'Necrobiosis' according to Louis Grossman (1985), featuring a dental radiograph (photo) on the left and text explaining that part of the pulp is necrotic and infected while the rest is inflamed.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
**Terminology**
**??? Necrobios is** **??? Partial Pulp Necrosis**
- **“Necrobios is” - more descriptive, meaningful, & useful**
- Since it reflects the two different tissue conditions that are present within the one pulp/tooth
- Indicates treatment is required - e.g. Endodontics or extraction
- **“Partial Pulp Necrosis” - does not require treatment**
- Unless the necrotic portion of the pulp is infected
- **-> In which case, the rest of the pulp is likely to be inflamed**
- o If not, then can not clinically determine if it is infected or not
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:cyan;"><em>Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - II</em></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="vertical-align:top;">
<strong>• Previous Endodontic Treatment</strong>
<ul>
<li>RF + No sign of infection</li>
<li>RF + Infected RCS</li>
<li>Incomplete RCT</li>
<li><strong>Technical standard **</strong>
<ul>
<li>-> Inadequate</li>
<li>-> Adequate</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Other problems **</strong>
<ul>
<li>e.g. perforation, fractured file, missed canal, etc.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="vertical-align:top;">
<strong>• Other Conditions</strong>
<ul>
<li>Atrophy</li>
<li>Pulp Canal Calcification <br> <strong>+ Diagnose the state of the pulp or the root canal</strong></li>
<li>Hyperplasia (pulp polyp) <br> <strong>A form of chronic irreversible pulpitis</strong></li>
<li>Internal Resorption
<ul>
<li>-> Surface</li>
<li>-> Inflammatory</li>
<li>-> Replacement</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center;"><strong>** based on radiographic appearance</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 14
#### Terminology Comparison
- **Necrobiosis**
- More descriptive and meaningful.
- Reflects two different tissue conditions within one tooth.
- Indicates treatment is required (Endodontics or extraction).
- **Partial Pulp Necrosis**
- Does not necessarily require treatment unless the necrotic portion is infected.
- If infected, the remaining pulp is likely inflamed.
#### Clinical Classification II
- **Previous Endodontic Treatment**
- RF + No sign of infection
- RF + Infected RCS
- Incomplete RCT
- Technical standard (Inadequate/Adequate)
- Other problems (Perforation, fractured file, missed canal)
- **Other Conditions**
- Atrophy
- Pulp Canal Calcification
- Hyperplasia (Pulp polyp) - A form of chronic irreversible pulpitis
- Internal Resorption (Surface, Inflammatory, Replacement)
![]()
A table titled 'Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - II' that categorizes conditions into 'Previous Endodontic Treatment' and 'Other Conditions', detailing sub-items like technical standards, pulp canal calcification, and internal resorption based on radiographic appearance.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**The Progression of Pulp Disease**
**Clinically Normal Pulp**
**The Progression of Pulp Disease**
**Clinically Normal Pulp**
| |
| :--- |
| + **TRAUMA** |
| (e.g. luxation, avulsion, etc) |
| **Pulp Necrosis** |
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
Page 15
#### Progression from Normal Pulp
- **Clinically Normal Pulp**
- **+ Trauma** (e.g., luxation, avulsion, etc.)
- Leads to: **Pulp Necrosis**
![]()
A slide titled "The Progression of Pulp Disease" showing a diagram with a box labeled "Clinically Normal Pulp" and empty bar graphs at the bottom corners, representing the initial state of the condition.
![]()
A flowchart diagram illustrating the progression of pulp disease, starting from "Clinically Normal Pulp," moving through "+ TRAUMA (e.g. luxation, avulsion, etc)," and leading to "Pulp Necrosis," indicated by orange arrows and boxes.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">The Progression of Pulp Disease</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><b>Clinically Normal Pulp</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>+ TRAUMA</b><br>(e.g. luxation, avulsion, etc)</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Pulp Necrosis</b></td>
<td><b>Necrotic and Infected Pulp</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>+ Micro-organisms</b></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><b>Pulpless and Infected</b><br><b>Root Canal System</b></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">The Progression of Pulp Disease</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Clinically Normal Pulp</b></td>
<td><b>Short-term irritation</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Acute Reversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 16
#### Trauma and Irritation Pathways
- **Pathway A: Trauma**
- Clinically Normal Pulp &rarr; **Pulp Necrosis**
- **+ Micro-organisms** &rarr; **Necrotic and Infected Pulp**
- &rarr; **Pulpless and Infected Root Canal System**
- **Pathway B: Irritation**
- Clinically Normal Pulp &rarr; **Short-term irritation** &rarr; **Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
![]()
A flowchart titled 'The Progression of Pulp Disease' illustrating how a clinically normal pulp can progress to pulp necrosis and infection through trauma and micro-organisms.
![]()
A second diagram titled 'The Progression of Pulp Disease' showing the pathway from a clinically normal pulp through short-term irritation to acute reversible pulpitis.
The user wants me to extract text from the provided image, which appears to be a slide or a page from a presentation.
I need to look at both the visual content (the diagrams) and the provided PDF text (which seems to be a raw dump).
The prompt asks me to prioritize image text.
The prompt asks me to format tables as HTML.
The prompt asks me to format flowcharts as tables.
The prompt asks me to use bold text for colored text (though the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold", looking at the image, there are distinct colors: Green for "Clinically Normal Pulp", Yellow/Orange for the conditions, Red for arrows, Blue/Cyan for the title). Wait, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This is a bit ambiguous. Usually, color implies emphasis. Let's look at the specific instruction: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
Actually, looking closely at the prompt: "Note that erros may occur with the pdf text, if it is obviously corrupted or error ridden text then ignore it !"
The provided PDF text lists things like "Necrobiosis", "Pulp Necrosis", "Necrotic and Infected Pulp", "Pulpless and Infected Root Canal System". These are NOT in the image. The image only shows the top part of the progression (up to Irreversible Pulpitis). The second slide in the image adds Micro-organisms and Irreversible Pulpitis.
So I need to stick strictly to what is in the *image*.
**Image Analysis:**
There are two black boxes containing flowcharts/diagrams.
Top Header: "Pulp and Root Canal Conditions", "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO"
Bottom Footer: "2nd Year DMD - 2023", "Page 17"
**Diagram 1 (Top Black Box):**
Title: "The Progression of Pulp Disease" (Cyan text)
Box 1: "Clinically Normal Pulp" (Green text, black background)
Box 2: "Short-term irritation" (Yellow text, brown background) -> Arrow points to Clinically Normal Pulp.
Box 3: "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text, black background) -> Arrow points from Clinically Normal Pulp.
Box 4: "Acute Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text, black background) -> Arrow points from Clinically Normal Pulp.
Box 5: "Long-term irritation" (Cyan text, brown background) -> Arrows point to Chronic Reversible Pulpitis and Acute Reversible Pulpitis.
Arrows connect everything.
**Diagram 2 (Bottom Black Box):**
Title: "The Progression of Pulp Disease" (Cyan text)
Box 1: "Clinically Normal Pulp" (Green text)
Box 2: "+ Micro-organisms" (Red text, grey background) -> Arrows pointing to Acute/Chronic Reversible Pulpitis.
Box 3: "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text)
Box 4: "Acute Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text)
Box 5: "Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text) -> Below Chronic Reversible.
Box 6: "Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text) -> Below Acute Reversible.
Arrows show progression.
**Refining the Table Structure:**
The prompt asks to format flowcharts as tables "as best as possible". I will try to represent the hierarchy.
**Top Section (Header):**
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
**Flowchart 1:**
The visual structure is a network.
Top: Clinically Normal Pulp
Right: Short-term irritation -> points to Clinically Normal Pulp.
Left/Right middle: Chronic Reversible Pulpitis <-> Acute Reversible Pulpitis.
Bottom middle: Long-term irritation -> points to the reversible pulpitises.
Arrows indicate reversibility back to normal.
Let's try to map this to a table structure or just text blocks. The prompt says "flowcharts as tables as best as possible". This is tricky for a non-linear flowchart. I will create a representation that captures the relationships.
**Flowchart 2:**
Similar structure but adds the lower irreversible stage.
Top: Clinically Normal Pulp
Right: + Micro-organisms -> points to reversible stages.
Middle: Chronic Reversible Pulpitis <-> Acute Reversible Pulpitis
Bottom: Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis <-> Acute Irreversible Pulpitis
Arrows go down from Reversible to Irreversible.
**Text Extraction & Formatting:**
- "Pulp and Root Canal Conditions" (Black)
- "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" (Black)
- "The Progression of Pulp Disease" (Cyan - bold)
- "Clinically Normal Pulp" (Green - bold)
- "Short-term irritation" (Yellow - bold)
- "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow - bold)
- "Acute Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow - bold)
- "Long-term irritation" (Cyan - bold)
- "+ Micro-organisms" (Red - bold)
- "Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" (Yellow - bold)
- "Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" (Yellow - bold)
Wait, the prompt says: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
- Cyan title -> Bold
- Green box -> Bold
- Yellow text -> Bold
- Cyan text (Long-term) -> Bold
- Red text -> Bold
**Footer:**
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 17
**Structure:**
I will present the header, then the first diagram, then the second diagram, then the footer. I will use a markdown table to simulate the layout of the diagram components.
**Diagram 1 Table:**
| | |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Clinically Normal Pulp** | **Short-term irritation** |
| **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** ↔ | **Acute Reversible Pulpitis** |
| ↓ ↑ | ↓ ↑ |
| **Long-term irritation** | |
Actually, the arrows are complex.
Top: **Clinically Normal Pulp**
Right of top: **Short-term irritation** (points to Normal)
Left/Right Middle: **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** ↔ **Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
Below Middle: **Long-term irritation** (points to Chronic and Acute Reversible)
Arrows go back to Normal.
Let's try a simpler table approach to list the nodes and their connections textually if a visual table is too hard.
"Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible"
Okay, I will try to make a table that looks like the diagram.
**Top Diagram Table:**
Row 1: [Clinically Normal Pulp] ... [Short-term irritation]
Row 2: [Chronic Reversible Pulpitis] <--> [Acute Reversible Pulpitis]
Row 3: [Long-term irritation]
**Bottom Diagram Table:**
Row 1: [Clinically Normal Pulp] ... [+ Micro-organisms]
Row 2: [Chronic Reversible Pulpitis] <--> [Acute Reversible Pulpitis]
Row 3: [Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis] <--> [Acute Irreversible Pulpitis]
Let's refine the colors.
- "The Progression of Pulp Disease" is Cyan. I'll make it bold and maybe use a span if possible, but standard markdown doesn't support color well without HTML. The prompt says "Format tables in HTML". So I can use HTML table cells with style.
- "Clinically Normal Pulp" is Green.
- "Short-term irritation" is Yellow text on Brown bg.
- "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" is Yellow text.
- "Acute Reversible Pulpitis" is Yellow text.
- "Long-term irritation" is Cyan text.
- "+ Micro-organisms" is Red text.
- "Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" is Yellow text.
- "Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" is Yellow text.
Wait, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". It doesn't explicitly say I *must* use HTML for color, just that different colors should be bold. But since I need to format tables in HTML, I can use HTML for the tables and apply bolding or color styles there.
Let's look at the specific text in the image again.
Top slide:
"The Progression of Pulp Disease" (Cyan)
"Clinically Normal Pulp" (Green text)
"Short-term irritation" (Yellow text, dashed red border)
"Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text)
"Acute Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text)
"Long-term irritation" (Cyan text, dashed red border)
Bottom slide:
"The Progression of Pulp Disease" (Cyan)
"Clinically Normal Pulp" (Green text)
"+ Micro-organisms" (Red text, dashed border)
"Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text)
"Acute Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text)
"Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text)
"Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" (Yellow text)
The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image... use the pdf text for context... Note that erros may occur with the pdf text...". The PDF text has "Necrobiosis", "Pulp Necrosis", etc. which are NOT in the image. So I ignore those.
I will construct the response.
Header:
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
Diagram 1:
A table representing the flow.
Row 1: **Clinically Normal Pulp** (Green) | **Short-term irritation** (Yellow)
Row 2: **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** (Yellow) <--> **Acute Reversible Pulpitis** (Yellow)
Row 3: (Arrow from Long-term irritation) | **Long-term irritation** (Cyan)
Diagram 2:
Row 1: **Clinically Normal Pulp** (Green) | **+ Micro-organisms** (Red)
Row 2: **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** (Yellow) <--> **Acute Reversible Pulpitis** (Yellow)
Row 3: **Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis** (Yellow) <--> **Acute Irreversible Pulpitis** (Yellow)
Wait, looking at the arrows in the second diagram:
"Micro-organisms" points to Acute Reversible and Chronic Reversible (and Clinically Normal).
Chronic Reversible points down to Chronic Irreversible.
Acute Reversible points down to Acute Irreversible.
Chronic Irreversible <-> Acute Irreversible.
Let's try to make a unified table for the "flowchart" request.
The prompt says "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". This implies if there are data tables, use HTML. If it's a flowchart, use a table representation.
I'll create two tables, one for each black box.
Table 1:
| **The Progression of Pulp Disease** | |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Clinically Normal Pulp** | **Short-term irritation** |
| **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** $\leftrightarrow$ | **Acute Reversible Pulpitis** |
| $\updownarrow$ | $\updownarrow$ |
| **Long-term irritation** (points up to the reversible pulpitises) | |
Actually, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
So:
**The Progression of Pulp Disease**
**Clinically Normal Pulp**
**Short-term irritation**
**Chronic Reversible Pulpitis**
**Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
**Long-term irritation**
Table 2:
| **The Progression of Pulp Disease** | |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Clinically Normal Pulp** | **+ Micro-organisms** |
| **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** $\leftrightarrow$ | **Acute Reversible Pulpitis** |
| $\downarrow$ | $\downarrow$ |
| **Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis** $\leftrightarrow$ | **Acute Irreversible Pulpitis** |
I will use HTML tables to represent the structure clearly.
Header:
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
Content:
[Table 1]
[Table 2]
Footer:
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
Page 17
Let's refine the HTML table content to match the visual layout better.
Table 1:
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:cyan;">**The Progression of Pulp Disease**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center; color:green;">**Clinically Normal Pulp**</td>
<td style="text-align:center; background-color:brown; color:yellow; border:1px dashed red;">**Short-term irritation**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center; color:yellow; border:1px solid red;">**Chronic Reversible Pulpitis**</td>
<td style="text-align:center; color:yellow; border:1px solid red;">**Acute Reversible Pulpitis**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:cyan; background-color:brown; border:1px dashed red;">**Long-term irritation**</td>
</tr>
Wait, the arrows are important.
In Table 1:
- Short-term irritation points to Clinically Normal Pulp.
- Clinically Normal Pulp points to Chronic/Reversible.
- Long-term irritation points to Chronic/Acute Reversible.
- Arrows go back from Reversible to Normal.
In Table 2:
- Micro-organisms points to Reversible stages.
- Reversible points to Irreversible (down).
- Irreversible stages point to each other.
I will try to represent the text content in a table structure that mimics the hierarchy.
Table 1 Structure:
Row 1: Header "The Progression of Pulp Disease"
Row 2: Left: "Clinically Normal Pulp" (Green), Right: "Short-term irritation" (Yellow)
Row 3: Left: "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow), Right: "Acute Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow)
Row 4: Center: "Long-term irritation" (Cyan)
Table 2 Structure:
Row 1: Header "The Progression of Pulp Disease"
Row 2: Left: "Clinically Normal Pulp" (Green), Right: "+ Micro-organisms" (Red)
Row 3: Left: "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow), Right: "Acute Reversible Pulpitis" (Yellow)
Row 4: Left: "Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" (Yellow), Right: "Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" (Yellow)
This seems like a reasonable interpretation of "flowcharts as tables as best as possible".
One detail: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
- Cyan text: **The Progression of Pulp Disease**
- Green text: **Clinically Normal Pulp**
- Yellow text: **Short-term irritation**, **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis**, etc.
- Red text: **+ Micro-organisms**
- Cyan text (Long-term): **Long-term irritation**
I will use standard markdown bolding for these. I will use HTML tables for the layout.
Final check on PDF text vs Image text.
PDF has: "Necrobiosis", "Pulp Necrosis", "Necrotic and Infected Pulp", "Pulpless and Infected Root Canal System".
Image does NOT have this. The second image stops at "Acute Irreversible Pulpitis".
So I must exclude the PDF text that isn't in the image.
One final check on colors.
"Short-term irritation" has a dashed red border.
"Long-term irritation" has a dashed red border.
"+ Micro-organisms" has a dashed red border.
"Acute Reversible Pulpitis" and "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" have red borders.
"Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" and "Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" have red borders (actually yellow text, red border in the bottom image? No, looks like yellow text, red border). Wait, in the bottom image, the irreversible pulpitises have yellow text and red borders.
"Clinically Normal Pulp" has a green border.
I will focus on extracting the text and formatting it as requested.
Structure:
1. Header text.
2. HTML Table for Top Diagram.
3. HTML Table for Bottom Diagram.
4. Footer text.
I need to make sure I don't add anything else.
"DO NOT ADD ANYTHING TO THE TEXT ITSELF, YOU ARE ONLY TRANSCRIBING/ FORMATTING DO NOT SAY ANYTHING ELSE."
Okay, ready to write.
I will use inline styles for colors to be precise, as "different colour... formatted as bold" might imply just bold, but usually OCR tasks benefit from indicating color. However, the instruction is specific: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". It doesn't say "use HTML color tags". It says "Format tables in HTML... and flowcharts as tables...". It also says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This suggests simple markdown bolding is the priority for color differentiation. But since I'm using HTML tables, I can add color. I'll stick to bolding as the primary instruction for "different colour", but since it's a table, I might as well use color if it helps distinguish, but I will prioritize the "bold" instruction. Actually, rereading: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This is a formatting rule for the text extraction. So Green text -> **Green Text**. Yellow text -> **Yellow Text**.
Let's look at the specific text again.
"The Progression of Pulp Disease" - Cyan. -> **The Progression of Pulp Disease**
"Clinically Normal Pulp" - Green. -> **Clinically Normal Pulp**
"Short-term irritation" - Yellow. -> **Short-term irritation**
"Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" - Yellow. -> **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis**
"Acute Reversible Pulpitis" - Yellow. -> **Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
"Long-term irritation" - Cyan. -> **Long-term irritation**
"+ Micro-organisms" - Red. -> **+ Micro-organisms**
"Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" - Yellow. -> **Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis**
"Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" - Yellow. -> **Acute Irreversible Pulpitis**
Wait, looking at the bottom image, "Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" and "Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" text is yellow.
The borders are red.
I will construct the HTML tables.
Table 1:
Row 1: Center Header
Row 2: Clinically Normal Pulp (Green) | Short-term irritation (Yellow)
Row 3: Chronic Reversible Pulpitis (Yellow) | Acute Reversible Pulpitis (Yellow)
Row 4: Long-term irritation (Cyan) - centered below Row 3? No, it's below the reversible ones.
Actually, looking at the layout:
Top: Clinically Normal Pulp.
Right of Top: Short-term irritation.
Below Top: Chronic Reversible (Left) ... Acute Reversible (Right).
Below those: Long-term irritation.
Arrows connect them.
Table 2:
Top: Clinically Normal Pulp.
Right of Top: + Micro-organisms.
Below Top: Chronic Reversible (Left) ... Acute Reversible (Right).
Below those: Chronic Irreversible (Left) ... Acute Irreversible (Right).
I will use a clean table layout.
One detail: "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)". This implies if I have a table, it must be HTML. The flowchart is being treated as a table. So the whole response might need to be the HTML tables?
"Extract all of the text from this image... Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible... Other than what was previously mentioned all other formating must be in MARKDOWN"
So:
- Header/Footer text -> Markdown.
- Flowcharts -> HTML Tables.
Let's go.
Header:
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
Table 1 (Top Flowchart):
<table>
...
</table>
Table 2 (Bottom Flowchart):
<table>
...
</table>
Footer:
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
Page 17
I will try to preserve the text colors using HTML style attributes within the table cells to make it look like the image, as "different colour" implies visual distinction. But the instruction says "formatted as bold". I'll do both: bold AND color if possible in HTML, but definitely bold. Actually, the instruction "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold" is a specific rule. I will follow it. But since I'm outputting HTML tables, I can add color too.
Let's look at the PDF text provided in the prompt again.
"PDF Text: Pulp and Root Canal Conditions... Page 17... Necrobiosis..."
The prompt says "use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr".
The PDF text confirms "The Progression of Pulp Disease", "Clinically Normal Pulp", etc.
It lists "Necrobiosis" etc which are NOT in the image. I will ignore them as per "ignore it !".
Okay, plan is solid.
Table 1 Content:
Row 1: **The Progression of Pulp Disease** (colspan=2)
Row 2: **Clinically Normal Pulp** | **Short-term irritation**
Row 3: **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** | **Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
Row 4: (Empty cell) | **Long-term irritation** (Actually, Long-term irritation is centered below the reversible pulpitises, with arrows going up to them).
Wait, in the image, "Long-term irritation" is below "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" and "Acute Reversible Pulpitis".
And there are arrows going from Long-term irritation UP to both reversible pulpitises.
And arrows going from Reversible pulpitises UP to Clinically Normal Pulp.
And Short-term irritation points to Clinically Normal Pulp.
Table 2 Content:
Row 1: **The Progression of Pulp Disease** (colspan=2)
Row 2: **Clinically Normal Pulp** | **+ Micro-organisms**
Row 3: **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** | **Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
Row 4: **Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis** | **Acute Irreversible Pulpitis**
I will format the tables to reflect this hierarchy.
One detail on colors for the table:
- "The Progression of Pulp Disease" is Cyan.
- "Clinically Normal Pulp" is Green.
- "Short-term irritation" is Yellow.
- "Chronic Reversible Pulpitis" is Yellow.
- "Acute Reversible Pulpitis" is Yellow.
- "Long-term irritation" is Cyan.
- "+ Micro-organisms" is Red.
- "Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis" is Yellow.
- "Acute Irreversible Pulpitis" is Yellow.
I will use HTML `style` to apply these colors and `bold` tags.
One final check on the footer.
"2nd Year DMD - 2023"
"Page 17"
This is in the white space below the black boxes.
Let's assemble.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2" style="text-align: center; color: cyan;">The Progression of Pulp Disease</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; color: green; border: 1px solid green;">Clinically Normal Pulp</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: yellow; background-color: #8B4513; border: 1px dashed red;">Short-term irritation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; color: yellow; border: 1px solid red;">Chronic Reversible Pulpitis</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: yellow; border: 1px solid red;">Acute Reversible Pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center; color: cyan; background-color: #8B4513; border: 1px dashed red;">Long-term irritation</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2" style="text-align: center; color: cyan;">The Progression of Pulp Disease</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; color: green; border: 1px solid green;">Clinically Normal Pulp</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red; background-color: gray; border: 1px dashed red;">+ Micro-organisms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; color: yellow; border: 1px solid red;">Chronic Reversible Pulpitis</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: yellow; border: 1px solid red;">Acute Reversible Pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; color: yellow; border: 1px solid red;">Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: yellow; border: 1px solid red;">Acute Irreversible Pulpitis</td>
</tr>
</table>
**2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023**
Page 17
#### Reversible and Irreversible Progression
- **Reversible Stage**
- **Clinically Normal Pulp** &larr; Short-term irritation
- **Chronic Reversible Pulpitis** &harr; **Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
- Long-term irritation &rarr; Reversible Pulpitis
- **Irreversible Stage**
- **+ Micro-organisms** &rarr; Reversible Pulpitis
- Reversible Pulpitis &rarr; **Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis** or **Acute Irreversible Pulpitis**
![]()
A black flowchart diagram titled 'The Progression of Pulp Disease' illustrating the relationship between 'Clinically Normal Pulp', 'Short-term irritation', 'Chronic Reversible Pulpitis', 'Acute Reversible Pulpitis', and 'Long-term irritation'.
![]()
A second black flowchart diagram titled 'The Progression of Pulp Disease' showing the progression from reversible states like 'Chronic Reversible Pulpitis' to irreversible states like 'Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis' with the introduction of '+ Micro-organisms'.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" style="text-align:center; font-size: 1.2em; color: cyan;">**The Progression of Pulp Disease**</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="text-align:center;">**Clinically Normal Pulp**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="text-align:center;">**+ Micro-organisms**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center; border-right: 1px solid #000;">**Chronic Reversible Pulpitis**</td>
<td style="text-align:center;"></td>
<td style="text-align:center; border-left: 1px solid #000;">**Acute Reversible Pulpitis**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center; border-right: 1px solid #000;">**Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis**</td>
<td style="text-align:center;"></td>
<td style="text-align:center; border-left: 1px solid #000;">**Acute Irreversible Pulpitis**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="text-align:center;">**Necrobiosis**</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" style="text-align:center; font-size: 1.2em; color: cyan;">**The Progression of Pulp Disease**</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="text-align:center;">**Clinically Normal Pulp**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="text-align:center;">**+ Micro-organisms**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center; border-right: 1px solid #000;">**Chronic Reversible Pulpitis**</td>
<td style="text-align:center;"></td>
<td style="text-align:center; border-left: 1px solid #000;">**Acute Reversible Pulpitis**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:center; border-right: 1px solid #000;">**Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis**</td>
<td style="text-align:center;"></td>
<td style="text-align:center; border-left: 1px solid #000;">**Acute Irreversible Pulpitis**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="text-align:center;">**Necrobiosis**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="text-align:center;">**Necrotic and Infected Pulp**</td>
</tr>
</table>
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
Page 18
#### Progression to Necrobiosis
- **Clinically Normal Pulp**
- **+ Micro-organisms**
- **Chronic/Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
- **Chronic/Acute Irreversible Pulpitis**
- **Necrobiosis**
- **Necrotic and Infected Pulp**
![]()
A flowchart titled 'The Progression of Pulp Disease' illustrating the stages from a clinically normal pulp and micro-organisms through chronic and acute reversible and irreversible pulpitis, culminating in necrobiosis.
![]()
A continuation of the pulp disease progression diagram, showing the transition from necrobiosis to a necrotic and infected pulp, following the same stages of reversible and irreversible pulpitis.
<table>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:cyan; font-size:18px; font-family:sans-serif;"><b>The Progression of Pulp Disease</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:green; font-weight:bold;">Clinically Normal Pulp</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:red; font-weight:bold; border: 2px dashed red;">+ Micro-organisms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="color:orange; font-weight:bold;">Chronic Reversible Pulpitis</td>
<td style="color:orange; font-weight:bold;">Acute Reversible Pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="color:yellow; font-weight:bold;">Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis</td>
<td style="color:yellow; font-weight:bold;">Acute Irreversible Pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:orange; font-weight:bold;">Necrobiosis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:magenta; font-weight:bold;">Necrotic and Infected Pulp</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:pink; font-weight:bold;">Pulpless and Infected Root Canal System</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:cyan; font-size:18px; font-family:sans-serif;"><b>The Progression of Pulp Disease</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:green; font-weight:bold;">Clinically Normal Pulp</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align:center; color:red; font-weight:bold; border: 2px dashed red;">+ Micro-organisms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="color:orange; font-weight:bold;">Chronic Reversible Pulpitis</td>
<td style="color:orange; font-weight:bold;">Acute Reversible Pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="color:yellow; font-weight:bold;">Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis</td>
<td style="color:yellow; font-weight:bold;">Acute Irreversible Pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="color:white; font-weight:bold; border: 2px dashed yellow; background-color:gray; padding:5px;">+ TRAUMA<br>(e.g. luxation, avulsion, etc)</td>
<td style="color:orange; font-weight:bold;">Necrobiosis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="color:orange; font-weight:bold;">Pulp Necrosis</td>
<td style="color:magenta; font-weight:bold;">Necrotic and Infected Pulp</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="color:red; font-weight:bold; border: 2px dashed red;">+ Micro-organisms</td>
<td style="color:pink; font-weight:bold;">Pulpless and Infected Root Canal System</td>
</tr>
</table>
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
**Page 19**
#### Comprehensive Progression Model
- **Infection Pathway**
- Clinically Normal Pulp &rarr; **+ Micro-organisms** &rarr; Reversible Pulpitis &rarr; Irreversible Pulpitis &rarr; **Necrobiosis** &rarr; **Necrotic and Infected Pulp** &rarr; **Pulpless and Infected RCS**
- **Trauma Pathway**
- Clinically Normal Pulp &rarr; **+ Trauma** &rarr; **Pulp Necrosis**
- **+ Micro-organisms** &rarr; **Necrotic and Infected Pulp**
![]()
A flowchart diagram titled 'The Progression of Pulp Disease' illustrating the pathological evolution from a clinically normal pulp. It shows pathways involving micro-organisms leading to reversible and irreversible pulpitis, necrobiosis, and eventually a pulpless and infected root canal system.
![]()
A comparative flowchart titled 'The Progression of Pulp Disease' that includes an additional pathway for trauma. It details how trauma (e.g., luxation) can lead to pulp necrosis, which then progresses to necrotic and infected pulp alongside the standard microbial progression.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 20
**The Progression of Pulp Disease**
* The pulp status changes over time
* It progresses through several stages
* A continuum .....
**The Progression of Pulp Disease**
<table>
<tr>
<th>Clinically Normal Pulp</th>
<th>Chronic Reversible Pulpitis</th>
<th><b>Acute Reversible Pulpitis</b></th>
<th>Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis</th>
<th><b>Acute Irreversible Pulpitis</b></th>
<th><b>Pulp Necro-biosis</b></th>
<th><b>Pulp Necrosis With Infection</b></th>
<th>Pulpless Infected RCS</th>
</tr>
</table>
#### The Disease Continuum
- The pulp status changes over time.
- It progresses through several stages as a continuum.
#### Sequence of Conditions
1. Clinically Normal Pulp
2. Chronic Reversible Pulpitis
3. **Acute Reversible Pulpitis**
4. Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis
5. **Acute Irreversible Pulpitis**
6. **Pulp Necrobiosis**
7. **Pulp Necrosis With Infection**
8. Pulpless Infected RCS
![]()
A diagram illustrating the progression of pulp disease, showing a continuum from clinically normal pulp through various stages of reversible and irreversible pulpitis to pulp necrosis and infected root canal systems. Red arrows indicate potential reversibility between acute and chronic states, while a large arrow indicates the overall progression.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**But what about ....**
❓ **“Vital” pulps**
❌ & **“Non-vital” pulps**
> **Old terminology !!!**
> - Encourages incorrect thinking about the disease processes
> - **Not meaningful or useful terms**
<table>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left; vertical-align: top;">
❌ <b>Pulp Vitality Test</b><br><br>
➢ <i>“Vital pulp”</i><br>
➢ <i>“Non-vital pulp”</i>
</td>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: top;">
✅ <b>Pulp Sensibility Tests</b><br><br><br>
<b>CO₂</b><br>
<img src="placeholder" alt="Image showing CO2 pulp test on teeth">
<br>
<b>Electric</b><br>
<img src="placeholder" alt="Image showing electric pulp tester on teeth">
<br>
<b>Heat</b><br>
<img src="placeholder" alt="Image showing heat testing device">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
**Page 21**
#### Limitations of Traditional Terminology
**"Vital" and "Non-vital" Pulps**
- These are considered old terminology.
- They encourage incorrect thinking about disease processes.
- They are not considered meaningful or useful terms in modern diagnostics.
#### Diagnostic Testing Standards
- **Pulp Sensibility Tests** (Correct terminology)
- **CO₂** (Cold testing)
- **Electric** (Electric pulp testing)
- **Heat** (Thermal testing)
- **Pulp Vitality Test** (Incorrect/Old terminology)
- Historically used to label a "Vital pulp" or "Non-vital pulp"
![]()
Table comparing 'Pulp Vitality Test' terminology with 'Pulp Sensibility Tests' (CO2, Electric, Heat) methods.
![]()
Photo showing a CO2 pulp test on teeth.
![]()
Photo showing an electric pulp tester on teeth.
![]()
Photo showing a heat testing device.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions | Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
--- | ---
**Terminology**
* **Thermal & electric pulp tests are “Sensibility Tests”**
* **Sensibility:** Ability to respond to a stimulus
* (Context: **When testing for pulp necrosis / pulple ss RCS**) -> Response: **Yes / No**
* **Note: <u>NOT</u> “Sensitivity” tests**
* **Sensitivity** is a condition of being very responsive to a stimulus
* (Context: **When testing for pulpitis**) -> Response: **Nature of response**
**Pulp Tests**
* **Sensibility Tests**
* **e.g. Thermal (cold, heat) and Electric**
* **Test for a nerve response**
* **Do NOT indicate blood supply**
* **Do NOT indicate health of the tissue**
****
****
****
2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023 | Page 22
#### Defining Sensibility vs. Sensitivity
- **Sensibility Tests** (Thermal and Electric)
- **Sensibility:** The ability of the pulp to respond to a stimulus.
- **Context:** Used when testing for pulp necrosis or a pulpless root canal system (RCS).
- **Response:** Recorded as a binary **Yes / No**.
- **Sensitivity** (Distinction)
- **Sensitivity:** A condition of being highly responsive to a stimulus.
- **Context:** Used when testing for pulpitis.
- **Response:** Evaluated based on the **nature of the response**.
#### Characteristics of Sensibility Tests
- Examples include Thermal (cold, heat) and Electric tests.
- These tests specifically check for a **nerve response**.
- **Important Limitations:**
- They do **NOT** indicate blood supply.
- They do **NOT** indicate the actual health of the tissue.
![]()
A terminology diagram explaining the difference between 'Sensibility' (ability to respond to a stimulus, tested with Yes/No for necrosis) and 'Sensitivity' (condition of being very responsive, tested for nature of response in pulpitis), using speech bubbles and colored boxes to illustrate the concepts.
![]()
A diagram titled 'Pulp Tests' defining 'Sensibility Tests' (e.g., thermal and electric) as tests for nerve response that do not indicate blood supply or tissue health, featuring a red-bordered text box connected by arrows to three photos demonstrating cold testing, probe testing, and an electric pulp tester device.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
# **Pulp Tests**
- Sensibility Tests
- **e.g. Thermal (cold, heat) and Electric**
- **Test for a nerve response**
- **Do NOT indicate blood supply**
- **Do NOT indicate health of the tissue**
- **Vitality Tests**
- **e.g. Laser Dopplerflowmetry, Pulse Oximetry**
- **Test for blood supply**
- **Do NOT indicate tissue health**
# **Pulp Tests**
- Must be interpreted in conjunction with:
- **The patient's symptoms**
- What the patient tells you
- **The clinical signs**
- Findings from the examination
- **The radiographic findings**
- Pulp canal calcification
- Previous endodontic treatment
- **Including pulp cap, pulpotomy, etc.**
- Periapical / peri-radicular condition(s)
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 23
#### Comparison of Pulp Test Types
- **Sensibility Tests**
- Examples: Thermal (cold, heat) and Electric.
- Function: Test for a nerve response.
- Limitations: Do not indicate blood supply or tissue health.
- **Vitality Tests**
- Examples: Laser Doppler Flowmetry, Pulse Oximetry.
- Function: Test for **blood supply**.
- Limitations: Do not indicate tissue health.
#### Clinical Interpretation Requirements
Pulp tests must not be used in isolation; they must be interpreted in conjunction with:
- **Patient Symptoms:** Subjective reports provided by the patient.
- **Clinical Signs:** Objective findings from the physical examination.
- **Radiographic Findings:**
- Presence of pulp canal calcification.
- Evidence of previous endodontic treatment (including pulp caps, pulpotomies, etc.).
- Assessment of periapical and peri-radicular conditions.
The user wants me to extract text from the provided image and PDF text.
I need to look at the image to get the visual text and the PDF text for context (though the image is very clear here).
The image contains two distinct sections or slides.
**Slide 1 (Top):**
- Header: "Pulp and Root Canal Conditions" and "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO"
- Main Title: "Pulp Canal Calcification"
- Left Image (X-ray): Label "No treatment reqd" with green arrows pointing to a tooth.
- Right Image (X-ray): Label "Endodontics reqd" with red arrows pointing to periapical pathology.
**Slide 2 (Bottom):**
- Title: "Old Terminology"
- List:
- Pulp disease
- "Vital" Pulp
- "Non-vital" pulp
- Bullet point: Leads to incorrect and inconsistent thinking about the disease processes
- And the treatment needs
**Footer:**
- "2nd Year DMD - 2023"
- "Page 24"
**Instructions:**
- Prioritize image text.
- Use PDF text for context.
- Match formatting.
- Color text -> Bold.
- No tables unless it's a table. No flowcharts as tables unless necessary.
- If figure is image only with sparse text -> description in tags."
The top part has X-rays. It's not just a figure with labels. It has text "Pulp Canal Calcification", "No treatment reqd", "Endodontics reqd". So I should transcribe the text.
The bottom part is a text slide.
Let's refine the "reqd" part. The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". The PDF text has "reqd". The image has "req<sup>d</sup>". I will write "req<sup>d</sup>" to match the image visual.
One detail: The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold."
So:
- Yellow text: **Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**, **Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**, **Pulp Canal Calcification**, **Old Terminology**, **And the treatment needs**.
- White/Black text in top slide: **No treatment req<sup>d</sup>** (Actually it's white inside a box).
- Orange text in top slide: **Endodontics req<sup>d</sup>**.
- Cyan text in bottom slide: **"Vital" Pulp**, **"Non-vital" pulp**.
- Pink text in bottom slide: **Leads to incorrect and inconsistent thinking about the disease processes**.
I will bold the main colored elements.
Final check of the text:
Top right: "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO"
Top left: "Pulp and Root Canal Conditions"
Middle title: "Pulp Canal Calcification"
Left box: "No treatment req<sup>d</sup>"
Right box: "Endodontics req<sup>d</sup>"
Bottom title: "Old Terminology"
Bullet: "Pulp disease"
Sub-bullets: "“Vital” Pulp", "“Non-vital” pulp"
Arrow text: "Leads to incorrect and inconsistent thinking about the disease processes"
Sub-bullet: "And the treatment needs"
Footer: "2nd Year DMD - 2023", "Page 24"
The prompt asks to "try to match the text formatting as much as possible".
I will use bolding for colored text.
One specific instruction: "Note that erros may occur with the pdf text, if it is obviously corrupted or error ridden text then ignore it !"
The PDF text provided in the prompt is:
"Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 24
Pulp Canal Calcification
No treatment reqd
Endodontics reqd
Old Terminology
Pulp disease
“Vital” Pulp
“Non-vital” pulp
Leads to incorrect and inconsistent
thinking about the disease processes
And the treatment needs"
This matches the image quite well. The "reqd" in PDF matches the image's "req<sup>d</sup>". I will stick to the image's visual representation if possible, but standard text "reqd" is safer if I can't do superscript easily, though HTML allows it. I'll use `<sup>d</sup>`.
Let's construct the final response.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**Pulp Canal Calcification**
**No treatment req<sup>d</sup>**
**Endodontics req<sup>d</sup>**
**Old Terminology**
**Pulp disease**
**“Vital” Pulp**
**“Non-vital” pulp**
**Leads to incorrect and inconsistent thinking about the disease processes**
**And the treatment needs**
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
**Page 24**
Wait, I need to check the colors again.
- "Pulp Canal Calcification" is yellow. -> Bold.
- "No treatment reqd" is white. -> Not colored? Or is it? It's white text. The instruction says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." This implies if it's NOT the standard color (usually black/white), bold it. Or maybe it means "if the text is in a different colour [than the surrounding text or standard text], format it as bold". Given the context of highlighting, I will bold the titles and the colored text.
- "Endodontics reqd" is orange. -> Bold.
- "Old Terminology" is yellow. -> Bold.
- "Vital" Pulp is cyan. -> Bold.
- "Non-vital" pulp is cyan. -> Bold.
- "Leads to..." is pink. -> Bold.
- "And the treatment needs" is yellow. -> Bold.
The white text "Pulp disease" is on a blue background. It might be considered standard, but usually, headers are bold. I'll bold the main headers.
Let's look at the "Pulp disease" section.
"Pulp disease" is white.
"Vital" Pulp is cyan.
"Non-vital" pulp is cyan.
So:
**Pulp disease**
**“Vital” Pulp**
**“Non-vital” pulp**
Actually, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold."
This is a bit ambiguous. Does it mean "if the text is colored (not black/white), bold it"? Or "if it is a different color than the base text"?
Given the visual style, everything is colored or on a dark background. I will bold the distinct colored text elements to emphasize them as per the likely intent of the instruction (to make text stand out like the original slide design).
Let's refine the list structure.
The slide has:
- Pulp disease (White bullet)
- "Vital" Pulp (Yellow/Cyan square bullet)
- "Non-vital" pulp (Yellow/Cyan square bullet)
- Leads to... (Pink triangle bullet)
- And the treatment needs (Yellow square bullet)
I will use markdown lists.
Final plan:
1. Top header info.
2. Middle section text.
3. Bottom section text.
4. Footer info.
One detail: "reqd" vs "req<sup>d</sup>". The image clearly has a superscript 'd'. I will use `<sup>d</sup>`.
The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image...".
The image contains X-rays. I will not describe the X-rays in detail as "image only with labels", because there is significant text overlay ("No treatment reqd", "Endodontics reqd", "Pulp Canal Calcification"). So I will transcribe the text.
The bottom part is a slide with text.
Okay, ready to write.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**Pulp Canal Calcification**
**No treatment req<sup>d</sup>**
**Endodontics req<sup>d</sup>**
**Old Terminology**
**Pulp disease**
**“Vital” Pulp**
**“Non-vital” pulp**
**Leads to incorrect and inconsistent thinking about the disease processes**
**And the treatment needs**
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
**Page 24**
#### Clinical Management of Calcification
- **Pulp Canal Calcification**
- In cases where no pathology is present, **no treatment is required**.
- In cases where periapical pathology is identified, **endodontics is required**.
#### Impact of Outdated Terminology
- **Old Terminology regarding Pulp Disease:**
- "Vital" Pulp
- "Non-vital" pulp
- **Consequences of use:**
- Leads to incorrect and inconsistent thinking about disease processes.
- Negatively impacts the assessment of treatment needs.
The user wants me to extract text from an image which appears to be a slide presentation about "Pulp and Root Canal Conditions".
I need to look at the provided image and the provided PDF text to combine them.
The prompt asks to prioritize image text but use PDF text for context.
The prompt asks to format tables in HTML and flowcharts as tables.
The prompt asks to format colored text as bold.
The prompt asks not to add anything to the text itself.
The prompt asks to treat the whole page as a figure if the text only makes sense in context (labels/names). However, this page has substantial text content, so I should transcribe it.
The page has a header, two main blue boxes (slides), and a footer.
**Header:**
"Pulp and Root Canal Conditions"
"Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO"
**First Blue Box (Slide 1):**
Title: "“Vital” Pulp" (The word "Vital" is crossed out with a red X, but the text is there. Wait, looking closely at the image, there is a big red X over "Vital". The text says "“Vital” Pulp". Actually, it looks like "“Vital” Pulp" is written, but crossed out? No, the red X is part of the graphic design, likely indicating "NOT just Vital Pulp" or correcting a misconception. Wait, the text says "“Vital” Pulp" in green. Let's look at the PDF text. The PDF text says "“Vital” Pulp". Okay.
Subtext: "Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:"
Box on left: "12 different conditions !!!"
List items:
- Clinically normal pulp
- Sensitive dentine
- Reversible pulpitis (Acute or chronic - cyan color)
- Irreversible pulpitis (Acute or chronic - cyan color)
- Necrobiosis
- Three types of internal resorption
- Pulp atrophy
- Pulp hyperplasia
Box on right: "Management ranges from:"
List items:
- Nil
- Desensitisation
- New restoration
- Conservative pulp therapy
- Endodontics
- Extraction
There are orange arrows pointing down.
**Second Blue Box (Slide 2):**
Title: "“Non-Vital” Pulp" (Also has a red X over it).
Subtext: "Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:"
Box on left: "10 different conditions !!!"
List items:
- Clinically normal pulp (With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification - cyan color)
- Necrobiosis
- Pulp Necrosis (With or Without Infection - cyan color)
- Pulpless Infected Canal (With Apical Periodontitis - cyan color)
- Previous Endodontic Treatment (With or Without Infection - cyan color)
- Internal infl. or repl. resorption
Box on right: "Management ranges from:"
List items:
- Nil
- Orthograde endodontics (Different medicaments)
- Re-treatment
- Periapical surgery (Curettage, Apicoectomy, Retrograde endodontics)
- Extraction
There are orange arrows pointing down.
**Footer:**
"2nd Year DMD - 2023"
"Page 25"
**Formatting instructions:**
- "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold."
- "Format tables in HTML... and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". The layout is essentially two columns or two main sections. I will use a table structure to represent the layout of the slides to keep it organized as requested ("flowcharts as tables").
- "Prioritize image text but use PDF text for context". The image text is quite clear. The PDF text provided is just a raw dump of the text on the slides. I will use the image to get the exact wording and layout, and the PDF to confirm spelling if needed (e.g., "Desensitisation" vs "Desensitization" - image says "Desensitisation").
- "DO NOT ADD ANYTHING TO THE TEXT ITSELF".
Let's refine the "flowcharts as tables" part. The slides are structured with a list of conditions on the left and a list of management on the right. I can represent each slide as a table.
**Slide 1 Table Structure:**
Col 1: 12 different conditions !!! | List
Col 2: Management ranges from: | List
**Slide 2 Table Structure:**
Col 1: 10 different conditions !!! | List
Col 2: Management ranges from: | List
Let's look at the colors.
- "Vital" Pulp: Green text. (Bold)
- "Non-Vital" Pulp: Pink/Purple text. (Bold)
- "12 different conditions !!!": Cyan text inside a black box. (Bold)
- "10 different conditions !!!": Cyan text inside a black box. (Bold)
- "Acute or chronic" (under Reversible): Cyan. (Bold)
- "Acute or chronic" (under Irreversible): Cyan. (Bold)
- "With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification": Cyan. (Bold)
- "With or Without Infection" (under Pulp Necrosis): Cyan. (Bold)
- "With Apical Periodontitis": Cyan. (Bold)
- "With or Without Infection" (under Previous Endodontic Treatment): Cyan. (Bold)
- "Different medicaments": White text.
- "Curettage", "Apicoectomy", "Retrograde endodontics": White text.
The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". It doesn't explicitly say to use color tags, just bold. I will stick to bolding.
Let's construct the HTML tables.
**Header:**
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
**Slide 1:**
The text "“Vital” Pulp" is green. I will make it bold.
The text "“Non-Vital” Pulp" is pink/purple. I will make it bold.
Actually, looking at the request "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)". This implies I should separate the tables from the markdown text.
"Extract all of the text from this image... Other than what was previously mentioned all other formating must be in MARKDOWN"
So:
- Header text: Markdown
- Slide content: HTML Tables (since it's a structured layout/flowchart of conditions vs management)
- Footer text: Markdown
Let's try to map the slide layout to a table.
Row 1: Title
Row 2: Subtitle
Row 3: Two columns (Conditions | Management)
**Slide 1 Table:**
| 12 different conditions !!! | Management ranges from: |
| :--- | :--- |
| Clinically normal pulp | Nil |
| Sensitive dentine | Desensitisation |
| Reversible pulpitis <br> <i>Acute or chronic</i> | New restoration |
| Irreversible pulpitis <br> <i>Acute or chronic</i> | Conservative pulp therapy |
| Necrobiosis | Endodontics |
| Three types of internal resorption | Extraction |
| Pulp atrophy | |
| Pulp hyperplasia | |
Wait, the alignment in the image isn't perfectly 1-to-1.
The "Management ranges from" list is separate.
The arrow suggests a progression or range.
I will group the items.
**Revised Slide 1 Table:**
| **12 different conditions !!!** | **Management ranges from:** |
| :--- | :--- |
| Clinically normal pulp | Nil |
| Sensitive dentine | Desensitisation |
| Reversible pulpitis <br> *Acute or chronic* | New restoration |
| Irreversible pulpitis <br> *Acute or chronic* | Conservative pulp therapy |
| Necrobiosis | Endodontics |
| Three types of internal resorption | Extraction |
| Pulp atrophy | |
| Pulp hyperplasia | |
Actually, the prompt says "flowcharts as tables as best as possible".
The right side lists management options.
Nil
Desensitisation
New restoration
Conservative pulp therapy
Endodontics
Extraction
The left side lists conditions.
Clinically normal pulp
Sensitive dentine
Reversible pulpitis
Irreversible pulpitis
Necrobiosis
Three types of internal resorption
Pulp atrophy
Pulp hyperplasia
I will create a table that reflects the two columns.
**Slide 2 Table:**
| **10 different conditions !!!** | **Management ranges from:** |
| :--- | :--- |
| Clinically normal pulp <br> *With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification* | Nil |
| Necrobiosis | Orthograde endodontics <br> - Different medicaments |
| Pulp Necrosis <br> *With or Without Infection* | Re-treatment |
| Pulpless Infected Canal <br> *With Apical Periodontitis* | Periapical surgery <br> - Curettage <br> - Apicoectomy <br> - Retrograde endodontics |
| Previous Endodontic Treatment <br> *With or Without Infection* | Extraction |
| Internal infl. or repl. resorption | |
Wait, looking at Slide 2, the list on the right is:
Nil
Orthograde endodontics
- Different medicaments
Re-treatment
Periapical surgery
- Curettage
- Apicoectomy
- Retrograde endodontics
Extraction
This doesn't map 1-to-1 with the left list. It's a list of possibilities.
So the table should probably just list them.
Col 1: Conditions
Col 2: Management
Let's look at the "10 different conditions" box.
1. Clinically normal pulp (With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification)
2. Necrobiosis
3. Pulp Necrosis (With or Without Infection)
4. Pulpless Infected Canal (With Apical Periodontitis)
5. Previous Endodontic Treatment (With or Without Infection)
6. Internal infl. or repl. resorption
That's only 6 items listed. But the box says "10 different conditions !!!". This implies sub-types are counted.
- Clinically normal pulp (with/without calcification) = 2 conditions?
- Pulp Necrosis (with/without infection) = 2 conditions?
- Previous Endo Treatment (with/without infection) = 2 conditions?
- Pulpless Infected Canal (with apical periodontitis) = 1 condition?
- Necrobiosis = 1
- Internal resorption = 3 types mentioned in slide 1? Here it just says "Internal infl. or repl. resorption". Maybe that counts as 2?
The math is fuzzy, but I will transcribe what is written.
Let's stick to transcribing the text exactly as it appears in the image, using bold for colored text.
**Header:**
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
**Slide 1:**
(Blue background box)
**“Vital” Pulp**
Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:
**12 different conditions !!!**
- Clinically normal pulp
- Sensitive dentine
- Reversible pulpitis
- *Acute or chronic*
- Irreversible pulpitis
- *Acute or chronic*
- Necrobiosis
- Three types of internal resorption
- Pulp atrophy
- Pulp hyperplasia
**Management ranges from:**
- Nil
- Desensitisation
- New restoration
- Conservative pulp therapy
- Endodontics
- Extraction
**Slide 2:**
(Blue background box)
**“Non-Vital” Pulp**
Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:
**10 different conditions !!!**
- Clinically normal pulp
- *With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification*
- Necrobiosis
- Pulp Necrosis
- *With or Without Infection*
- Pulpless Infected Canal
- *With Apical Periodontitis*
- Previous Endodontic Treatment
- *With or Without Infection*
- Internal infl. or repl. resorption
**Management ranges from:**
- Nil
- Orthograde endodontics
- Different medicaments
- Re-treatment
- Periapical surgery
- Curettage
- Apicoectomy
- Retrograde endodontics
- Extraction
**Footer:**
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 25
The prompt asks to format tables in HTML. The slide layout is effectively two columns. I will use HTML tables for the main content blocks to represent the visual layout.
**Slide 1 HTML Table:**
<table>
<tr><th>12 different conditions !!!</th><th>Management ranges from:</th></tr>
<tr><td>Clinically normal pulp</td><td>Nil</td></tr>
<tr><td>Sensitive dentine</td><td>Desensitisation</td></tr>
<tr><td>Reversible pulpitis<br><i>Acute or chronic</i></td><td>New restoration</td></tr>
<tr><td>Irreversible pulpitis<br><i>Acute or chronic</i></td><td>Conservative pulp therapy</td></tr>
<tr><td>Necrobiosis</td><td>Endodontics</td></tr>
<tr><td>Three types of internal resorption</td><td>Extraction</td></tr>
<tr><td>Pulp atrophy</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td>Pulp hyperplasia</td><td></td></tr>
</table>
Wait, the alignment in the image isn't strictly row-based. The management list is a separate block.
The prompt says "flowcharts as tables as best as possible".
I will just list the conditions in one column and management in another, matching the visual separation.
Let's look at the colors again.
"Vital" Pulp is green.
"Non-Vital" Pulp is pink/purple.
"12 different conditions !!!" is cyan.
"10 different conditions !!!" is cyan.
Subtext like "Acute or chronic" is cyan.
Subtext like "With or Without..." is cyan.
I will use bold for all these colored texts as requested ("if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold").
**Refining the plan:**
1. Header text (Markdown)
2. Slide 1 Content (HTML Table)
- Col 1: Conditions list
- Col 2: Management list
- Note: The image has arrows indicating a range/spectrum. A table is a good way to show the two sides.
3. Slide 2 Content (HTML Table)
- Col 1: Conditions list
- Col 2: Management list
4. Footer text (Markdown)
Let's check the text in Slide 1 again.
"Three types of internal resorption" is one bullet point.
"Pulp atrophy" is one.
"Pulp hyperplasia" is one.
Slide 2:
"Clinically normal pulp"
"With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification" (indented)
"Necrobiosis"
"Pulp Necrosis"
"With or Without Infection" (indented)
"Pulpless Infected Canal"
"With Apical Periodontitis" (indented)
"Previous Endodontic Treatment"
"With or Without Infection" (indented)
"Internal infl. or repl. resorption"
Management Slide 2:
"Nil"
"Orthograde endodontics"
"- Different medicaments"
"Re-treatment"
"Periapical surgery"
"- Curettage"
"- Apicoectomy"
"- Retrograde endodontics"
"Extraction"
I will structure the tables to reflect the hierarchy where possible.
One detail: "12 different conditions !!!" and "10 different conditions !!!" are in a black box with cyan text. I will make them bold headers in the table or div them out. Since the instruction is "Format tables in HTML", I'll put the whole slide content in a table to mimic the slide layout.
**Slide 1 Table:**
| **"“Vital” Pulp"** | |
| :--- | :--- |
| Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management: | |
| **12 different conditions !!!** | **Management ranges from:** |
| - Clinically normal pulp | - Nil |
| - Sensitive dentine | - Desensitisation |
| - Reversible pulpitis <br> - *Acute or chronic* | - New restoration |
| - Irreversible pulpitis <br> - *Acute or chronic* | - Conservative pulp therapy |
| - Necrobiosis | - Endodontics |
| - Three types of internal resorption | - Extraction |
| - Pulp atrophy | |
| - Pulp hyperplasia | |
Actually, looking at the arrows, it's a spectrum.
Left side: Conditions (12)
Right side: Management (Ranges from Nil to Extraction)
I will just list them.
**Slide 2 Table:**
| **"“Non-Vital” Pulp"** | |
| :--- | :--- |
| Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management: | |
| **10 different conditions !!!** | **Management ranges from:** |
| - Clinically normal pulp <br> - *With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification* | - Nil |
| - Necrobiosis | - Orthograde endodontics <br> - Different medicaments |
| - Pulp Necrosis <br> - *With or Without Infection* | - Re-treatment |
| - Pulpless Infected Canal <br> - *With Apical Periodontitis* | - Periapical surgery <br> - Curettage <br> - Apicoectomy <br> - Retrograde endodontics |
| - Previous Endodontic Treatment <br> - *With or Without Infection* | - Extraction |
| - Internal infl. or repl. resorption | |
Wait, the "Management ranges from" list in Slide 2 is:
Nil
Orthograde endodontics (with subpoint Different medicaments)
Re-treatment
Periapical surgery (with subpoints Curettage, Apicoectomy, Retrograde endodontics)
Extraction
This list has 7 main items (if counting subpoints as part of the main item).
The conditions list has 6 main bullets.
It's not a 1-to-1 mapping. It's just two lists side by side.
So I will just list the items in the respective columns.
**Slide 1 Management List:**
- Nil
- Desensitisation
- New restoration
- Conservative pulp therapy
- Endodontics
- Extraction
**Slide 2 Management List:**
- Nil
- Orthograde endodontics
- Different medicaments
- Re-treatment
- Periapical surgery
- Curettage
- Apicoectomy
- Retrograde endodontics
- Extraction
I will try to align the HTML table rows to look somewhat like the slide, but since it's text, just listing them in a single column per side is best.
One final check on colors/bolding.
- "Vital" Pulp: Green -> Bold
- "Non-Vital" Pulp: Pink -> Bold
- "12 different conditions !!!": Cyan -> Bold
- "10 different conditions !!!": Cyan -> Bold
- "Acute or chronic" (x2): Cyan -> Bold
- "With or Without..." (x3): Cyan -> Bold
- "With Apical Periodontitis": Cyan -> Bold
The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
I will interpret "different colour" as the colored text (green, cyan, pink/purple). Standard white text should remain normal.
Let's assemble.
Header:
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
Slide 1 Table:
<table>
...
</table>
Slide 2 Table:
<table>
...
</table>
Footer:
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 25
Wait, the prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr , try to match the text formatting as much as possible... If the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure... Similarly if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image... then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure".
This page is dense with text, so I will transcribe it. The "treat as figure" rule applies to things like "Fig 1. Tooth anatomy" where the text is just a label. Here the text IS the content.
One detail: "Internal infl. or repl. resorption". "infl." likely stands for inflammatory, "repl." for replantation? Or replacement? In dental context, "Internal inflammatory resorption" and "Internal replacement resorption". The text says "Internal infl. or repl. resorption". I will transcribe exactly what is there: "Internal infl. or repl. resorption".
Also "2nd Year DMD - 2023" is in the footer.
Let's refine the HTML table for Slide 1.
The layout is:
Top: Title "“Vital” Pulp"
Subtitle: "Could be several different conditions..."
Left Box: "12 different conditions !!!" + List
Right Box: "Management ranges from:" + List (with arrows)
I will use a table with two columns.
Col 1: Conditions
Col 2: Management
Row 1: Headers ("12 different conditions !!!", "Management ranges from:")
Row 2: First items.
...
The items don't align perfectly 1-to-1.
Clinically normal pulp aligns with Nil? Maybe.
Sensitive dentine aligns with Desensitisation? Yes.
Reversible pulpitis aligns with New restoration? Maybe.
Irreversible pulpitis aligns with Conservative pulp therapy? Yes.
Necrobiosis aligns with Endodontics? Yes.
Internal resorption aligns with Extraction? No, that's further down.
Actually, the arrows suggest a continuum.
I will just list the items in two columns.
**Slide 1 Table Content:**
| **12 different conditions !!!** | **Management ranges from:** |
| Clinically normal pulp | Nil |
| Sensitive dentine | Desensitisation |
| Reversible pulpitis<br><i>Acute or chronic</i> | New restoration |
| Irreversible pulpitis<br><i>Acute or chronic</i> | Conservative pulp therapy |
| Necrobiosis | Endodontics |
| Three types of internal resorption | Extraction |
| Pulp atrophy | |
| Pulp hyperplasia | |
Wait, "Endodontics" and "Extraction" are further down in the right column.
The right column items are:
Nil
Desensitisation
New restoration
Conservative pulp therapy
Endodontics
Extraction
The left column items are:
Clinically normal pulp
Sensitive dentine
Reversible pulpitis
Irreversible pulpitis
Necrobiosis
Three types of internal resorption
Pulp atrophy
Pulp hyperplasia
I will just list them sequentially in the table cells to capture all text.
**Slide 2 Table Content:**
| **10 different conditions !!!** | **Management ranges from:** |
| Clinically normal pulp<br><i>With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification</i> | Nil |
| Necrobiosis | Orthograde endodontics<br>- Different medicaments |
| Pulp Necrosis<br><i>With or Without Infection</i> | Re-treatment |
| Pulpless Infected Canal<br><i>With Apical Periodontitis</i> | Periapical surgery<br>- Curettage<br>- Apicoectomy<br>- Retrograde endodontics |
| Previous Endodontic Treatment<br><i>With or Without Infection</i> | Extraction |
| Internal infl. or repl. resorption | |
This looks reasonable. It captures the structure.
One check on "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO". The PDF text has it. The image has it.
"Pulp and Root Canal Conditions". Image and PDF match.
Final check on formatting:
- "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold."
- "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)" -> This means I cannot put markdown inside the HTML table if it's not standard HTML. Wait. "Format tables in HTML... and flowcharts as tables as best as possible... Other than what was previously mentioned all other formating must be in MARKDOWN".
This implies:
- Tables should be standard HTML `<table>`, `<tr>`, `<td>`.
- Inside the table, I can use bold `**`? No, HTML tables use `<b>` or `<strong>`. Markdown `**` doesn't work inside standard HTML unless it's a markdown renderer parsing HTML. But the instruction says "Format tables in HTML". I should use HTML tags like `<b>` or `<i>`.
- "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". So inside the `<td>`, I will use `<b>` for colored text.
- "use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr".
- "try to match the text formatting as much as possible".
So for Slide 1:
Header:
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
Table 1:
<table>
<tr><th colspan="2"><b>“Vital” Pulp</b></th></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2">Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:</td></tr>
<tr><td><b>12 different conditions !!!</b></td><td><b>Management ranges from:</b></td></tr>
<tr><td>Clinically normal pulp</td><td>Nil</td></tr>
<tr><td>Sensitive dentine</td><td>Desensitisation</td></tr>
<tr><td>Reversible pulpitis<br><i>Acute or chronic</i></td><td>New restoration</td></tr>
<tr><td>Irreversible pulpitis<br><i>Acute or chronic</i></td><td>Conservative pulp therapy</td></tr>
<tr><td>Necrobiosis</td><td>Endodontics</td></tr>
<tr><td>Three types of internal resorption</td><td>Extraction</td></tr>
<tr><td>Pulp atrophy</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td>Pulp hyperplasia</td><td></td></tr>
</table>
Wait, the instruction "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)" is tricky. Does it mean "Only output HTML tables, no markdown text anywhere"?
No, "Other than what was previously mentioned all other formating must be in MARKDOWN".
And "Extract all of the text from this image...".
So I will output Header (Markdown), Table (HTML), Table (HTML), Footer (Markdown).
The parenthetical "(only tables NOTHING ELSE!)" likely refers to the content of the table (i.e., don't put paragraphs of text in HTML, make it a table structure) OR it refers to a specific case where the user might expect an image description.
Let's re-read carefully: "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible".
This probably means: "If there is a table, output it as HTML. If there is a flowchart, output it as a table. Don't describe a table in markdown, use HTML."
Okay, I will use HTML for the slide content.
One detail: "Acute or chronic" is cyan. So `<i>` or `<b>`? The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". It doesn't mention italics. The PDF text has `<i>` for "Acute or chronic". The image has it in italics (slanted). The prompt says "try to match the text formatting as much as possible". I will use italics for the cyan text as well, or just bold? "formatted as bold". I will stick to bold to be safe, or maybe bold+italic if both apply. The prompt specifically says "formatted as bold". I will use `<b>`. Wait, looking at the image, "Acute or chronic" is definitely italicized. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". It doesn't forbid other formatting. I will use `<b><i>` for colored italics? Or just `<b>`?
"if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." -> This is a specific instruction for colored text. I will prioritize bold.
Actually, let's look at the instruction again: "Note that erros may occur with the pdf text, if it is obviously corrupted or error ridden text then ignore it !".
The PDF text has `<i>` for "Acute or chronic". This suggests italics are appropriate.
I will use `<b>` for the colored text as requested.
Let's refine the "12 different conditions" box. It has a black background. I won't replicate the background in HTML unless necessary, but I will make the text bold.
Let's refine the Slide 2 table.
The items in the right column "Periapical surgery" has sub-bullets.
- Curettage
- Apicoectomy
- Retrograde endodontics
I will put these in the same cell with `<br>- Curettage...`
One final check on the text "Internal infl. or repl. resorption".
PDF text: "Internal infl. or repl. resorption".
Image text: "Internal infl. or repl. resorption".
Matches.
Okay, ready to generate.
Structure:
1. Header (Markdown)
2. Slide 1 Table (HTML)
3. Slide 2 Table (HTML)
4. Footer (Markdown)
Wait, looking at the very bottom left "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and bottom right "Page 25". These are separate from the slides.
One detail: The red X over "Vital" and "Non-Vital". I will just transcribe the text "“Vital” Pulp" and "“Non-Vital” Pulp" as bold because they are colored (green/pink). The X is a graphic.
The prompt says: "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags."
This page is not "image only with labels or sparse text". It is a slide with substantial text. So I transcribe.
Let's double check the "Flowcharts as tables" part.
The slides have a left column (conditions) and right column (management) with arrows indicating a flow/range. A table is the best way to represent this.
I will formulate the HTML tables now.
Slide 1:
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"><b>"Vital" Pulp</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th><b>12 different conditions !!!</b></th>
<th><b>Management ranges from:</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clinically normal pulp</td>
<td>Nil</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sensitive dentine</td>
<td>Desensitisation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Reversible pulpitis<br><b>Acute or chronic</b></td>
<td>New restoration</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irreversible pulpitis<br><b>Acute or chronic</b></td>
<td>Conservative pulp therapy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Necrobiosis</td>
<td>Endodontics</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Three types of internal resorption</td>
<td>Extraction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp atrophy</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp hyperplasia</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Wait, the alignment in the image isn't perfect.
"Endodontics" is below "Conservative pulp therapy".
"Extraction" is at the bottom.
The list on the left is longer than the list on the right.
I will just put the items in the cells.
Slide 2:
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"><b>"Non-Vital" Pulp</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th><b>10 different conditions !!!</b></th>
<th><b>Management ranges from:</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clinically normal pulp<br><b>With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification</b></td>
<td>Nil</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Necrobiosis</td>
<td>Orthograde endodontics<br>- Different medicaments</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp Necrosis<br><b>With or Without Infection</b></td>
<td>Re-treatment</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulpless Infected Canal<br><b>With Apical Periodontitis</b></td>
<td>Periapical surgery<br>- Curettage<br>- Apicoectomy<br>- Retrograde endodontics</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Previous Endodontic Treatment<br><b>With or Without Infection</b></td>
<td>Extraction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internal infl. or repl. resorption</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
This looks good. I will ensure the HTML is clean.
One small thing: "12 different conditions !!!" is cyan. "10 different conditions !!!" is cyan.
"Management ranges from:" is pink/magenta.
So I should bold "Management ranges from:" too?
"if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold."
Yes, "Management ranges from:" is pink. So `<b>Management ranges from:</b>`.
"“Vital” Pulp" is green. `<b>"Vital" Pulp</b>`.
"“Non-Vital” Pulp" is pink. `<b>"Non-Vital" Pulp</b>`.
The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image...".
I will include the header and footer in Markdown.
Final check on "Internal infl. or repl. resorption".
In Slide 1, "Three types of internal resorption" is listed.
In Slide 2, "Internal infl. or repl. resorption" is listed.
This is consistent.
I'm ready. I will combine the text.
One detail: "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" is in the header.
"2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 25" are in the footer.
The prompt says "DO NOT ADD ANYTHING TO THE TEXT ITSELF".
So I must be careful not to add "Slide 1:" or "Slide 2:" labels unless they are in the image. They are not.
I will just output the content.
Wait, the prompt says "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)".
This might mean I should NOT use markdown for the lists inside the tables, but use `<br>` or nested lists `<ul>` inside `<td>`.
Standard HTML tables don't support Markdown.
So inside `<td>`, I will use `<br>` for line breaks.
For the bullet points in the image (like the red diamonds), I can use `- ` or `• ` or just newlines. The prompt says "flowcharts as tables".
I'll use `- ` to represent the bullets.
Let's refine the HTML table cells.
Cell 1, Row 3 (Conditions):
- Clinically normal pulp
- Sensitive dentine
...
I will format this as:
`- Clinically normal pulp<br>- Sensitive dentine<br>...`
This seems the most robust way to "Format tables in HTML".
One final check on colors.
"Vital" Pulp - Green.
"Non-Vital" Pulp - Pink.
"12 different conditions !!!" - Cyan.
"10 different conditions !!!" - Cyan.
"Management ranges from:" - Pink.
"Acute or chronic" - Cyan.
"With or Without..." - Cyan.
"With Apical Periodontitis" - Cyan.
I will apply `<b>` to all these.
The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold."
It doesn't say "only". So I can use italics too if it looks like italics.
"Acute or chronic" looks like italics.
"With or Without..." looks like italics.
So I will use `<b><i>` or just `<i>` if the bold instruction is specific.
"if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." -> This implies IF color, THEN bold. It doesn't say "AND keep italics". But "try to match the text formatting as much as possible".
I will use `<b>` for the colored text as the primary formatting instruction for color. I'll add `<i>` if it's clearly italicized text (which it is). So `<b><i>`.
Actually, looking closely at "Acute or chronic", it is cyan and italic.
Looking at "With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification", it is cyan and italic.
So I will use `<b><i>`.
Wait, the prompt says "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)".
This might be interpreted as "The output for the tables should be HTML tags, not Markdown tables".
Yes, that's what I planned.
Okay, let's write it out.
Header:
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
Table 1:
<table>
...
</table>
Table 2:
<table>
...
</table>
Footer:
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 25
I will ensure no extra text like "Here is the extracted text:" appears.
One detail: "12 different conditions !!!" has a black background in the image. I can't do background in simple HTML table without style, but I can't use CSS classes easily if not allowed. I'll just bold the text.
The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image...".
The PDF text has "" and "". These are bullet point characters. I will replace them with `-` or `•`.
Let's do this.
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"><b>“Vital” Pulp</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>12 different conditions !!!</b><br> Clinically normal pulp<br> Sensitive dentine<br> Reversible pulpitis<br> <i><b>Acute or chronic</b></i><br> Irreversible pulpitis<br> <i><b>Acute or chronic</b></i><br> Necrobiosis<br> Three types of internal resorption<br> Pulp atrophy<br> Pulp hyperplasia</td>
<td><b>Management ranges from:</b><br>Nil<br>Desensitisation<br>New restoration<br>Conservative pulp therapy<br>Endodontics<br>Extraction</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2"><b>“Non-Vital” Pulp</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Could be several different conditions which require very different clinical management:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>10 different conditions !!!</b><br> Clinically normal pulp<br> <i><b>With or Without Pulp Canal Calcification</b></i><br> Necrobiosis<br> Pulp Necrosis<br> <i><b>With or Without Infection</b></i><br> Pulpless Infected Canal<br> <i><b>With Apical Periodontitis</b></i><br> Previous Endodontic Treatment<br> <i><b>With or Without Infection</b></i><br> Internal infl. or repl. resorption</td>
<td><b>Management ranges from:</b><br>Nil<br>Orthograde endodontics<br> - Different medicaments<br>Re-treatment<br>Periapical surgery<br> - Curettage<br> - Apicoectomy<br> - Retrograde endodontics<br>Extraction</td>
</tr>
</table>
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 25
#### Diagnostic Complexity and Management Spectrums
Both "Vital" and "Non-vital" labels encompass numerous distinct conditions requiring different clinical approaches.
| Classification | Conditions (Differential Diagnosis) | Management Range |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **"Vital" Pulp** | - Clinically normal pulp<br>- Sensitive dentine<br>- **Reversible pulpitis** (Acute or chronic)<br>- **Irreversible pulpitis** (Acute or chronic)<br>- Necrobiosis<br>- Three types of internal resorption<br>- Pulp atrophy<br>- Pulp hyperplasia | - Nil<br>- Desensitisation<br>- New restoration<br>- Conservative pulp therapy<br>- Endodontics<br>- Extraction |
| **"Non-Vital" Pulp** | - Clinically normal pulp (**With/Without Calcification**)<br>- Necrobiosis<br>- **Pulp Necrosis** (With/Without Infection)<br>- **Pulpless Infected Canal** (With Apical Periodontitis)<br>- **Previous Endodontic Treatment** (With/Without Infection)<br>- Internal inflammatory or replacement resorption | - Nil<br>- Orthograde endodontics (various medicaments)<br>- Re-treatment<br>- Periapical surgery (Curettage, Apicoectomy, Retrograde endodontics)<br>- Extraction |
![]()
A slide titled 'Vital' Pulp listing 12 conditions such as clinically normal pulp, sensitive dentine, and reversible/irreversible pulpitis, alongside management options ranging from nil to extraction.
![]()
A slide titled 'Non-Vital' Pulp listing 10 conditions including pulp necrosis and pulpless infected canal, alongside management options ranging from orthograde endodontics to extraction.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions** | **Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
***
**AAE Consensus Conference Recommended Diagnostic Terminology.**
**J Endod 2009; 35: 1634.**
1. Normal pulp
2. Reversible pulpitis
3. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
4. Asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis
5. Pulp necrosis
6. Previously treated
7. Previously initiated therapy
***
**Terminology**
**??? Symptomatic** | **??? Asymptomatic**
* **Not descriptive enough to indicate the management required**
* **“Symptomatic” could be many conditions - ranging from having mild pain to severe pain**
* **e.g. chronic reversible pulpitis; acute irreversible pulpitis**
| Condition | Treatment |
| :--- | :--- |
| **chronic reversible pulpitis** | **Rx - Restoration** |
| **acute irreversible pulpitis** | **Rx - Endodontics or Extraction** |
***
**2nd Year DMD - 2023** | **Page 26**
#### AAE Consensus Terminology (2009)
The AAE Consensus Conference recommended the following diagnostic terms:
1. Normal pulp
2. Reversible pulpitis
3. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
4. Asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis
5. Pulp necrosis
6. Previously treated
7. Previously initiated therapy
#### Critiques of Consensus Terminology
- **Symptomatic vs. Asymptomatic:**
- These terms are not descriptive enough to indicate required management.
- "Symptomatic" can cover a wide range of conditions from mild to severe pain (e.g., chronic reversible pulpitis vs. acute irreversible pulpitis).
| Condition | Treatment Requirement |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Chronic reversible pulpitis** | Rx: Restoration |
| **Acute irreversible pulpitis** | Rx: Endodontics or Extraction |
![]()
A small inset image showing a page from the 'J Endod 2009; 35: 1634' article regarding AAE Consensus Conference Recommended Diagnostic Terminology.
![]()
A diagram illustrating the ambiguity of the terms 'Symptomatic' vs 'Asymptomatic' by linking 'chronic reversible pulpitis' to Rx - Restoration and 'acute irreversible pulpitis' to Rx - Endodontics or Extraction.
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
## **Terminology**
??? **Symptomatic** ??? **Asymptomatic**
* **Not descriptive enough to indicate the management required**
* **“Symptomatic” could be many conditions - ranging from having mild pain to severe pain**
* *e.g. chronic reversible pulpitis; acute irreversible pulpitis*
* **“Asymptomatic” could be several different conditions**
* *e.g. clinically normal pulp; necrotic & infected pulp*
<table>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; border: 2px solid #00ff00; background-color: #003300; color: #00ffff; padding: 5px;"><b>R<sub>x</sub> - NIL</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center; border: 2px solid #ff0000; background-color: #003300; color: #ffcc00; padding: 5px;"><b>R<sub>x</sub> - Endodontics or Extraction</b></td>
</tr>
</table>
## **Terminology**
??? **Symptomatic** ??? **Asymptomatic**
* **Not descriptive enough to indicate the management required**
* **Inconsistent with terminology used in other areas of Dentistry**
* *e.g. acute ulcerative gingivitis, chronic marginal periodontitis, etc.*
* **Inconsistent with terminology used in Medicine**
* *e.g. acute appendicitis, chronic maxillary sinusitis, etc.*
---
**2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 27
#### Limitations in Clinical Application
- **Vagueness of "Symptomatic" and "Asymptomatic":**
- "Symptomatic" may range from mild to severe pain (e.g., chronic reversible vs. acute irreversible pulpitis).
- "Asymptomatic" can describe vastly different states, such as a clinically normal pulp versus a necrotic and infected pulp.
#### Management Discrepancies
- **Rx - NIL:** Appropriate for some asymptomatic conditions (e.g., normal pulp).
- **Rx - Endodontics or Extraction:** Required for other asymptomatic conditions (e.g., necrotic/infected pulp).
#### Professional Inconsistencies
- The current AAE terminology is inconsistent with other fields of dentistry (e.g., "acute ulcerative gingivitis" or "chronic marginal periodontitis").
- It is inconsistent with general medical terminology (e.g., "acute appendicitis" or "chronic maxillary sinusitis").
![]()
This diagram illustrates the ambiguity of dental terminology 'Symptomatic' and 'Asymptomatic' regarding pulp conditions, visually linking them to different management outcomes such as 'Rx - NIL' or 'Endodontics or Extraction'.
![]()
This figure displays a slide discussing terminology inconsistencies, noting that terms like 'Symptomatic' are insufficient for indicating management and are inconsistent with terminology used in other areas of Dentistry and Medicine.
The user wants me to extract text from the provided image.
I need to look at both the "PDF Text" provided in the prompt and the image itself.
The prompt says "Prioritize image text but use PDF text for context to enhance the ocr".
It also specifies formatting rules:
- Match text formatting (colors -> bold).
- Format tables as HTML.
- Format flowcharts as tables.
- If it's an image with sparse text/labels, describe it in ` tags."
There is a small image of the paper in the second box. It's a thumbnail of the article. It has text but it's too small to read. It's essentially an image of the article cover. I should probably describe it or ignore the text inside it if it's illegible. The prompt says "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure". This applies to the whole page, but here we have text slides. The small image is just an illustration. I will ignore the text inside the small thumbnail as it is illegible and part of an image.
Let's double check the colors in Bullet 3.
".... little validity other than empiricism."
In the image, "little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
Wait, looking really closely at crop 1, "little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
However, in Bullet 1, "Little if any support" is yellow.
In Bullet 2, "crept into usage with no scientific basis" is yellow.
In Bullet 4, "minimal rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Is it possible that "little validity" is also yellow but just looks washed out? Or maybe it's just white.
Let's look at the PDF text provided.
`“Little if any support in the historic or contemporary peer-reviewed literature for the use of the terms ‘symptomatic’ and ‘asymptomatic’ ’’`
`“These terms have crept into usage with no scientific basis”`
`“…. little validity other than empiricism.”`
`“…minimal rationale or scientific basis.”`
The PDF text doesn't help with color.
Let's assume the rule "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold" applies strictly.
So:
- "Little if any support" -> Bold
- "crept into usage with no scientific basis" -> Bold
- "empiricism" -> Bold (if white) or maybe the whole phrase if it's yellow. Let's look at the full image again.
Actually, looking at the full image, "little validity" looks like a very faint yellow or white. "empiricism" is bright yellow.
Wait, let's look at the fourth bullet. "minimal rationale or scientific basis". "minimal rationale" looks white? No, "minimal rationale" looks white in the first crop? No, "minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow?
Let's look really closely at the first crop.
Bullet 4: "...minimal rationale or scientific basis."
"minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Wait, no. "minimal rationale or scientific basis" seems to be all yellow in the third crop?
Let's look at the third crop.
Bullet 4: "...minimal rationale or scientific basis."
The text "minimal rationale or scientific basis" is yellow/orange.
Bullet 3: ".... little validity other than empiricism."
"little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
Bullet 2: "These terms have crept into usage with no scientific basis"
"These terms have " is white. "crept into usage with no scientific basis" is yellow.
Bullet 1: "Little if any support" is yellow. The rest is white.
Okay, so I will bold the yellow parts.
Revised plan:
**From: Gutmann et al - JoE 2009** (Green)
***Review article and AAE Consensus Conference*** (Yellow)
**“Little if any support** in the historic or contemporary peer-reviewed literature for the use of the terms ‘symptomatic’ and ‘asymptomatic’ ”
“These terms have **crept into usage with no scientific basis**”
“.... little validity other than **empiricism**.” (Wait, looking at crop 1 again... "little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow. But wait, is "other than" yellow? No. Just "empiricism".)
Actually, looking at the very bottom bullet in crop 1: "...minimal rationale or scientific basis."
"minimal" is white? No, "minimal" looks white. "rationale or scientific basis" looks yellow.
Let's look at the full image again.
Bullet 4: "...minimal rationale or scientific basis."
"minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Let's look at Bullet 3 again.
".... little validity other than empiricism."
"little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
This seems like a consistent pattern: highlighting the key negative phrases.
Bullet 1: "Little if any support"
Bullet 2: "crept into usage with no scientific basis"
Bullet 3: "empiricism" (maybe "little validity other than empiricism" is the phrase, but only "empiricism" is yellow? Or maybe "little validity" is also yellow but dim?)
Actually, looking at the full image, "little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
Bullet 4: "minimal rationale or scientific basis" -> "minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Let's re-examine Bullet 4 in the full image.
"...minimal rationale or scientific basis."
The text "minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Let's re-examine Bullet 1.
"Little if any support" is yellow. The rest is white.
Let's re-examine Bullet 2.
"These terms have " is white. "crept into usage with no scientific basis" is yellow.
Okay, I will follow this pattern.
One detail: The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
So:
- Bullet 1: **Little if any support**
- Bullet 2: **crept into usage with no scientific basis**
- Bullet 3: **empiricism** (and maybe "little validity" if it's yellow... let's assume only "empiricism" is yellow based on visual intensity). Wait, looking at the PDF text, the bullet point starts with `“.... little validity other than empiricism.”`. The quotes are white.
- Bullet 4: **rationale or scientific basis** (and maybe "minimal" is white).
Actually, looking at the third crop, "minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Wait, let's look at the third crop again.
The text is: `“...minimal rationale or scientific basis.”`
"minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Let's look at the first crop again.
Bullet 1: `“Little if any support` is yellow.
Bullet 2: `“These terms have crept into usage with no scientific basis”` -> "These terms have " is white. "crept into usage with no scientific basis" is yellow.
Bullet 3: `“.... little validity other than empiricism.”` -> ".... little validity other than " is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
Bullet 4: `“...minimal rationale or scientific basis.”` -> "...minimal " is white. "rationale or scientific basis." is yellow.
This seems like the most accurate transcription of the colors.
However, looking at the full image, the yellow text is quite dominant in bullets 2, 3, 4.
Bullet 2: "crept into usage with no scientific basis" is definitely yellow.
Bullet 3: "little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
Bullet 4: "minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Wait, looking at Bullet 3 in the full image... "little validity" looks like it *might* be a very light yellow. But "empiricism" is bright yellow.
Let's look at the PDF text provided. It doesn't indicate color.
I will stick to the visual evidence.
Bullet 3: "little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
One correction: The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
So I will bold the colored parts.
Let's look at the header of the first box.
"From: Gutmann et al - JoE 2009" is Green. -> **From: Gutmann et al - JoE 2009**
"Review article and AAE Consensus Conference" is Yellow. -> ***Review article and AAE Consensus Conference***
Let's look at the second box.
Title: All yellow. -> ***Assessment of Australian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis***
Journal: Cyan. -> ***J Endod 2020; 46: 483-489.***
The small image in the second box: "Assessment of Australian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis". It's a thumbnail. I will ignore the text inside it as per instructions "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure". The thumbnail has text, but it's the title of the paper. I will just ignore it and transcribe the main slide text.
Final check on the text content.
Bullet 1: "Little if any support in the historic or contemporary peer-reviewed literature for the use of the terms ‘symptomatic’ and ‘asymptomatic’ " (Note the closing quote in PDF is ‘’’. Image has ’’). I will use the image text.
Bullet 2: "These terms have crept into usage with no scientific basis"
Bullet 3: ".... little validity other than empiricism."
Bullet 4: "...minimal rationale or scientific basis."
The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr".
The PDF text has `` which are the bullets. I should probably use bullets or the symbol provided. The prompt output usually prefers standard markdown bullets `•` or `-`. I will use `•` or just the text if it's a list. The PDF text uses ``. I'll use `•` for standard markdown list or just the text if it's not strictly a list. The prompt says "Format tables in HTML...". This is not a table. I will use standard markdown bullets.
Wait, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
So:
**Little if any support** in the historic...
These terms have **crept into usage with no scientific basis**
.... little validity other than **empiricism**.
...**minimal rationale or scientific basis**. (Wait, looking at crop 3, "minimal" is white. "rationale..." is yellow).
Actually, let's look at Bullet 4 in the full image again.
"...minimal rationale or scientific basis."
"minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow.
Wait, looking really closely at the full image, "minimal" looks like it could be a very light yellow. But "rationale" is definitely saturated yellow.
Let's assume "minimal" is white.
Let's look at Bullet 3 again.
".... little validity other than empiricism."
"little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
Okay, I'm confident in this color mapping.
One final check on the header.
"Pulp and Root Canal Conditions" - Black.
"Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" - Black.
"2nd Year DMD - 2023" - Black.
"Page 28" - Black.
The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This implies the default is black/white, and "different" means non-standard or highlighted colors.
So the header text is black, so no bolding unless it's distinct. It looks like standard black text.
The box headers are Green/Yellow, so Bold.
The bullet highlights are Yellow/Orange, so Bold.
The second box title is Yellow, so Bold.
The second box journal info is Cyan, so Bold.
Let's write it out.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
**From: Gutmann et al - JoE 2009**
***Review article and AAE Consensus Conference***
• “**Little if any support** in the historic or contemporary peer-reviewed literature for the use of the terms ‘symptomatic’ and ‘asymptomatic’ ”
• “These terms have **crept into usage with no scientific basis**”
• “.... little validity other than **empiricism**.”
• “... **minimal rationale or scientific basis**.” (Wait, looking at crop 3, "minimal" is white. "rationale" is yellow. Wait, looking at the very bottom bullet in the first crop... "minimal" is white. "rationale or scientific basis" is yellow. But in the full image, "minimal" looks white. Let's assume "minimal" is white.)
Actually, let's look at the PDF text provided for bullet 4: `“…minimal rationale or scientific basis.”`
It doesn't highlight "minimal".
Let's look at the first crop again.
The text is `“...minimal rationale or scientific basis.”`
The word "minimal" is white. "rationale" is yellow.
So: `“...minimal **rationale or scientific basis**.”`
Wait, let's look at bullet 3 again.
`“.... little validity other than empiricism.”`
"little validity" is white. "empiricism" is yellow.
So: `“.... little validity other than **empiricism**.”`
Let's look at bullet 2 again.
`“These terms have crept into usage with no scientific basis”`
"These terms have " is white. "crept into usage with no scientific basis" is yellow.
So: `“These terms have **crept into usage with no scientific basis**”`
Let's look at bullet 1 again.
`“Little if any support in the historic...`
"Little if any support" is yellow.
So: `“**Little if any support** in the historic...`
Okay, that seems consistent.
One detail: "Review article and AAE Consensus Conference" is italicized in the image. I should add italics. And it's yellow, so bold. So `***Review article and AAE Consensus Conference***`.
One detail: "From: Gutmann et al - JoE 2009" is Green. So Bold.
One detail: The second box title. "Assessment of Australian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis". It is yellow and looks slightly handwritten or script-like font? No, it's a serif font, maybe Georgia? It looks like a standard serif font but bold. And yellow. So `***Assessment of Australian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis***`.
One detail: "J Endod 2020; 46: 483-489." is Cyan. So Bold. `***J Endod 2020; 46: 483-489.***`.
The authors: "Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV." is white. No bold.
The small image: I will not transcribe text from it.
The footer: "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 28".
Let's assemble.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
**From: Gutmann et al - JoE 2009**
***Review article and AAE Consensus Conference***
• “**Little if any support** in the historic or contemporary peer-reviewed literature for the use of the terms ‘symptomatic’ and ‘asymptomatic’ ”
• “These terms have **crept into usage with no scientific basis**”
• “.... little validity other than **empiricism**.”
• “...**minimal rationale or scientific basis**.”
***Assessment of Australian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis***
Bestall S, Flynn R,
Charleson G, Abbott PV.
***J Endod 2020; 46: 483-489.***
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 28
#### Scientific Critique of Current Standards
**From: Gutmann et al - JoE 2009 (Review article and AAE Consensus Conference)**
- "**Little if any support** in the historic or contemporary peer-reviewed literature for the use of the terms ‘symptomatic’ and ‘asymptomatic’."
- "These terms have **crept into usage with no scientific basis**."
- ".... little validity other than **empiricism**."
- "... **minimal rationale or scientific basis**."
#### Supporting Research
**Assessment of Australian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
- **Authors:** Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV.
- **Source:** J Endod 2020; 46: 483-489.
![]()
A thumbnail figure showing the cover page of the article 'Assessment of Australian Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis'.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions** **Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
---
**Dentists’ Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
**Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020**
- Surveyed 194 dentists
- Provided radiographs and diagnoses of 14 cases
- **Different diagnostic terminology for the same condition**
- Instructed to assume all teeth were suitable for the management options given
- Asked what management they would recommend
- **e.g. Review, RCT, Re-RCT, Extraction, Surgery, etc.**
- **- depending on the particular case**
---
**Dentists’ Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
**Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020**
- Responses were grouped as:
- **“Operative”** or **“Non-Operative”** **Management**
- **i.e. To treat or not to treat !**
- Compared for statistical significance:
- **“Chronic”** -v- **“Asymptomatic”**
- **“Acute”** -v- **“Symptomatic”**
---
**2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 29
#### Dentists’ Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis
**Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020**
- Surveyed 194 dentists
- Provided radiographs and diagnoses of 14 cases
- **Different diagnostic terminology for the same condition**
- Instructed to assume all teeth were suitable for the management options given
- Asked what management they would recommend
- e.g. Review, RCT, Re-RCT, Extraction, Surgery, etc.
- Depending on the particular case
#### Management Classification
- Responses were grouped as:
- **“Operative”** or **“Non-Operative” Management**
- i.e. To treat or not to treat!
- Compared for statistical significance:
- **“Chronic”** -v- **“Asymptomatic”**
- **“Acute”** -v- **“Symptomatic”**
![]()
A presentation slide titled 'Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis' summarizing a survey of 194 dentists regarding radiographs and diagnoses of 14 cases, listing management options like Review, RCT, and Extraction.
![]()
A continuation slide describing how dentist responses were grouped into 'Operative' or 'Non-Operative' management and comparing diagnostic conditions like 'Chronic' versus 'Asymptomatic' for statistical significance.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions** \
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
**Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - *J Endod* 2020**
**% of Dentists That Would Treat**
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">Condition</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">"Chronic"</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">"Asymptomatic"</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">Significance</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Irreversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">93.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">59.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Apical Periodontitis</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">96.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">89.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Apical Abscess</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">99.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">83.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
**Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
**Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - *J Endod* 2020**
**% of Dentists That Would Treat**
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">Condition</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">"Acute"</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">"Symptomatic"</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">Significance</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Irreversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">99.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">96.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: blue;"><b>No</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Apical Periodontitis</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1° - 83.0%</td>
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;">97.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">2° - 100%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: blue;"><b>No</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Apical Abscess</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1° - 82.0%</td>
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;">93.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">2° - 96.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
**2nd Year DMD - 2023** \
Page 30
#### Treatment Decisions: Chronic vs. Asymptomatic
**Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020**
**% of Dentists That Would Treat**
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">Condition</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">"Chronic"</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">"Asymptomatic"</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">Significance</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Irreversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">93.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">59.8%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Apical Periodontitis</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">96.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">89.7%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Apical Abscess</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">99.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">83.5%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
#### Treatment Decisions: Acute vs. Symptomatic
**% of Dentists That Would Treat**
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">Condition</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">"Acute"</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">"Symptomatic"</th>
<th style="background-color: #1E90FF; color: yellow; text-align: center;">Significance</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Irreversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">99.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">96.9%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: blue;"><b>No</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Apical Periodontitis</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1° - 83.0%</td>
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;">97.0%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">2° - 100%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: blue;"><b>No</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;"><b>Apical Abscess</b></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1° - 82.0%</td>
<td rowspan="2" style="text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;">93.3%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;">2° - 96.4%</td>
<td style="text-align: center; color: red;"><b>Yes</b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
![]()
This table presents data from a study by Bestall et al. (2020) regarding dentists' treatment planning decisions. It lists the percentage of dentists willing to treat 'Irreversible Pulpitis', 'Apical Periodontitis', and 'Apical Abscess' under 'Chronic' versus 'Asymptomatic' diagnoses, noting significant differences in treatment rates.
![]()
This second table continues the study on treatment planning decisions, comparing treatment percentages for conditions labeled 'Acute' versus 'Symptomatic'. It breaks down 'Apical Periodontitis' and 'Apical Abscess' into primary (1°) and secondary (2°) stages, showing varying treatment acceptance rates.
The user wants me to extract text from an image of a slide presentation.
I need to follow specific formatting rules:
- Prioritize image text.
- Use PDF text for context but ignore corrupted PDF text.
- Match text formatting (bold for different colors).
- Format tables as HTML.
- Format flowcharts as tables.
- Handle sparse text/images as descriptions in `<img>` tags.
- Output only the transcribed text in Markdown (except for HTML tables).
- Do not add any conversational filler.
**Step 1: Analyze the Image Structure**
The image consists of a header, a main slide area (which appears twice, likely a duplicate or two parts of the same slide deck), and a footer.
- **Header:** "Pulp and Root Canal Conditions" and "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO"
- **Main Content (Blue Box 1):**
- Title: "Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis"
- Citation: "Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020"
- Bullet points about treatment decisions (Chronic vs Asymptomatic, Acute vs Symptomatic, specific conditions).
- **Main Content (Blue Box 2 - effectively the second slide or continuation):**
- Title: "Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis"
- Citation: "Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020"
- Big bold text: "Words DO matter !!!"
- Conclusions section.
- Recommendation: "AVOID using..."
- **Footer:** "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 31"
**Step 2: Transcribe and Format Text**
*Header:*
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
*First Blue Box:*
Title (Yellow): Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis
Citation (Light Blue): Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020
Bullet 1 (Pink diamond): Dentists were more likely to treat if “chronic” than “asymptomatic” (Note: "chronic" is yellow, "asymptomatic" is yellow). Wait, looking closely at the image, "chronic" is yellow/orange, "asymptomatic" is yellow/orange. The instruction says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
- "chronic" -> **chronic**
- "asymptomatic" -> **asymptomatic**
Bullet 2 (Pink diamond): Dentists were more likely to treat if “acute” than “symptomatic”
- "acute" -> **acute**
- "symptomatic" -> **symptomatic**
Sub-bullet 1 (Yellow square): But slightly less significant (Text is light blue/cyan). Instruction says "different colour... bold". This is a distinct color. I will bold it.
- **But slightly less significant**
Sub-bullet 2 (Yellow square): And NOT if Irreversible Pulpitis or 2° Acute Apical Abscess (Text is light blue/cyan).
- **And NOT if Irreversible Pulpitis or 2° Acute Apical Abscess**
Sub-bullet 3 (Yellow square): And the OPPOSITE for 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis and Abscess (Text is light blue/cyan).
- **And the OPPOSITE for 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis and Abscess**
*Second Blue Box:*
Title (Yellow): Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis
Citation (Light Blue): Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020
Big Text (Yellow inside black box): **Words DO matter !!!** (With a star icon).
Header: **CONCLUSIONS**
Bullet 1 (Yellow square): Dentists base their treatment decisions largely on the presence or absence of symptoms (Text is light blue/cyan). -> **Dentists base their treatment decisions largely on the presence or absence of symptoms**
Sub-bullet (Orange arrow): And not on the actual condition / disease present (Text is orange). -> **And not on the actual condition / disease present**
Sub-bullet (Orange arrow): Suggests poor understanding of pulp, root canal & periapical conditions (Text is orange). -> **Suggests poor understanding of pulp, root canal & periapical conditions**
Bullet 2 (Yellow square): AVOID using “Asymptomatic” and “Symptomatic”
- "AVOID" is green. -> **AVOID**
- "Asymptomatic" is orange. -> **Asymptomatic**
- "Symptomatic" is orange. -> **Symptomatic**
- So: **AVOID** using **Asymptomatic** and **Symptomatic**
*Footer:*
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 31
**Step 3: Refine Formatting**
The prompt asks to match text formatting as much as possible, and if text is in a different color, format as bold.
The prompt asks to format tables in HTML. There are no strict tables, just bullet points. I will use standard Markdown bullets.
The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr".
Let's look at the colors again to ensure I catch the bolding correctly.
- "chronic", "asymptomatic" -> Yellow/Gold. Bold.
- "acute", "symptomatic" -> Yellow/Gold. Bold.
- "But slightly less significant" -> Cyan/Light Blue. Bold.
- "And NOT if Irreversible Pulpitis or 2° Acute Apical Abscess" -> Cyan/Light Blue. Bold.
- "And the OPPOSITE for 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis and Abscess" -> Cyan/Light Blue. Bold.
- "Words DO matter !!!" -> Yellow. Bold.
- "CONCLUSIONS" -> White (boldish).
- "Dentists base their treatment decisions..." -> Cyan/Light Blue. Bold.
- "And not on the actual condition..." -> Orange. Bold.
- "Suggests poor understanding..." -> Orange. Bold.
- "AVOID" -> Green. Bold.
- "Asymptomatic" -> Orange. Bold.
- "Symptomatic" -> Orange. Bold.
Wait, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This applies to the extracted text.
Let's assemble the final output. I will treat the two blue boxes as a continuous flow since they are part of the same slide deck content, but visually they are distinct blocks. I'll present them sequentially.
**Drafting the content:**
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
**Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - *J Endod 2020*
* Dentists were more likely to treat if **“chronic”** than **“asymptomatic”**
* Dentists were more likely to treat if **“acute”** than **“symptomatic”**
* But slightly less significant
* And NOT if Irreversible Pulpitis or 2° Acute Apical Abscess
* And the OPPOSITE for 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis and Abscess
**Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - *J Endod 2020*
**Words DO matter !!!**
**CONCLUSIONS**
* Dentists base their treatment decisions largely on the presence or absence of symptoms
* And not on the actual condition / disease present
* Suggests poor understanding of pulp, root canal & periapical conditions
* **AVOID** using **“Asymptomatic”** and **“Symptomatic”**
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
Page 31
*Self-Correction on "Bold":* The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold".
- In the first box:
- "chronic" and "asymptomatic" are yellow/orange.
- "acute" and "symptomatic" are yellow/orange.
- The sub-bullets are cyan.
- In the second box:
- "Words DO matter !!!" is yellow.
- "Dentists base..." is cyan.
- "And not on..." and "Suggests poor..." are orange.
- "AVOID" is green.
- "Asymptomatic" and "Symptomatic" are orange.
I will apply bolding to these specific colored segments.
One detail: "2°" and "1°" are superscripts in the image. I should try to represent that, though plain text is usually acceptable. The PDF text has "2°" and "1°". I will use standard text or HTML sup if needed, but standard text is safer for markdown unless specifically requested. The prompt says "match the text formatting as much as possible". Superscript is formatting. I'll use `&deg;` or just regular text if it's clearer. Actually, looking at the PDF text provided in the prompt: "2° Acute Apical Abscess". It uses the degree symbol. I will stick to the text content.
Let's refine the specific bolding.
- "chronic", "asymptomatic" -> **chronic**, **asymptomatic**
- "acute", "symptomatic" -> **acute**, **symptomatic**
- "But slightly less significant" -> **But slightly less significant**
- "And NOT if Irreversible Pulpitis or 2° Acute Apical Abscess" -> **And NOT if Irreversible Pulpitis or 2° Acute Apical Abscess**
- "And the OPPOSITE for 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis and Abscess" -> **And the OPPOSITE for 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis and Abscess**
- "Words DO matter !!!" -> **Words DO matter !!!**
- "Dentists base their treatment decisions largely on the presence or absence of symptoms" -> **Dentists base their treatment decisions largely on the presence or absence of symptoms**
- "And not on the actual condition / disease present" -> **And not on the actual condition / disease present**
- "Suggests poor understanding of pulp, root canal & periapical conditions" -> **Suggests poor understanding of pulp, root canal & periapical conditions**
- "AVOID" -> **AVOID**
- "Asymptomatic", "Symptomatic" -> **Asymptomatic**, **Symptomatic**
The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". It implies *all* text that is in a different color (i.e., not the base white/light blue). The base text seems to be white for headers and light blue for body text in the second box? No, in the first box, the main bullets are white, but the words "chronic", "asymptomatic" etc are yellow. The sub bullets are light blue.
Actually, looking really closely at crop 1:
- "Dentists were more likely to treat if" is white.
- "chronic" is yellow/orange.
- "asymptomatic" is yellow/orange.
- "Dentists were more likely to treat if" (second bullet) is white.
- "acute" is yellow/orange.
- "symptomatic" is yellow/orange.
- "But slightly less significant" is light blue.
- "And NOT if..." is light blue.
- "And the OPPOSITE..." is light blue.
In crop 3 (second box):
- "Words DO matter !!!" is yellow.
- "CONCLUSIONS" is white.
- "Dentists base their treatment decisions..." is light blue.
- "And not on..." is orange.
- "Suggests poor..." is orange.
- "AVOID" is green.
- "using" is white? No, "using" looks white/light grey.
- "Asymptomatic" is orange.
- "and" is white.
- "Symptomatic" is orange.
Okay, I will bold the colored text as requested.
Final check on the table instruction: "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)". There are no tables here. Just bullet points.
"flowcharts as tables as best as possible". There are no flowcharts.
"if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description...". The whole image is text. I will transcribe it all.
One small thing: "Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" is in the header.
"Pulp and Root Canal Conditions" is in the header.
"2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 31" are in the footer.
I will structure it logically.
One final check on the text:
"Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020"
The "J Endod 2020" is italicized in the image. I should probably italicize it.
Let's write the final output.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions**
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
***
**Dentists’ Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - *J Endod 2020*
* Dentists were more likely to treat if **“chronic”** than **“asymptomatic”**
* Dentists were more likely to treat if **“acute”** than **“symptomatic”**
* But slightly less significant
* And NOT if Irreversible Pulpitis or 2° Acute Apical Abscess
* And the OPPOSITE for 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis and Abscess
***
**Dentists’ Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis**
Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - *J Endod 2020*
**Words DO matter !!!**
**CONCLUSIONS**
* Dentists base their treatment decisions largely on the presence or absence of symptoms
* And not on the actual condition / disease present
* Suggests poor understanding of pulp, root canal & periapical conditions
* **AVOID** using **“Asymptomatic”** and **“Symptomatic”**
***
**2nd Year DMD - 2023**
Page 31
#### Impact of Terminology on Treatment Planning
**Bestall S, Flynn R, Charleson G, Abbott PV. - J Endod 2020**
- Dentists were more likely to treat if **“chronic”** than **“asymptomatic”**
- Dentists were more likely to treat if **“acute”** than **“symptomatic”**
- **But slightly less significant**
- **And NOT if Irreversible Pulpitis or 2° Acute Apical Abscess**
- **And the OPPOSITE for 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis and Abscess**
**Words DO matter !!!**
#### Conclusions
- **Dentists base their treatment decisions largely on the presence or absence of symptoms**
- **And not on the actual condition / disease present**
- **Suggests poor understanding of pulp, root canal & periapical conditions**
- **AVOID** using **Asymptomatic** and **Symptomatic**
![]()
Presentation slide titled 'Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis' citing Bestall et al. (2020), which highlights that dentists are more likely to treat 'chronic' conditions over 'asymptomatic' and 'acute' conditions over 'symptomatic' cases.
![]()
Presentation slide titled 'Dentists' Treatment Planning Decisions Based on Diagnosis' featuring the bold conclusion 'Words DO matter !!!', stating that dentists base decisions on symptoms rather than actual disease and advising to avoid the terms 'Asymptomatic' and 'Symptomatic'.
# Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
**Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
---
### AAE Consensus Conference Recommended Diagnostic Terminology.
*J Endod 2009; 35: 1634.*
<table>
<tr>
<td>1. Normal pulp</td>
<td style="text-align:center; background-color:black; color:white; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid red;">7 Conditions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2. Reversible pulpitis</td>
<td rowspan="6"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4. Asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5. Pulp necrosis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6. Previously treated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7. Previously initiated therapy</td>
</tr>
</table>
<img src="placeholder_thumbnail_aae_doc.jpg" alt="Thumbnail of AAE Consensus Conference document"/>
---
### Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - Abbott & Yu ADJ 2007
<table>
<tr>
<td>Clinically normal pulp</td>
<td style="text-align:center; background-color:black; color:white; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid red;">17 Conditions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Reversible pulpitis &#8594; Acute &#9670; Chronic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irreversible pulpitis &#8594; Acute &#9670; Chronic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp necrobiosis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp necrosis &#8594; Infected &#9670; No sign of Infection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulpless and infected root canal system</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Previous Endodontic Treatment &#8594; Infected RCS &#9670; No signs of infection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp atrophy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp canal calcification</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp hyperplasia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internal resorption &#8594; Surface &#9670; Inflammatory &#9670; Replacement</td>
</tr>
</table>
<img src="placeholder_thumbnail_aaj_cover.jpg" alt="Thumbnail of Australian Dental Journal Endodontics Supplements"/>
---
**2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&
#### Comparison of Diagnostic Terminology Systems
**AAE Consensus Conference Recommended Diagnostic Terminology (J Endod 2009; 35: 1634)**
<table>
<tr>
<td>1. Normal pulp</td>
<td style="text-align:center; background-color:black; color:white; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid red;">7 Conditions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2. Reversible pulpitis</td>
<td rowspan="6"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4. Asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5. Pulp necrosis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6. Previously treated</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7. Previously initiated therapy</td>
</tr>
</table>
**Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - Abbott & Yu ADJ 2007**
<table>
<tr>
<td>Clinically normal pulp</td>
<td style="text-align:center; background-color:black; color:white; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid red;">17 Conditions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Reversible pulpitis &rarr; Acute &#9670; Chronic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irreversible pulpitis &rarr; Acute &#9670; Chronic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp necrobiosis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp necrosis &rarr; Infected &#9670; No sign of Infection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulpless and infected root canal system</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Previous Endodontic Treatment &rarr; Infected RCS &#9670; No signs of infection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp atrophy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp canal calcification</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp hyperplasia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internal resorption &rarr; Surface &#9670; Inflammatory &#9670; Replacement</td>
</tr>
</table>
![]()
A blue slide titled 'AAE Consensus Conference Recommended Diagnostic Terminology' listing 7 conditions including Normal pulp, Reversible pulpitis, Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, Asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis, Pulp necrosis, Previously treated, and Previously initiated therapy, referencing J Endod 2009.
![]()
A blue slide titled 'Pulp & Root Canal Conditions - Abbott & Yu ADJ 2007' listing 17 conditions such as Clinically normal pulp, Reversible/Irreversible pulpitis (Acute/Chronic), Pulp necrosis (Infected/No sign of Infection), and others, organized with arrows indicating classification.
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Abbott & Yu -v- AAE</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>~~Clinically normal pulp~~</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Reversible pulpitis →</td>
<td>Acute - Chronic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irreversible pulpitis →</td>
<td>~~Acute - Chronic~~ Symptomatic - Asymptomatic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp necrobiosis</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp necrosis →</td>
<td>Infected (???) - No sign of Infection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulpless and infected root canal system</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Previous Endodontic Treatment →</td>
<td>Infected RCS (???) - No signs of infection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp atrophy</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp canal calcification</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp hyperplasia</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internal resorption →</td>
<td>Surface - Inflammatory - Replacement</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #000; color: yellow;">The AAE Classification has a <u>SHORTFALL</u> of 10 conditions that have been shown to occur - plus <u>INAPPROPRIATE</u> terminology !!!</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Diagnosis of Pulp/Canal Status</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Pulpitis</b></td>
<td><b>Reversible or Irreversible</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Based on:<br>Severity of symptoms<br>Duration of symptoms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center;">Mainly with temperature changes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Infected Canal</b></td>
<td><b>Necrosis, Pulpless or RFd</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Based on:<br>Pulp sensibility tests<br>Periapical status<br>Radiographs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #000; color: yellow; border: 2px solid red; text-align: center;">Based on presence/absence of a periapical radiolucency</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #0055ff; color: white; text-align: center;">i.e. diagnosing apical periodontitis</td>
</tr>
</table>
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 33
#### Abbott & Yu vs. AAE Terminology Comparison
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Abbott & Yu -v- AAE Comparison</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>~~Clinically normal pulp~~</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Reversible pulpitis &rarr;</td>
<td>Acute - Chronic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Irreversible pulpitis &rarr;</td>
<td>~~Acute - Chronic~~ Symptomatic - Asymptomatic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp necrobiosis</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp necrosis &rarr;</td>
<td>Infected (???) - No sign of Infection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulpless and infected root canal system</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Previous Endodontic Treatment &rarr;</td>
<td>Infected RCS (???) - No signs of infection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp atrophy</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp canal calcification</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pulp hyperplasia</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Internal resorption &rarr;</td>
<td>Surface - Inflammatory - Replacement</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #000; color: yellow;">The AAE Classification has a <u>SHORTFALL</u> of 10 conditions that have been shown to occur - plus <u>INAPPROPRIATE</u> terminology !!!</td>
</tr>
</table>
#### Diagnostic Criteria for Pulp and Canal Status
<table>
<tr>
<th colspan="2">Diagnosis of Pulp/Canal Status</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Pulpitis</b></td>
<td><b>Reversible or Irreversible</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Based on:<br>- Severity of symptoms<br>- Duration of symptoms</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="text-align: center;">Mainly with temperature changes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Infected Canal</b></td>
<td><b>Necrosis, Pulpless or RFd</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Based on:<br>- Pulp sensibility tests<br>- Periapical status<br>- Radiographs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #000; color: yellow; border: 2px solid red; text-align: center;">Based on presence/absence of a periapical radiolucency</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #0055ff; color: white; text-align: center;">i.e. diagnosing apical periodontitis</td>
</tr>
</table>
![]()
A comparative diagram titled 'Abbott & Yu -v- AAE' listing pulp conditions like 'Reversible pulpitis' and 'Irreversible pulpitis' alongside their sub-classifications such as 'Acute', 'Chronic', 'Symptomatic', and 'Asymptomatic'. It features crossed-out terms and question marks to indicate discrepancies, concluding with a highlighted note about a 'SHORTFALL of 10 conditions' in the AAE Classification.
![]()
A flowchart-style diagram titled 'Diagnosis of Pulp/Canal Status' that categorizes conditions into 'Pulpitis' (Reversible or Irreversible) and 'Infected Canal' (Necrosis, Pulpless, or RFd). It uses arrows and brackets to detail diagnostic criteria, such as 'Severity of symptoms' for pulpitis and 'Pulp sensibility tests' or 'Radiographs' for infected canals, emphasizing the role of temperature changes and periapical radiolucency.
Pulp and Root Canal Conditions
Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"><b>Typical Symptoms</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Symptoms (Above)</th>
<th>Condition</th>
<th>Symptoms (Below)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><b>Clinically Normal Pulp</b></td>
<td><b>No symptoms or signs</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Chronic Reversible Pulpitis</td>
<td><b>Few &/or occasional symptoms - short, sharp pain to heat, cold</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Regular short, sharp pain with heat, cold</b></td>
<td><b>Acute Reversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis</td>
<td><b>Occasional sharp & lingering pain with heat, cold</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Severe sharp & lingering pain with heat, cold; Spontaneous; Worse lying down; Wakes patient</b></td>
<td><b>Acute Irreversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td><b>May or may not have acute apical periodontitis</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Mixed symptoms or signs of pulpitis & necrosis</b></td>
<td><b>Pulp Necrobiosis</b></td>
<td><b>Eventually acute apical periodontitis</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><b>Pulp Necrosis with Infection</b></td>
<td><b>No pulp symptoms</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><b>Pulpless Infected RCS</b></td>
<td><b>No pulp symptoms</b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
2nd Year DMD - 2023
Page 34
#### Typical Symptoms and Diagnostic Indicators
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th colspan="3"><b>Typical Symptoms</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Symptoms (Above)</th>
<th>Condition</th>
<th>Symptoms (Below)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><b>Clinically Normal Pulp</b></td>
<td><b>No symptoms or signs</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Chronic Reversible Pulpitis</td>
<td><b>Few &/or occasional symptoms - short, sharp pain to heat, cold</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Regular short, sharp pain with heat, cold</b></td>
<td><b>Acute Reversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Chronic Irreversible Pulpitis</td>
<td><b>Occasional sharp & lingering pain with heat, cold</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Severe sharp & lingering pain with heat, cold; Spontaneous; Worse lying down; Wakes patient</b></td>
<td><b>Acute Irreversible Pulpitis</b></td>
<td><b>May or may not have acute apical periodontitis</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>Mixed symptoms or signs of pulpitis & necrosis</b></td>
<td><b>Pulp Necrobiosis</b></td>
<td><b>Eventually acute apical periodontitis</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><b>Pulp Necrosis with Infection</b></td>
<td><b>No pulp symptoms</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><b>Pulpless Infected RCS</b></td>
<td><b>No pulp symptoms</b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
![]()
A flowchart diagram titled 'Typical Symptoms' illustrating the progression of pulp and root canal conditions. It maps clinical signs such as 'Regular short, sharp pain with heat, cold' to conditions like 'Acute Reversible Pulpitis' and 'Acute Irreversible Pulpitis', eventually leading to necrosis and infection states like 'Pulpless Infected RCS'.
![]()
A composite figure titled 'Acute Irreversible Pulpitis' displaying a dental radiograph and histological slides of tooth roots. The image highlights 'Intense inflammation' and 'Pulp breakdown' in the Mesial Root, contrasting it with the Distal Root which shows 'Less inflammation' and 'Normal apical pulp'.
**Pulp and Root Canal Conditions** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO**
<br>
**Diagnosis of Pulp/Canal Status**
<table>
<tr>
<th>Symptoms</th>
<th><b>Reversible<br>Pulpitis</b></th>
<th><b>Irreversible<br>Pulpitis</b></th>
<th><b>Infected RCS +<br>Chr. Ap. Periodontitis</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nature</td>
<td><b>Sharp, mild &rarr; mod.</b></td>
<td><b>Sharp & aching</b></td>
<td><b>Dull ache, throb</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thermal sensitivity</td>
<td><b>Extreme temp's</b></td>
<td><b>Mild changes</b></td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration</td>
<td><b>Short</b><br>(<b>sec's &rarr; min's</b>)</td>
<td><b>Lingers</b><br>(<b>? > 5-10 min's</b>)</td>
<td><b>On + off &rarr;</b><br><b>Continuous</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Biting pain</td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Percussion</td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spontaneous</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Wakes at night</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Worse lying down</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Radiographic changes</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>History previous problems</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
</table>
<br>
**Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions**
Ingle's Endodontics 7
**Abbott, PV.**
2019: 215 – 266.
Australian Dental Journal
Endodontics Supplement
**Abbott & Yu**
**ADJ 2007**
<table>
<tr>
<td><b>NO SIGNS OF DISEASE:</b></td>
<td>• CLINICALLY NORMAL PULP (Based on history, clinical examination, tests, radiographs, etc)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>PULPITIS:</b></td>
<td>• REVERSIBLE PULPITIS – Acute<br> - Chronic<br>• IRREVERSIBLE PULPITIS – Acute<br> - Chronic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>PULP NECROSIS:</b></td>
<td>• PULP NECROBOSIS (Part of pulp is necrotic & infected; the rest is irreversibly inflamed)<br>• PULP NECROSIS with NO signs of Infection<br>• NECROTIC AND INFECTED PULP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>PULPLESS TEETH:</b></td>
<td>• PULPLESS AND INFECTED ROOT CANAL SYSTEM<br>• TEETH WITH PREVIOUS ROOT CANAL TREATMENT<br> - Root-filled with NO signs of infection<br> - Root-filled and infected<br> - Incomplete endodontic treatment* (e.g. treatment started elsewhere)<br> * NOTE: Also specify whether the root canal system is infected or not<br> - Technical standard (Based on the radiographic appearance)<br> - Adequate<br> - Inadequate<br> - Other problems - specify the problem: e.g. Perforation, Untreated canal(s), Fractured instrument, Silver point, etc.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><b>DEGENERATIVE CHANGES:</b></td>
<td>• PULP CANAL CALCIFICATION** – Partial<br> - "Complete" (Based on radiographic appearance)<br> ** NOTE: Also specify the diagnosis/condition of the pulp or root canal system<br>• PULP HYPERPLASIA (NOTE: a form of pulpitis; specify the pulp status also)<br>• INTERNAL RESORPTION - Internal SURFACE Resorption<br> - Internal INFLAMMATORY Resorption<br> - Internal REPLACEMENT Resorption</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br>
**2nd Year DMD - 2023** &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; **Page 35**
#### Differential Diagnosis of Pulp/Canal Status
<table>
<tr>
<th>Symptoms</th>
<th><b>Reversible Pulpitis</b></th>
<th><b>Irreversible Pulpitis</b></th>
<th><b>Infected RCS + Chr. Ap. Periodontitis</b></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nature</td>
<td><b>Sharp, mild &rarr; mod.</b></td>
<td><b>Sharp & aching</b></td>
<td><b>Dull ache, throb</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Thermal sensitivity</td>
<td><b>Extreme temp's</b></td>
<td><b>Mild changes</b></td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Duration</td>
<td><b>Short</b> (<b>sec's &rarr; min's</b>)</td>
<td><b>Lingers</b> (<b>? > 5-10 min's</b>)</td>
<td><b>On + off &rarr; Continuous</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Biting pain</td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Percussion</td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Spontaneous</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Wakes at night</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Worse lying down</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Radiographic changes</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>History previous problems</td>
<td><b>-</b></td>
<td><b>&plusmn;</b></td>
<td><b>+</b></td>
</tr>
</table>
#### Clinical Classification Summary (Abbott & Yu ADJ 2007)
- **NO SIGNS OF DISEASE:**
- CLINICALLY NORMAL PULP (Based on history, clinical examination, tests, radiographs, etc)
- **PULPITIS:**
- REVERSIBLE PULPITIS – Acute / Chronic
- IRREVERSIBLE PULPITIS – Acute / Chronic
- **PULP NECROSIS:**
- PULP NECROBIOSIS (Part of pulp is necrotic & infected; the rest is irreversibly inflamed)
- PULP NECROSIS with NO signs of Infection
- NECROTIC AND INFECTED PULP
- **PULPLESS TEETH:**
- PULPLESS AND INFECTED ROOT CANAL SYSTEM
- TEETH WITH PREVIOUS ROOT CANAL TREATMENT
- Root-filled with NO signs of infection
- Root-filled and infected
- Incomplete endodontic treatment (Specify if RCS is infected)
- Technical standard: Adequate / Inadequate
- Other problems: Perforation, Untreated canal(s), Fractured instrument, Silver point, etc.
- **DEGENERATIVE CHANGES:**
- PULP CANAL CALCIFICATION (Partial / "Complete")
- PULP HYPERPLASIA (A form of pulpitis)
- INTERNAL RESORPTION (Surface / Inflammatory / Replacement)
![]()
A table titled 'Diagnosis of Pulp/Canal Status' comparing symptoms such as nature, thermal sensitivity, and duration for Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Infected RCS with Chronic Apical Periodontitis.
![]()
A classification table titled 'Clinical Classification of Pulp & Root Canal Conditions' listing categories like No Signs of Disease, Pulpitis, Pulp Necrosis, Pulpless Teeth, and Degenerative Changes.
[^1]: Original PDF page 1: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=1|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.1]]
[^2]: Original PDF page 2: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=2|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.2]]
[^3]: Original PDF page 3: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=3|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.3]]
[^4]: Original PDF page 4: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=4|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.4]]
[^5]: Original PDF page 5: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=5|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.5]]
[^6]: Original PDF page 6: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=6|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.6]]
[^7]: Original PDF page 7: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=7|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.7]]
[^8]: Original PDF page 8: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=8|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.8]]
[^9]: Original PDF page 9: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=9|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.9]]
[^10]: Original PDF page 10: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=10|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.10]]
[^11]: Original PDF page 11: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=11|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.11]]
[^12]: Original PDF page 12: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=12|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.12]]
[^13]: Original PDF page 13: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=13|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.13]]
[^14]: Original PDF page 14: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=14|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.14]]
[^15]: Original PDF page 15: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=15|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.15]]
[^16]: Original PDF page 16: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=16|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.16]]
[^17]: Original PDF page 17: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=17|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.17]]
[^18]: Original PDF page 18: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=18|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.18]]
[^19]: Original PDF page 19: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=19|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.19]]
[^20]: Original PDF page 20: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=20|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.20]]
[^21]: Original PDF page 21: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=21|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.21]]
[^22]: Original PDF page 22: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=22|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.22]]
[^23]: Original PDF page 23: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=23|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.23]]
[^24]: Original PDF page 24: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=24|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.24]]
[^25]: Original PDF page 25: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=25|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.25]]
[^26]: Original PDF page 26: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=26|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.26]]
[^27]: Original PDF page 27: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=27|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.27]]
[^28]: Original PDF page 28: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=28|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.28]]
[^29]: Original PDF page 29: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=29|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.29]]
[^30]: Original PDF page 30: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=30|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.30]]
[^31]: Original PDF page 31: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=31|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.31]]
[^32]: Original PDF page 32: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=32|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.32]]
[^33]: Original PDF page 33: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=33|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.33]]
[^34]: Original PDF page 34: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=34|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.34]]
[^35]: Original PDF page 35: [[L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023.pdf#page=35|L1.Pulp Root Canal and Peri-radicular Conditions - Part 1 - DMD2 - Handout - 2023, p.35]]