**Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** --- **Anti-Bacterial Strategies** **- Part 2** **Winthrop Prof. Paul V. Abbott** *AO* **BDSc, MDS, DDSc, FRACDS(Endo), FPFA, FADI, FICD, FACD, FIADT** Specialist Endodontist **Winthrop Professor of Clinical Dentistry** UWA Dental School --- **Endodontic Medicaments** --- **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 1**  #### Presenter Information **Winthrop Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** BDSc, MDS, DDSc, FRACDS(Endo), FPFA, FADI, FICD, FACD, FIADT Specialist Endodontist Winthrop Professor of Clinical Dentistry UWA Dental School #### Course Details - **Subject:** Anti-Bacterial Strategies - Part 2 - **Topic:** Endodontic Medicaments - **Academic Year:** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 A photograph displaying various endodontic medicaments, including tubes labeled 'LEDERMIX', 'PULPDENT', and 'CALASEPT', along with a syringe and a foil packet, situated on a blue background under the slide title 'Endodontic Medicaments'. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Reduce endodontic microbial flora by:** 1. Identify and remove the cause 2. Aseptic procedures 3. Instrumentation 4. Irrigants 5. Medicaments 6. Interim and temporary restorations 7. Root canal filling 8. Coronal restoration **Irrigants / Bacteria-Free Canals** <table> <tr> <th><b>Irrigant</b></th> <th><b>% canals free of bacteria after one appointment</b></th> </tr> <tr> <td>Nil</td> <td>0</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Saline</td> <td>20</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NaOCl</td> <td>50</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NaOCl + EDTA</td> <td>70</td> </tr> </table> **Based on data from Byström & Sundqvist 1981, 1985 and from Sjögren & Sundqvist 1987** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 2  #### Strategies to Reduce Endodontic Microbial Flora 1. Identify and remove the cause 2. Aseptic procedures 3. Instrumentation 4. Irrigants 5. Medicaments 6. Interim and temporary restorations 7. Root canal filling 8. Coronal restoration #### Effectiveness of Irrigants in Achieving Bacteria-Free Canals Based on data from Byström & Sundqvist (1981, 1985) and Sjögren & Sundqvist (1987), the percentage of canals free of bacteria after one appointment varies by irrigant used: - **Nil:** 0% - **Saline:** 20% - **Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl):** 50% - **NaOCl + EDTA:** 70% A table titled 'Irrigants / Bacteria-Free Canals' that displays the percentage of canals free of bacteria after one appointment using different irrigants such as Nil (0%), Saline (20%), NaOCl (50%), and NaOCl + EDTA (70%). Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO Aims of Endodontic Treatment * To remove all micro-organisms from the root canal system * To remove all canal contents (organic or otherwise) that may lead to growth of micro-organisms or the breakdown of toxic products and their release into the periapical tissues * To prepare the canal for its disinfection and to develop a shape that permits a simple and effective root canal filling to be placed * To prevent micro-organisms from entering the tooth again and re-establishing infection in the root canal system as this causes apical periodontitis Aims of Endodontic Treatment * To remove all **micro-organisms** from the root canal system * To remove all canal contents (organic or otherwise) that may lead to growth of **micro-organisms** or the breakdown of toxic products and their release into the periapical tissues * To prepare the canal for its **disinfection** and to develop a shape that permits a simple and effective root canal filling to be placed * To prevent **micro-organisms** from entering the tooth again and re-establishing infection in the root canal system as this causes apical periodontitis 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 3 The primary objectives of endodontic treatment include: - **Removal of Micro-organisms:** To eliminate all micro-organisms from the root canal system. - **Debridement:** To remove all canal contents (organic or otherwise) that may lead to the growth of micro-organisms or the breakdown of toxic products and their subsequent release into the periapical tissues. - **Canal Preparation:** To prepare the canal for disinfection and develop a shape that permits a simple and effective root canal filling to be placed. - **Prevention of Re-infection:** To prevent micro-organisms from re-entering the tooth and re-establishing infection in the root canal system, which causes apical periodontitis. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis** **Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Bujis JF, van Winkelhoff AJ.** J Endod 2001; 27: 76-81 **Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis** **Peters et al** JoE 2001 <table> <tr> <td><b>A</b></td> <td><b>81% had bacteria</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>B</b></td> <td><b>60% had bacteria</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>C</b></td> <td><b>62% had bacteria</b></td> </tr> </table> <table> <tr> <td colspan="3">♦ 40% of samples with bacteria had >50,000 CFU’s/mg dentine</td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>A</b> - 41%</td> <td><b>B</b> - 41%</td> <td><b>C</b> - 38.5%</td> </tr> </table> 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 4  #### Research Findings: Peters et al. (2001) Study: *Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis* (J Endod 2001; 27: 76-81). **Presence of Bacteria by Sample Group:** - **Group A:** 81% had bacteria - **Group B:** 60% had bacteria - **Group C:** 62% had bacteria **Bacterial Load:** - 40% of samples containing bacteria had >50,000 Colony Forming Units (CFU’s) per mg of dentine. - Distribution of high bacterial loads across groups: - Group A: 41% - Group B: 41% - Group C: 38.5% A diagram illustrating viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis based on Peters et al. (2001). It shows a cross-section of a tooth root with zones A, B, and C, indicating that 81%, 60%, and 62% of samples had bacteria in those respective zones. Additional data notes that 40% of samples with bacteria contained >50,000 CFU's/mg dentine. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study** **Vera J, Siqueira JF, Ricucci D, Logbin S, Fernández N, Flores B, Cruz AG.** *J Endod 2012; 38: 1040 - 1052* **Single- versus two-visit treatment - Vera et al JoE 2012** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 5  #### Histobacteriologic Study: Vera et al. (2012) Study: *One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study* (J Endod 2012; 38: 1040 - 1052). This research compares the efficacy of single-visit versus two-visit endodontic protocols in managing apical periodontitis. A composite figure from a histobacteriologic study (Vera et al., 2012) comparing single- versus two-visit endodontic treatment. It displays four histological cross-sections of teeth (micrographs), labeled F, H, and J, with red arrows indicating specific areas within the root canals. # Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO *** **Byström & Sundqvist 1981, 1985** **Sjögren & Sundqvist 1987** - **OBSERVED:** - **Bacterial numbers increased in the empty canals between appointments** - **CONCLUDED:** - **An inter-appointment antibacterial dressing is necessary to predictably achieve canals that are free of bacteria** *** **Dentinal Tubules** <img src="dentinal_tubules_images" alt="Micrographs of dentinal tubules showing bacterial colonies" /> **Walton 1996** *** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 6  #### Necessity of Inter-appointment Dressings **Observations (Byström & Sundqvist 1981, 1985; Sjögren & Sundqvist 1987):** - Bacterial numbers were observed to increase in empty canals between appointments. **Conclusion:** - An inter-appointment antibacterial dressing is necessary to predictably achieve canals that are free of bacteria. #### Bacterial Colonization of Dentinal Tubules Research by Walton (1996) utilizes micrographs to demonstrate the presence of bacterial colonies within the dentinal tubules. Two electron micrographs showing dentinal tubules, with the left image displaying a cross-section containing bacterial colonies and the right image showing a surface view with bacteria, cited from Walton 1996. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** *** **Fins, Transverse Anastomoses, Lateral Canals, Accessory Canals, etc** *** **Eight _Essential_ Steps to Reduce the Endodontic Microbial Flora:** 1. Identify and remove the cause 2. Aseptic procedures 3. Mechanical instrumentation 4. Anti-bacterial irrigants 5. **Intracanal medicaments** 6. Interim & temporary restorations 7. Root canal filling 8. Coronal restoration *** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 7   #### Anatomical Challenges to Disinfection Microbial flora can persist in complex anatomical features such as: - Fins - Transverse anastomoses - Lateral canals - Accessory canals #### Eight Essential Steps to Reduce Microbial Flora 1. Identify and remove the cause 2. Aseptic procedures 3. Mechanical instrumentation 4. Anti-bacterial irrigants 5. **Intracanal medicaments** 6. Interim & temporary restorations 7. Root canal filling 8. Coronal restoration A presentation slide with a dark blue background titled 'Fins, Transverse Anastomoses, Lateral Canals, Accessory Canals, etc', featuring two images of tooth anatomy and internal structures. A presentation slide with a dark blue background titled 'Eight Essential Steps to Reduce the Endodontic Microbial Flora', listing eight procedural steps for endodontic treatment. Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Why Use Medicaments ?** * **Anti-bacterial action** * **Residual bacteria in canals, tubules, fins, etc** * **Contaminants between visits** * **Periapical region** * **Periodontal tissues** * **Reduce periapical inflammation** * **Prevent or reduce pain** * **Stimulate periapical repair** * **Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption** **Microbiological analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment** **Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U.** **OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 1998; 85; 86-93** 2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023 Page 8 #### Clinical Rationale Intracanal medicaments are utilized for several critical reasons: - **Anti-bacterial Action:** Targeting residual bacteria in canals, tubules, and fins; preventing contaminants between visits; and addressing bacteria in the periapical and periodontal tissues. - **Inflammation Control:** To reduce periapical inflammation. - **Pain Management:** To prevent or reduce post-operative pain. - **Tissue Repair:** To stimulate periapical repair. - **Resorption Inhibition:** To prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption. #### Retreatment Outcomes Reference: *Microbiological analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment* (Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U. OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 1998; 85; 86-93). **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Results - Infection / RCF** * 12% had microbes present at time of root filling: * **Only 33% of these cases healed** * 88% no microbes present at time of root filling: * **80% of these cases healed** * **This 47% difference was statistically significant** **Sundqvist et al 1998** **Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis** Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. **Int Endo J 1997; 30: 297-306** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 9 #### Retreatment Success Rates (Sundqvist et al. 1998) - **Microbes present at time of root filling:** 12% of cases. - **Healing rate:** 33% - **No microbes present at time of root filling:** 88% of cases. - **Healing rate:** 80% - **Statistical Significance:** The 47% difference in healing outcomes was statistically significant. #### Impact of Infection on Outcome (Sjögren et al. 1997) Study: *Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis* (Int Endo J 1997; 30: 297-306). **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Results** - All teeth were initially infected - **22 (40%) still had bacteria after instrumentation** - Complete healing after 5 years - **94% of cases with negative culture at RCF** - **68% of cases with positive culture at RCF** - **26% difference** - **- statistically significant** - **Sjögren et al 1997** **Discussion** - Emphasises the need to eliminate bacteria from canals prior to placing the RCF - This can **NOT** be **RELIABLY** achieved with a one-visit treatment procedure - **Demonstrates - it is NOT possible to remove ALL organisms from root canals without the support of inter-appointment anti-microbial dressings** - **Sjögren et al 1997** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 10   #### Clinical Results (Sjögren et al. 1997) - **Initial Status:** All teeth were initially infected. - **Post-Instrumentation:** 22 teeth (40%) still harbored bacteria after instrumentation. - **Healing Outcomes (5-year follow-up):** - 94% healing in cases with a negative culture at the time of root canal filling (RCF). - 68% healing in cases with a positive culture at RCF. - The 26% difference is statistically significant. #### Clinical Implications and Discussion - **Elimination of Bacteria:** The data emphasizes the absolute need to eliminate bacteria from canals prior to placing the RCF. - **Single-Visit Limitations:** Reliable bacterial elimination can **NOT** be achieved with a one-visit treatment procedure. - **Role of Medicaments:** It is not possible to remove all organisms from root canals without the support of inter-appointment anti-microbial dressings. A results summary slide presenting statistical data from a study by Sjögren et al 1997, highlighting that 22 (40%) of teeth still had bacteria after instrumentation and a 26% statistically significant difference in healing rates (94% vs 68%) based on bacterial culture status at RCF. A discussion summary slide emphasizing the necessity of eliminating bacteria from canals prior to placing RCF and stating that one-visit treatment cannot reliably achieve this, necessitating inter-appointment anti-microbial dressings. The user wants me to extract text from the provided image, which appears to be a slide or page from a presentation. I need to use the PDF text provided in the prompt as a reference to correct any OCR errors, but prioritize the visual text. The formatting requirements are specific: - Match text formatting (bold for colors). - Format tables as HTML (if applicable). - Format flowcharts as tables (if applicable). - If it's just an image with sparse text, describe it and wrap in `<img>`. - All other formatting in Markdown. - Do not add anything to the text itself. **Analyzing the Image:** The image contains two main sections (slides) on a white background. **Top Section:** - Header: "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" and "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" - Slide Header (Blue box): "Microbial status of lower molars after “one-visit” endodontic treatment" - Citation: "Nair et al OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 2005" (Note: The OCR says "OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo", which looks like journal abbreviations). - Title: "Results" (Yellow/Orange text -> Bold). - Bullet points: - "14 of the 16 teeth contained microbes - 88%" (White text). - Sub-bullet: "Cells were dividing indicating viability" (Green text -> Bold). Wait, looking closely at the image, the text "Cells..." is partially obscured by a blue speech bubble. The PDF text says "Cells were dividing indicating viability". The image shows green text "Cells ... ating viability". The blue bubble says "Inaccessible to Endodontic files". - "MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes - 50%" (White/Pinkish text). The PDF says "MLi canal (NiTi)". The image looks like "MLi ca... robes". The blue bubble covers part of it. - "MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes - 50%" (White/Pinkish text). - "10 had microbes in the isthmus - 63%" (White text). - "5 had microbes in lateral canals - 31%" (White text). The blue oval covers part of "lateral". - Annotations: There are red circles and a blue speech bubble added to the image. - Blue bubble: "Inaccessible to Endodontic files" (White text inside blue bubble with red border). - Blue oval: Covers "lateral canals". **Bottom Section:** - Slide Title: "Why Use Medicaments ?" (Yellow text -> Bold). - Bullet points: - "Anti-bacterial action" (White/Grey text). - Sub-bullets (small squares): - "Residual bacteria in canals, tubules, fins, etc" - "Contaminants between visits" - "Periapical region" - "Periodontal tissues" - "Reduce periapical inflammation" - "Prevent or reduce pain" (Green text -> Bold). - "Stimulate periapical repair" - "Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption" **Footer:** - "2nd Year DMD - 2023" - "Page 11" **Refining the Extraction:** I will structure the output to reflect the two distinct blocks. **Block 1: Top Slide** Header: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** | W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO Slide Content: **Microbial status of lower molars after “one-visit” endodontic treatment** Nair et al OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 2005 **Results** - 14 of the 16 teeth contained microbes - 88% - **Cells were dividing indicating viability** (Green text) - MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes - 50% - MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes - 50% - 10 had microbes in the isthmus - 63% - 5 had microbes in lateral canals - 31% *Annotations/Callouts:* - Inaccessible to Endodontic files (Blue bubble) - (Red circle around "lateral canals") **Block 2: Bottom Slide** **Why Use Medicaments ?** - **Anti-bacterial action** - Residual bacteria in canals, tubules, fins, etc - Contaminants between visits - Periapical region - Periodontal tissues - **Reduce periapical inflammation** - **Prevent or reduce pain** (Green text) - **Stimulate periapical repair** - **Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption** Wait, looking at the colors in the bottom slide: - "Anti-bacterial action" is greyish. - "Reduce periapical inflammation" is greyish. - "Prevent or reduce pain" is bright green. - "Stimulate periapical repair" is greyish. - "Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption" is greyish. The PDF text provided has all white/grey. The image shows specific colors. I should probably bold the main headings or color text if possible, but standard markdown doesn't support color easily unless I use HTML. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". So: - "Results" -> Bold (Yellow) - "Cells were dividing indicating viability" -> Bold (Green) - "Why Use Medicaments ?" -> Bold (Yellow) - "Prevent or reduce pain" -> Bold (Green) Let's look at the top slide text again. "MLi canal (hand)" in the image looks like "MLi ca... robes". The PDF says "MLi canal (NiTi)". The image actually looks like "MLi ca...". Wait, let's look really closely at crop 2. It says "MLi ca...". The PDF says "MLi canal (NiTi)". The next line says "MB canal (hand)". It is highly likely the first line is "MLi canal (NiTi)" and the second is "MB canal (hand)". The text is obscured. I will use the PDF text where it makes sense but describe the visual. Actually, the prompt says "Prioritize image text but use PDF text for context to enhance the ocr". So I will use the PDF text "MLi canal (NiTi)" if the image is too cut off, but looking at the image, it looks like "MLi canal (NiTi): 8 ha... robes". Wait, the PDF says "MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes". The image has a blue bubble over it. The text is white. The text "MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes" is clear. Let's re-evaluate the colors for bolding. Top slide: - "Results" is yellow/orange. -> **Results** - "Cells were dividing..." is green. -> **Cells were dividing indicating viability** (Though the text is green in the image). - "MLi canal..." is white/pinkish. - "MB canal..." is white/pinkish. - "10 had..." is white. - "5 had..." is white. - "Microbial status..." is yellow. -> **Microbial status of lower molars after “one-visit” endodontic treatment** Bottom slide: - "Why Use Medicaments ?" is yellow. -> **Why Use Medicaments ?** - "Anti-bacterial action" is grey/white. - "Residual bacteria..." is grey/white. - "Prevent or reduce pain" is green. -> **Prevent or reduce pain** The prompt says: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This implies main headings vs body text. "Results" is a heading. "Microbial status..." is a heading. "Why Use Medicaments ?" is a heading. "Cells were dividing..." is green, distinct from the rest. "Prevent or reduce pain" is green. I will format the main headers and the green text as bold. Let's assemble the text. **Header:** **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Slide 1:** **Microbial status of lower molars after “one-visit” endodontic treatment** Nair et al OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 2005 **Results** - 14 of the 16 teeth contained microbes - 88% - **Cells were dividing indicating viability** - MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes - 50% - MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes - 50% - 10 had microbes in the isthmus - 63% - 5 had microbes in lateral canals - 31% *Note: There is a blue speech bubble pointing to the "MLi canal" and "MB canal" area saying "Inaccessible to Endodontic files". There is a red oval around "lateral canals".* **Slide 2:** **Why Use Medicaments ?** - **Anti-bacterial action** - Residual bacteria in canals, tubules, fins, etc - Contaminants between visits - Periapical region - Periodontal tissues - Reduce periapical inflammation - **Prevent or reduce pain** - Stimulate periapical repair - Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption Wait, looking at the bottom slide, "Anti-bacterial action" is grey, "Reduce periapical inflammation" is grey. "Prevent or reduce pain" is green. "Stimulate periapical repair" is grey. "Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption" is grey. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". So "Results" (Yellow) -> Bold. "Microbial status..." (Yellow) -> Bold. "Why Use Medicaments ?" (Yellow) -> Bold. "Cells were dividing..." (Green) -> Bold. "Prevent or reduce pain" (Green) -> Bold. Let's check the top slide text again. "14 of the 16 teeth..." is white. "MLi canal..." is white/pinkish. "MB canal..." is white/pinkish. "10 had..." is white. "5 had..." is white. Okay, I will proceed with this structure. I will ignore the red circles/bubbles as they are annotations not part of the original slide content, unless I mention them as description. The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image". It doesn't explicitly say "ignore annotations". But usually, annotations like red circles added in PowerPoint are not part of the "slide content" in a transcription sense, but they contain text ("Inaccessible to Endodontic files"). I should include that text. The text "Inaccessible to Endodontic files" is white text inside a blue box. The text "lateral canals" is circled but it's part of the slide text. So, final plan: 1. Top header. 2. Slide 1 content including the callout box text. 3. Slide 2 content. 4. Footer. One detail: "Nair et al OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 2005". The OCR text says "OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo". This is likely "Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod". I will stick to the visual text "OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo" as per "Prioritize image text". One detail: "MLi canal (NiTi)". The image shows "MLi ca...". The PDF says "MLi canal (NiTi)". I will use the PDF text because the image is obscured by the blue box. Actually, looking really closely at crop 2, it says "MLi ca...". The blue box covers "nel (NiTi): 8 ha...". The PDF text fills this in perfectly. One detail: "MB canal (hand): 8 ha...". The PDF says "8 had microbes". The image shows "8 ha...". I will use "8 had microbes". One detail: "10 had microbes in the isthmus". The image shows "10 had microbes in the isthmus". The blue oval covers "in the". Wait, no. The blue oval covers "lateral canals" in the last line. In the "isthmus" line, the text is mostly visible. "10 had microbes in the isthmus - 63%". The blue oval is below it. The blue bubble text: "Inaccessible to Endodontic files". Let's write it out. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Microbial status of lower molars after “one-visit” endodontic treatment** Nair et al OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 2005 **Results** - 14 of the 16 teeth contained microbes - 88% - **Cells were dividing indicating viability** - MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes - 50% - MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes - 50% - 10 had microbes in the isthmus - 63% - 5 had microbes in lateral canals - 31% (Blue callout box): Inaccessible to Endodontic files **Why Use Medicaments ?** - **Anti-bacterial action** - Residual bacteria in canals, tubules, fins, etc - Contaminants between visits - Periapical region - Periodontal tissues - Reduce periapical inflammation - **Prevent or reduce pain** - Stimulate periapical repair - Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 11 Wait, looking at the bottom slide, "Anti-bacterial action" is grey. "Reduce periapical inflammation" is grey. "Prevent or reduce pain" is green. "Stimulate periapical repair" is grey. "Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption" is grey. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". In the top slide, "Results" is yellow. "Microbial status..." is yellow. In the bottom slide, "Why Use Medicaments ?" is yellow. "Cells were dividing..." is green. "Prevent or reduce pain" is green. So I will bold: - Results - Microbial status... - Cells were dividing... - Why Use Medicaments ? - Anti-bacterial action (It looks slightly lighter/greyer than the white text, but the PDF has it as a main bullet. Actually, looking at the image, "Anti-bacterial action" is a main bullet point, same level as "Reduce periapical inflammation". Wait. Let's look at the bullets. Top slide: Pink diamonds. Bottom slide: - Pink diamond: "Anti-bacterial action" - Grey square: "Residual bacteria..." - Pink diamond: "Reduce periapical inflammation" - Pink diamond: "Prevent or reduce pain" (Green text) - Pink diamond: "Stimulate periapical repair" - Pink diamond: "Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption" Wait, let's look at the bullets in the bottom slide again. - Diamond (pink/grey): Anti-bacterial action - Square: Residual bacteria... - Square: Contaminants... - Square: Periapical region - Square: Periodontal tissues - Diamond: Reduce periapical inflammation - Diamond (pink): Prevent or reduce pain - Diamond: Stimulate periapical repair - Diamond: Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption Actually, "Anti-bacterial action" seems to have sub-bullets (squares). "Reduce periapical inflammation" is a main bullet. "Prevent or reduce pain" is a main bullet (and green). "Stimulate periapical repair" is a main bullet. "Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption" is a main bullet. The text "Anti-bacterial action" is grey. The text "Reduce periapical inflammation" is grey. The text "Prevent or reduce pain" is green. The text "Stimulate periapical repair" is grey. The text "Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption" is grey. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". Yellow is different from white/grey. Green is different from white/grey. So: **Results** (Yellow) **Microbial status...** (Yellow) **Cells were dividing...** (Green) **Why Use Medicaments ?** (Yellow) **Prevent or reduce pain** (Green) What about "Anti-bacterial action"? It's grey. The sub-bullets are grey. What about "MLi canal"? It's white/pink. What about "MB canal"? It's white/pink. I will stick to the most obvious color changes for bolding. One final check on the PDF text provided: "MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes - 50%" "MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes - 50%" The image text for MB canal is "MB canal (hand): 8 ha...". The image text for MLi canal is "MLi ca...". I will use the corrected text. The text "Inaccessible to Endodontic files" is inside a blue box with a red border. The text "lateral canals" is circled in red (and blue oval). I will include the text "Inaccessible to Endodontic files" as it is text in the image. Final Structure: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Microbial status of lower molars after “one-visit” endodontic treatment** Nair et al OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 2005 **Results** - 14 of the 16 teeth contained microbes - 88% - **Cells were dividing indicating viability** - MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes - 50% - MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes - 50% - 10 had microbes in the isthmus - 63% - 5 had microbes in lateral canals - 31% *(Blue callout box)*: Inaccessible to Endodontic files **Why Use Medicaments ?** - **Anti-bacterial action** (Wait, is it bold? It's a main header for that section. But the color is grey. I'll leave it unbolded unless I interpret "different colour" as "heading colour". The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour". White/Grey is standard. Yellow and Green are different. So I won't bold "Anti-bacterial action" based on color, but it acts as a header. I'll look at the top slide. "Results" is a header and is yellow. "Microbial status" is a header and is yellow. "Why Use Medicaments" is a header and is yellow. So I will bold headers that are yellow. "Anti-bacterial action" is NOT yellow. It is grey. So I will not bold it based on color. However, looking at the layout, "Anti-bacterial action" is a main bullet. I will follow the color rule strictly. Green text: - Cells were dividing indicating viability - Prevent or reduce pain Yellow text: - Microbial status... - Results - Why Use Medicaments ? Okay, ready to write. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Microbial status of lower molars after “one-visit” endodontic treatment** Nair et al OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 2005 **Results** - 14 of the 16 teeth contained microbes - 88% - **Cells were dividing indicating viability** - MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes - 50% - MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes - 50% - 10 had microbes in the isthmus - 63% - 5 had microbes in lateral canals - 31% *(Blue callout)*: Inaccessible to Endodontic files **Why Use Medicaments ?** - Anti-bacterial action - Residual bacteria in canals, tubules, fins, etc - Contaminants between visits - Periapical region - Periodontal tissues - Reduce periapical inflammation - **Prevent or reduce pain** - Stimulate periapical repair - Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 11 #### Microbial Status of Lower Molars After "One-Visit" Endodontic Treatment Nair et al OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo 2005 #### Results - 14 of the 16 teeth contained microbes - 88% - **Cells were dividing indicating viability** - MLi canal (NiTi): 8 had microbes - 50% - MB canal (hand): 8 had microbes - 50% - 10 had microbes in the isthmus - 63% - 5 had microbes in lateral canals - 31% *Note: Microbes in these areas are often inaccessible to endodontic files.* #### Rationale for Using Medicaments - Anti-bacterial action - Residual bacteria in canals, tubules, fins, etc. - Contaminants between visits - Periapical region - Periodontal tissues - Reduce periapical inflammation - **Prevent or reduce pain** - Stimulate periapical repair - Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **The relationship of intracanal medicaments to postoperative pain in endodontics** *Int Endod J 2003; 36: 868-875* E. H. Ehrmann, H. H. Messer & G. G. Adams School of Dental Science, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 711 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia - **223 teeth** - infected root canals with acute apical periodontitis - **RC instrumentation “to the apices”** - 1% NaOCl + 15% EDTAC - **Ledermix paste**, Ca(OH)₂ or no dressing - **Pain scores:** Pre-op & for the next 4 days **Post-op Pain + Medicaments** Ehrmann et al - IEJ 2003 - **Ledermix group:** Significantly less post-operative pain than the Ca(OH)₂ group and the control group **Reduction in Pain Scores** | Legend | | | :--- | :--- | | --- Ledermix paste | | | · · · Ca(OH)₂ | | | · · No Medicament | | *Y-Axis:* Reduction in Pain Score (-50 to 0) *X-Axis:* Hours (0 to 100) **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 12  #### Clinical Study: Intracanal Medicaments and Postoperative Pain **Study Reference:** Ehrmann, E. H., Messer, H. H., & Adams, G. G. (2003). The relationship of intracanal medicaments to postoperative pain in endodontics. *International Endodontic Journal*, 36, 868-875. **Study Parameters:** - **Sample:** 223 teeth with infected root canals and acute apical periodontitis. - **Instrumentation:** Root canal instrumentation performed "to the apices" using 1% NaOCl and 15% EDTAC. - **Test Groups:** - Ledermix paste - Calcium Hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂) - Control (no dressing) - **Data Collection:** Pain scores recorded pre-operatively and for the following 4 days. #### Comparative Results - **Ledermix Group:** Demonstrated significantly less post-operative pain compared to both the Ca(OH)₂ group and the control group. - **Pain Score Reduction:** Data indicates a sharper reduction in pain scores over a 100-hour period for Ledermix paste compared to Ca(OH)₂ and no medicament. A line chart titled 'Reduction in Pain Scores' plotting pain score reduction over 100 hours. It compares three groups: Ledermix paste (solid line), Ca(OH)2 (dashed line), and No Medicament (dotted line), showing that the Ledermix group experienced a significantly greater reduction in pain. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Post-op Pain + Medicaments** **Ehrmann et al - IEJ 2003** - **Ledermix group:** **Significantly less post-operative pain than the Ca(OH)2 group and the control group** - **Started with higher average pre-op. pain score** - **At the 4 hours post-operative interval:** - The greatest effect was noted - Pain level was well below the other groups - **Pain level remained well below the other medicaments for the next 4 days** **Post-op Pain + Medicaments** **Ehrmann et al - IEJ 2003** **Average Pain Scores** - **Ledermix paste** - **Ca(OH)2** - **No Medicament** **Average Pain Score** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 13  #### Analysis of Pain Reduction (Ehrmann et al. 2003) - **Efficacy of Ledermix:** The Ledermix group showed significantly less post-operative pain than the Ca(OH)₂ and control groups. - **Baseline:** The Ledermix group started with a higher average pre-operative pain score. - **4-Hour Interval:** The greatest effect was noted at 4 hours post-operation, where pain levels dropped well below the other groups. - **Long-term Effect:** Pain levels remained consistently lower than other medicament groups for the duration of the 4-day study period. #### Average Pain Scores Comparison The study tracked average pain scores across three categories: 1. Ledermix paste 2. Calcium Hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂) 3. No Medicament A line chart titled 'Average Pain Scores' from Ehrmann et al. (IEJ 2003) comparing Ledermix paste, Ca(OH)2, and No Medicament. The graph illustrates that the Ledermix group had significantly lower average pain scores over time, with an inset zooming in on the initial rapid decrease in pain compared to other groups. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Post-op Pain + Medicaments** *Ehrmann et al - IEJ 2003* * **CONCLUDED:** **Ledermix paste is an effective intracanal medicament for the control of post-operative pain associated with acute apical periodontitis** * *“The rapidity of action of the medicament with corticosteroid was striking”* **Why Use Medicaments ?** * Anti-bacterial action * Residual bacteria in canals, tubules, fins, etc * Contaminants between visits * Periapical region * Periodontal tissues * Reduce periapical inflammation * Prevent or reduce pain * Stimulate periapical repair * **Prevent or inhibit inflammatory resorption** 2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023 Page 14 #### Study Conclusions - **Ledermix Efficacy:** Ledermix paste is an effective intracanal medicament for controlling post-operative pain associated with acute apical periodontitis. - **Speed of Action:** The corticosteroid component of the medicament provided a striking rapidity of action. #### Rationale for Medicament Use Intracanal medicaments are utilized for several clinical reasons: - **Anti-bacterial Action:** - Targeting residual bacteria in canals, tubules, and fins. - Preventing contaminants between visits. - Addressing bacteria in the periapical region and periodontal tissues. - **Inflammation Management:** Reducing periapical inflammation. - **Pain Management:** Preventing or reducing pain. - **Healing and Protection:** - Stimulating periapical repair. - Preventing or inhibiting inflammatory resorption. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Some case examples ...** **Pre-operative** **RCF - 15 mths** **4 yrs - Review** **So ... when treating infected canals ...** **Use two or more visits AND** **an intracanal medicament** **... to increase the** **PREDICTABILITY** of periapical **healing by** destroying more bacteria **and by** changing the environment **within the canal,** **PLUS** to reduce post-operative pain and external inflammatory root resorption **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 15**  #### Clinical Protocol for Infected Canals When treating infected root canals, a multi-visit approach is recommended: - **Two or More Visits:** Essential for predictable outcomes. - **Use of Intracanal Medicaments:** Increases the predictability of periapical healing by: - Destroying more bacteria. - Changing the environment within the canal. - Reducing post-operative pain. - Preventing external inflammatory root resorption. #### Case Observations Clinical case examples demonstrate the progression from pre-operative status to root canal filling (RCF) at 15 months, followed by a 4-year review, highlighting the success of these strategies. A sequence of three dental radiographs labeled "Pre-operative", "RCF - 15 mths", and "4 yrs - Review" that illustrate a case study of a root canal treatment and subsequent healing. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **So ... when treating infected canals ...** **Use two or more visits AND** **an intracanal medicament** **But ... what about when treating pulpitis** **or doing “elective endodontics” ?** **Suggested arguments for “one visit” -** * “Canals not infected” * “No apical periodontitis” 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 16    #### Considerations for Non-Infected Cases While multi-visit treatment is standard for infected canals, the approach for pulpitis or "elective endodontics" is often debated. **Common Arguments for Single-Visit Treatment:** - The canals are perceived as not being infected. - There is no evidence of apical periodontitis. A dental radiograph showing anterior teeth located in the upper section discussing treatment for infected canals, illustrating the clinical context for multi-visit procedures. A dental radiograph of posterior teeth with restorations, overlaid with a question mark box, used in the slide to visually represent the uncertainty of infection status when considering treatment visits. A dental radiograph of posterior teeth appearing in the lower blue section regarding 'elective endodontics', again marked with a question mark to prompt discussion on single-visit arguments. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **But ... what about when treating pulpitis or doing “elective endodontics” ?** **Suggested arguments for “one visit” -** **“Canals not infected”** **→ BUT consider what caused the pulpitis??** **✤ Bacteria in the coronal part of the tooth** **✤ 29% of pulpitis cases had bacteria isolated from samples taken from the root canal & pulp tissue** **> Hashimura et al IEJ 2001** **But ... what about when treating pulpitis or doing “elective endodontics” ?** **Suggested arguments for “one visit” -** **“Canals not infected”** **“No apical periodontitis”** **→ BUT irreversible pulpitis often has primary acute apical periodontitis associated with it** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 17** #### Challenging the Single-Visit Rationale **Argument: "Canals are not infected"** - **Counterpoint:** One must consider the cause of the pulpitis. Bacteria are typically present in the coronal part of the tooth. - **Evidence:** Research by Hashimura et al. (IEJ 2001) found that 29% of pulpitis cases had bacteria isolated from samples taken from the root canal and pulp tissue. **Argument: "No apical periodontitis"** - **Counterpoint:** Irreversible pulpitis is frequently associated with primary acute apical periodontitis, even if not immediately visible radiographically. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Sharp intense pain to heat, cold and biting** **Intense pain 10-15 minutes then dull ache for ~1 hour** **Worse when lying down; Woke patient during the night** Tooth 46: Acute Irreversible Pulpitis and 1° Acute Apical Periodontitis - due to Restoration Breakdown **But … what about when treating pulpitis or doing “elective endodontics” ?** **Is one visit OK ???** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 18   #### Clinical Presentation of Pulpitis A typical case of acute irreversible pulpitis and primary acute apical periodontitis (e.g., tooth 46 due to restoration breakdown) presents with: - Sharp, intense pain triggered by heat, cold, and biting. - Intense pain lasting 10-15 minutes, followed by a dull ache for approximately 1 hour. - Symptoms that worsen when lying down or wake the patient during the night. #### Treatment Question Given the bacterial presence and associated apical inflammation in pulpitis cases, the question remains: Is a single-visit treatment appropriate? A dental radiograph showing the roots of teeth with a red arrow pointing to the apex of Tooth 46, illustrating Acute Irreversible Pulpitis and Apical Periodontitis as described in the text below. A dental radiograph of teeth with restorations overlaid with a question mark icon, visually representing the query about the suitability of one-visit endodontics for pulpitis treatment. The user wants me to extract text from the provided image and format it. **1. Analyze the Input:** * **Image:** A slide titled "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2". It contains two main blue boxes with text. * **PDF Text:** This looks like a raw OCR dump of the slide content, but it's jumbled. It lists bullet points and then repeats some text at the bottom. It seems to have mixed up the two sections. * Top part of PDF: "Negative control group...", "10% had small radiolucencies developing..." * Middle part of PDF: "Radiographic periapical healing..." * Bottom part of PDF: "Negative controls - not infected...", "Most cases still had mild periapical inflammation..." * Top right of image: "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" * Bottom left/right of image: "2nd Year DMD - 2023", "Page 19" **2. Structure the Extraction:** I need to follow the visual layout as much as possible. * **Header:** "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" and "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" * **First Blue Box (Top):** * Title: "Radiographic periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals" (Yellow text) * Citation: "Katebzadeh et al/ IEJ 2000" (Green text) * Bullet point 1: "Negative control group" (White text) -> Sub-bullet: "Not infected but root filled" (Cyan text) -> Annotation: "Equivalent to 'elective' endodontic treatment" (Yellow text in a box) * Bullet point 2: "10% had small radiolucencies developing" (White text) -> Sub-bullet: "Irritation of periapical tissues" (Cyan text) -> Indent 1: "Mechanical procedures" (White/Light Purple) -> Indent 2: "Chemical materials - irrigants, RF's, etc" (White/Light Purple) * **Second Blue Box (Bottom):** * Title: "Histological periapical repair after obturation of infected root canals" (Yellow text) * Citation: "Katebzadeh et al J Endod 1999" (Cyan/Blue text) * Bullet point 1: "Negative controls - not infected, normal pulps; aseptically cleaned & root-filled; one visit" (Green text) -> Annotation: "Equivalent to 'elective' endodontic treatment" (Yellow text in a box) * Bullet point 2: "Most cases still had mild periapical inflammation present after 6 months" (Pink/Magenta text) -> Arrow: "Indicates that endodontic procedures are irritating to the periapical tissues -" (White text) -> Sub-bullet: "Even if treating teeth with 'normal pulps'" (Cyan text) * **Footer:** "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 19" **3. Formatting Rules:** * **Bold:** If text is in a different color (like yellow, cyan, pink), I should bold it or at least try to distinguish it. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". * **Tables/Flowcharts:** The prompt asks to format tables as HTML. There aren't strict tables here, but rather bullet points. I will use standard Markdown bullet points. * **Images:** The prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels... DO NOT return anything other than a few word description...". This is a slide with text, so I must transcribe the text. * **Context:** Use the PDF text to correct OCR errors if needed, but prioritize the image. The PDF text is a bit mixed up, so I will rely on the visual layout. **4. Drafting the Content:** * *Header:* **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** ... **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** * *Box 1:* * **Radiographic periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals** * **Katebzadeh et al/ IEJ 2000** * * **Negative control group** * * **Not infected but root filled** (Cyan/Bold) * (Note: There is a bracket pointing to "Equivalent to 'elective' endodontic treatment") -> **Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment** * * **10% had small radiolucencies developing** * * **Irritation of periapical tissues** (Cyan/Bold) * -> **Mechanical procedures** * -> **Chemical materials - irrigants, RF’s, etc** * *Box 2:* * **Histological periapical repair after obturation of infected root canals** * **Katebzadeh et al J Endod 1999** * (Note: Box pointing to "Equivalent to 'elective' endodontic treatment") -> **Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment** * * **Negative controls - not infected, normal pulps; aseptically cleaned & root-filled; one visit** (Green/Bold) * * **Most cases still had mild periapical inflammation present after 6 months** (Pink/Bold) * -> **Indicates that endodontic procedures are irritating to the periapical tissues -** * * **Even if treating teeth with “normal pulps”** (Cyan/Bold) * *Footer:* **2nd Year DMD - 2023** ... **Page 19** **Refining Colors/Bolding:** The prompt says: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." So, almost everything inside the blue boxes is colored (Yellow, Green, Cyan, Pink, White/Light Purple). Therefore, almost all text inside the boxes should be bold. Let's look at specific colors: * Box 1 Title: Yellow -> **Bold** * Box 1 Citation: Green -> **Bold** * "Negative control group": White -> Regular? Or Bold? The prompt says "different colour". White is standard. But "Not infected but root filled" is Cyan. * "Equivalent to...": Yellow -> **Bold** * "10% had...": White -> Regular? * "Irritation...": Cyan -> **Bold** * "Mechanical...": Light Purple/White -> Regular? * "Chemical...": Light Purple/White -> Regular? Actually, looking closely at the second box: * "Negative controls...": Green -> **Bold** * "Most cases still...": Pink -> **Bold** * "Indicates that...": White -> Regular? * "Even if treating...": Cyan -> **Bold** Let's try to be consistent. Text that stands out (headers, subheaders) is colored. Let's just bold the colored text as requested. **Revised Plan:** 1. Header: Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 ... W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO 2. Top Box: * **Radiographic periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals** (Yellow) * **Katebzadeh et al/ IEJ 2000** (Green) * * **Negative control group** (White - standard bullet) * * **Not infected but root filled** (Cyan - Bold) * (Right side box) **Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment** (Yellow - Bold) * * **10% had small radiolucencies developing** (White) * * **Irritation of periapical tissues** (Cyan - Bold) * -> **Mechanical procedures** (White/Purple - Regular) * -> **Chemical materials - irrigants, RF’s, etc** (White/Purple - Regular) 3. Bottom Box: * **Histological periapical repair after obturation of infected root canals** (Yellow) * **Katebzadeh et al J Endod 1999** (Cyan/Blue - Bold) * (Right side box) **Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment** (Yellow - Bold) * * **Negative controls - not infected, normal pulps; aseptically cleaned & root-filled; one visit** (Green - Bold) * * **Most cases still had mild periapical inflammation present after 6 months** (Pink - Bold) * -> **Indicates that endodontic procedures are irritating to the periapical tissues -** (White - Regular) * * **Even if treating teeth with “normal pulps”** (Cyan - Bold) 4. Footer: **2nd Year DMD - 2023** ... **Page 19** Wait, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". So I will apply bold to any text that isn't standard white/black. Let's refine the text transcription. Top Box: Title: Radiographic periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals Citation: Katebzadeh et al/ IEJ 2000 Bullet: Negative control group Sub-bullet: Not infected but root filled Annotation box: Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment Bullet: 10% had small radiolucencies developing Sub-bullet: Irritation of periapical tissues Sub-sub: Mechanical procedures Sub-sub: Chemical materials - irrigants, RF’s, etc Bottom Box: Title: Histological periapical repair after obturation of infected root canals Citation: Katebzadeh et al J Endod 1999 Annotation box: Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment Bullet: Negative controls - not infected, normal pulps; aseptically cleaned & root-filled; one visit Bullet: Most cases still had mild periapical inflammation present after 6 months Arrow: Indicates that endodontic procedures are irritating to the periapical tissues - Sub-bullet: Even if treating teeth with “normal pulps” Footer: 2nd Year DMD - 2023, Page 19 I will combine the header info at the top. One detail: "Katebzadeh et al/ IEJ 2000" in the top box. In the PDF it says "Katebzadeh et al IEJ 2000". In the image it looks like "Katebzadeh et al/ IEJ 2000". I'll stick to the image. In the bottom box: "Katebzadeh et al J Endod 1999". Let's assemble. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Radiographic periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals** **Katebzadeh et al/ IEJ 2000** * **Negative control group** * **Not infected but root filled** * *Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment* * **10% had small radiolucencies developing** * **Irritation of periapical tissues** * Mechanical procedures * Chemical materials - irrigants, RF’s, etc --- **Histological periapical repair after obturation of infected root canals** **Katebzadeh et al J Endod 1999** * **Negative controls - not infected, normal pulps; aseptically cleaned & root-filled; one visit** * *Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment* * **Most cases still had mild periapical inflammation present after 6 months** * Indicates that endodontic procedures are irritating to the periapical tissues - * **Even if treating teeth with “normal pulps”** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 19**   #### Radiographic Periapical Healing After Obturation **Radiographic periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals** **Katebzadeh et al/ IEJ 2000** - **Negative control group** - **Not infected but root filled** - **Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment** - 10% had small radiolucencies developing - **Irritation of periapical tissues** - Mechanical procedures - Chemical materials - irrigants, RF’s, etc. #### Histological Periapical Repair After Obturation **Histological periapical repair after obturation of infected root canals** **Katebzadeh et al J Endod 1999** - **Negative controls - not infected, normal pulps; aseptically cleaned & root-filled; one visit** - **Equivalent to “elective” endodontic treatment** - **Most cases still had mild periapical inflammation present after 6 months** - Indicates that endodontic procedures are irritating to the periapical tissues: - **Even if treating teeth with “normal pulps”** A slide section titled 'Radiographic periapical healing after obturation of infected root canals' citing Katebzadeh et al (2000). It indicates that in negative control groups (not infected), 10% developed small radiolucencies due to irritation from mechanical procedures or chemical materials used during treatment. A slide section titled 'Histological periapical repair after obturation of infected root canals' citing Katebzadeh et al (1999). It shows that even negative controls with normal pulps often had mild periapical inflammation after 6 months, suggesting that endodontic procedures can be irritating to periapical tissues. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2**            **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** --- # **Neuropathic Pain** * Lynch et al - *J Orofac Pain* 1996 * **Aetiology is not well understood** * **All cases followed a particular procedure / event** * **41% were related to root canal treatment** * But no detail re original diagnosis * **Other causes: blunt trauma (23%), other dental surgery (12%), other local surgery (18%), other (6%)** * **50% had further dental surgical procedures** * But either no change in pain or the pain was worse # **Consider ...** * Removing the pulp implies severing the nerve fibres * **This will invoke periapical inflammation** * *Even when removing a "normal pulp"* * Holland GR - *OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo* 1995 --- **2nd Year DMD - 2023**            **Page 20** #### Research Findings on Neuropathic Pain - Lynch et al - *J Orofac Pain* 1996 - Aetiology is not well understood. - All cases followed a particular procedure or event. - 41% were related to root canal treatment (though no detail regarding original diagnosis was provided). - Other causes included: - Blunt trauma (23%) - Other dental surgery (12%) - Other local surgery (18%) - Other (6%) - 50% had further dental surgical procedures, resulting in either no change in pain or worsening of the pain. #### Clinical Considerations - Removing the pulp implies severing the nerve fibres. - This will invoke periapical inflammation, even when removing a "normal pulp" (Holland GR - *OS:OM:OP:OR:Endo* 1995). **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO * The neural response to removing the pulp is a derangement of the plexus of nerves around the apical third of the root * **Holland - 1995** * The neural response to removing the pulp is a derangement of the plexus of nerves around the apical third of the root: * **Disorganised axon “sprouting” and branching** * **Some features are similar to neuromas** * **Holland - 1995** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 21   #### Neural Response to Pulp Removal - The neural response to removing the pulp is a derangement of the plexus of nerves around the apical third of the root (Holland - 1995). - Characteristics of this response include: - Disorganised axon “sprouting” and branching. - Features similar to neuromas. A slide from a presentation on Anti-Bacterial Strategies illustrating the neural response to removing the pulp, featuring a schematic of a nerve being cut and text explaining the derangement of the nerve plexus around the apical third of the root (Holland - 1995). A slide depicting the subsequent neural response, showing a diagram of disorganised axon 'sprouting' and branching similar to neuromas, with text detailing the features of the nerve plexus derangement. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Normal neuron** **Neuron - 2 weeks after being cut** **Vickers - AEJ 2000** **Normal periapical region - some nerves evident** **Persistent inflammation - 3 months after RCF** **Holland - 1995** 100 µm **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 22   #### Histological Observations - Vickers - AEJ 2000: - Normal neuron. - Neuron 2 weeks after being cut. - Holland - 1995: - Normal periapical region with some nerves evident. - Persistent inflammation 3 months after Root Canal Filling (RCF). A composite figure illustrating neuronal regeneration. It includes a schematic diagram of a neuron with axon branching, a photo labeled 'Normal neuron', and a micrograph labeled 'Neuron - 2 weeks after being cut' showing regenerating fibers, attributed to Vickers - AEJ 2000. A comparative figure showing tissue micrographs. On the left is a 'Normal periapical region - some nerves evident' showing tissue structure, and on the right is a 'Persistent inflammation - 3 months after RCF' showing inflamed tissue with scale bars, attributed to Holland - 1995. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Stained to show nerves** **- 3 months after RCF** **Higher Magnification** **- 3 months after RCF** [Image of micrographs showing nerve tissue at 100 µm and 25 µm scales] **Holland - 1995** Response differs after “natural amputation” **e.g. deciduous exfoliation, pulp necrosis** **In these cases, healing occurs gradually and nerves grow out to innervate new target tissues:** **e.g. gingivae, bone, periodontal ligament** **Holland - 1995** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 23**   #### Nerve Tissue Changes Post-RCF - Histological staining 3 months after RCF shows nerve tissue changes at both standard and higher magnification (Holland - 1995). #### Natural Amputation vs. Surgical Removal - The response differs after “natural amputation” (e.g., deciduous exfoliation, pulp necrosis). - In natural cases, healing occurs gradually and nerves grow out to innervate new target tissues, such as: - Gingivae - Bone - Periodontal ligament Micrographs showing nerve tissue stained to show nerves 3 months after RCF (Root Canal Filling). The left image displays a wider view at 100 µm scale with a red box indicating the region of interest, while the right image shows a higher magnification view at 25 µm scale revealing nerve fibers. The figure cites Holland - 1995. A schematic diagram illustrating the concept of 'natural amputation' in dentistry, showing a nerve branching into multiple star-like endings to represent innervation. The text explains that in cases of deciduous exfoliation or pulp necrosis, healing occurs gradually with nerves growing out to innervate new target tissues like gingivae, bone, or periodontal ligament. This is also attributed to Holland - 1995. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** Inflammatory and neural changes continue for **at least one year** after root canal treatment - **Experiments done in cats** - **? Humans - may be longer** This can explain the “different sensation” / “discomfort” / “awareness” reported by some patients after endodontic treatment **Holland - 1995** The neural and inflammatory responses can be **greatly reduced** - *but not totally eliminated* - by using **corticosteroids** - **Holland - used C-St’s systemically in cats** - **In humans - we can use intra-canal C-St’s** **Holland - 1995** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 24**   #### Duration of Changes - Inflammatory and neural changes continue for at least one year after root canal treatment. - Experiments conducted in cats; duration in humans may be longer. - This explains the “different sensation,” “discomfort,” or “awareness” reported by some patients after endodontic treatment (Holland - 1995). #### Mitigation Strategies - Neural and inflammatory responses can be greatly reduced (but not totally eliminated) by using corticosteroids. - Systemic use was studied in cats. - Intra-canal corticosteroids can be used in humans. A schematic red diagram illustrating a branching structure, likely representing nerve fibers or vessels, positioned above text discussing how inflammatory and neural changes continue for at least one year after root canal treatment. An identical red schematic diagram of a branching structure, placed above text explaining that neural and inflammatory responses can be greatly reduced but not totally eliminated by using corticosteroids. ### Post-Operative Pain - Irreversible Pulpitis & Elective Endodontics Rogers et al J Endod 1999 **Results (adjusted for pre-treatment pain)** | Time Interval | Ibuprofen (oral) | Placebo (oral) | Dexamethasone | Ketorolac | | :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | | **6 hrs** | Mean Pain Score Height 1 | Mean Pain Score Height 2 | Mean Pain Score Height 3 | Mean Pain Score Height 4 | | **12 hrs** | Height | Height | Height* | Height* | | **24 hrs** | Height | Height | Height* | Height* | | **48 hrs** | Height | Height | Height* | Height* | *\*Note: Stars in the second chart indicate statistical significance for Dexamethasone and Ketorolac at 12, 24, and 48 hours compared to other groups.*   #### Post-Operative Pain Management Study - Rogers et al *J Endod* 1999: Irreversible Pulpitis & Elective Endodontics. #### Comparative Results (Adjusted for Pre-treatment Pain) - Data indicates mean pain scores across different time intervals for various treatments: 1. **6 hours**: Comparative scores for Ibuprofen (oral), Placebo (oral), Dexamethasone, and Ketorolac. 2. **12, 24, and 48 hours**: Dexamethasone and Ketorolac showed statistically significant reductions in pain compared to other groups. This bar chart displays mean pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours comparing oral Ibuprofen to a placebo, showing a trend where both groups experience decreasing pain over time. This bar chart compares the mean pain scores of four treatment groups—Ibuprofen, Placebo, Dexamethasone, and Ketorolac—across the same time intervals, highlighting statistical significance (marked with stars) for Dexamethasone and Ketorolac at 12, 24, and 48 hours. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **So … when treating pulpitis or electively removing “normal pulps” …** **Use two or more visits and an intracanal medicament** ... **to** *reduce periapical inflammation*, **to** *reduce nerve sprouting*, **to** *reduce pain* **and** **to** *ensure no bacteria* *remain in the root* **canal system** **Endodontic Medicaments** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 26**  #### Clinical Protocol for Pulpitis and Elective Removal - When treating pulpitis or electively removing “normal pulps,” use two or more visits and an intracanal medicament. - Objectives of this approach: - Reduce periapical inflammation. - Reduce nerve sprouting. - Reduce pain. - Ensure no bacteria remain in the root canal system. A composite image showing dental supplies including syringes and tubes inside an oval frame, overlaid with three large, colorful question marks, visually representing the topic of Endodontic Medicaments. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Endodontic Medicaments** **Choices:** * Corticosteroid / antibiotic - CS / Ab * e.g. **Ledermix paste** * Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)2 * e.g. **Calasept Plus paste** * 50:50 mixture - CS / Ab + Ca(OH)2 * e.g. **Ledermix** + **Calasept Plus** * e.g. **Ledermix** + **Pulpdent** **Endodontic Medicaments** **Major Functions and Choices:** <table> <tr> <td><b>Anti-inflammatory</b></td> <td><b>e.g. Acute Irreversible Pulpitis; Acute Apical Periodontitis</b></td> <td><b>Ledermix paste</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Anti-bacteria!</td> <td><b>e.g. Root-filled + infected RCS; Pulpless, infected RCS</b></td> <td><b>Ledermix paste</b><br><b>Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)2</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>Stimulate hard tissue repair</b></td> <td><b>e.g. Apexification</b></td> <td><b>Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)2</b></td> </tr> </table> 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 27   #### Medicament Choices - **Corticosteroid / Antibiotic (CS / Ab)**: e.g., Ledermix paste. - **Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2)**: e.g., Calasept Plus paste. - **50:50 Mixture**: CS / Ab + Ca(OH)2 (e.g., Ledermix + Calasept Plus or Ledermix + Pulpdent). #### Major Functions and Clinical Indications - **Anti-inflammatory**: - Indications: Acute Irreversible Pulpitis; Acute Apical Periodontitis. - Choice: Ledermix paste. - **Anti-bacterial**: - Indications: Root-filled + infected RCS; Pulpless, infected RCS. - Choices: Ledermix paste, Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)2. - **Stimulate Hard Tissue Repair**: - Indications: Apexification. - Choice: Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)2. A slide titled 'Endodontic Medicaments Choices' listing three categories of medicaments: Corticosteroid/antibiotic (e.g., Ledermix paste), Calcium hydroxide (e.g., Calasept Plus paste), and a 50:50 mixture, accompanied by product photographs. A table titled 'Endodontic Medicaments Major Functions and Choices' categorizing medicaments by function: Anti-inflammatory (Ledermix paste for Acute Irreversible Pulpitis), Anti-bacterial (Ledermix and Calcium hydroxide for infected RCS), and Stimulate hard tissue repair (Calcium hydroxide for Apexification). **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** *** **Endodontic Medicaments** **Abbott PV.** *Australian Dental Journal* **Literature Review** → 1990; 35: 438-48 **Guidelines for Clinical Use** → 1990; 35: 491-6 *** **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** * ➢ **Ledermix paste** * ➢ **Odontopaste** * ➢ Septomixine Forte paste * ➢ Pulpomixine paste *** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 28** #### Literature and Guidelines - Abbott PV. *Australian Dental Journal*: - Literature Review: 1990; 35: 438-48. - Guidelines for Clinical Use: 1990; 35: 491-6. #### Available Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments - Ledermix paste - Odontopaste - Septomixine Forte paste - Pulpomixine paste The user wants me to extract text from the provided image and format it in Markdown. I need to look at the image and the provided PDF text. The image contains two slides. Slide 1 (top): - Header: Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2, W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO - Slide Title: Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments (Green text) - Image: A tube of "SEPTOMIXINE FORTE" with a big red cross over it. - Bullet points (white text): - Septomixine Forte paste (crossed out) - Pulpomixine paste (crossed out) Slide 2 (bottom): - Slide Title: Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments (Green text) - Bullet point (Yellow/Orange): Odontopaste - Sub-points: - Similar to Ledermix paste - But the AB is Clindamycin - Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally) - Image: A box and tube of "ODONTOPASTE" - Bullet point: Only one paper published in a journal - Sub-points: - Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings - Bullet point: Provides an alternative for some cases - Sub-points: - e.g. If an infection is not responding - e.g. If discolouration is a concern Footer: 2nd Year DMD - 2023, Page 29 The prompt asks to prioritize image text but use PDF text for context. The prompt asks to format text in bold if it's a different color. The prompt asks to format tables in HTML (none here really, just lists). The prompt asks to treat figure-only pages as images. This isn't a figure-only page. Let's organize the text. **Header:** Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Slide 1:** **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** (Green) * Septomixine Forte paste * Pulpomixine paste (Note: There is a big red cross over this slide content, implying these are perhaps discontinued or not recommended, or maybe just the specific product shown is crossed out. The text "Septomixine Forte paste" and "Pulpomixine paste" are white. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". The green title is bold. The white text is standard. Wait, looking closely at the second slide, "Odontopaste" is yellow/orange. "Similar to Ledermix paste" is white. "But the AB is Clindamycin" is yellow. "Also 1-2%..." is yellow. "Only one paper..." is white. "Re: mixing..." is yellow. "Provides an alternative..." is white. "e.g. If..." are yellow.) Let's refine the color/bold mapping based on the prompt: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." This likely means distinct colors from the standard white text on blue background. **Slide 1 Text:** **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** * Septomixine Forte paste * Pulpomixine paste **Slide 2 Text:** **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** * **Odontopaste** (Yellow) * Similar to Ledermix paste * **But the AB is Clindamycin** (Yellow) * **Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally)** (Yellow) * **Only one paper published in a journal** (White, but distinct section) -> Actually looking at the image, the arrow is blue, text is white. * **Provides an alternative for some cases** (White) * e.g. If an infection is not responding (Yellow) * e.g. If discolouration is a concern (Yellow) Wait, let's look at the colors again. Slide 2: - Title: Green -> Bold - Bullet: Yellow "Odontopaste" -> Bold - Sub-bullet: Blue arrow, White text "Similar to Ledermix paste" - Sub-bullet: Blue arrow, Yellow text "But the AB is Clindamycin" -> Bold - Sub-bullet: Blue arrow, Yellow text "Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally)" -> Bold - Bullet: Blue arrow, White text "Only one paper published in a journal" -> Bold? No, standard white. But it's a main header for that section. Let's stick to the prompt's "different colour... formatted as bold". - Sub-bullet: Blue arrow, Yellow text "Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings" -> Bold - Bullet: Blue arrow, White text "Provides an alternative for some cases" - Sub-bullet: Blue arrow, Yellow text "e.g. If an infection is not responding" -> Bold - Sub-bullet: Blue arrow, Yellow text "e.g. If discolouration is a concern" -> Bold Let's look at the PDF text provided to see if it clarifies structure. PDF Text: Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments Ledermix paste Odontopaste Septomixine Forte paste Pulpomixine paste Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments Odontopaste Similar to Ledermix paste But the AB is Clindamycin Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally) Only one paper published in a journal Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings Provides an alternative for some cases e.g. If an infection is not responding e.g. If discolouration is a concern The PDF text seems to be an index or summary of the slides, not a perfect transcription. The prompt says "Prioritize image text". So I will follow the visual layout of the slides. **Slide 1:** - Header: Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 / W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO - Slide Title: **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** (Green) - Image: Tube of Septomixine Forte crossed out. - Text: Septomixine Forte paste - Text: Pulpomixine paste **Slide 2:** - Slide Title: **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** (Green) - Text: **Odontopaste** (Yellow) - Text: Similar to Ledermix paste - Text: **But the AB is Clindamycin** (Yellow) - Text: **Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally)** (Yellow) - Text: Only one paper published in a journal - Text: **Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings** (Yellow) - Text: Provides an alternative for some cases - Text: **e.g. If an infection is not responding** (Yellow) - Text: **e.g. If discolouration is a concern** (Yellow) - Image: Box and tube of Odontopaste. Footer: 2nd Year DMD - 2023 / Page 29 Let's construct the final output. I will use bolding for the colored text as requested. Top Header: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** Slide 1 Content: **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** (There is an image of a tube with a red cross over it) * Septomixine Forte paste * Pulpomixine paste Slide 2 Content: **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** * **Odontopaste** * Similar to Ledermix paste * **But the AB is Clindamycin** * **Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally)** * Only one paper published in a journal * **Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings** * Provides an alternative for some cases * **e.g. If an infection is not responding** * **e.g. If discolouration is a concern** (There is an image of a box and tube of Odontopaste) Footer: **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 29** Wait, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". Green text: **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** Yellow text: **Odontopaste**, **But the AB is Clindamycin**, **Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2”...**, **Re: mixing...**, **e.g. If...**, **e.g. If...** White text: Similar to Ledermix paste, Only one paper..., Provides an alternative... Let's refine the "Odontopaste" section structure. The slide has: -> Odontopaste (Yellow, bolded bullet) -> Similar to Ledermix paste (White text, blue arrow) - But the AB is Clindamycin (Yellow text) - Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2”... (Yellow text) -> Only one paper published in a journal (White text, blue arrow) - Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2... (Yellow text) -> Provides an alternative for some cases (White text, blue arrow) - e.g. If an infection... (Yellow text) - e.g. If discolouration... (Yellow text) Actually, looking at the indentation: "Similar to Ledermix paste" is a sub-bullet to Odontopaste. "Only one paper..." is a main bullet (blue arrow). "Provides an alternative..." is a main bullet (blue arrow). So structure: **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** * **Odontopaste** * Similar to Ledermix paste * **But the AB is Clindamycin** * **Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally)** * **Only one paper published in a journal** (Wait, looking closely, the text is white. The arrow is blue/cyan. I will keep it white unless it's clearly a different color family. The prompt says "different colour". White on blue is standard. Yellow/Green are "different".) * **Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings** * **Provides an alternative for some cases** * **e.g. If an infection is not responding** * **e.g. If discolouration is a concern** Wait, looking at "Only one paper published in a journal" - the text is white. "Provides an alternative for some cases" - the text is white. "Similar to Ledermix paste" - the text is white. So only the Green Title and Yellow sub-points/text should be bolded. Let's re-verify the "Septomixine Forte paste" slide. The text "Septomixine Forte paste" and "Pulpomixine paste" are white. The title is green. Okay, ready to write. I will put the two slides in sequence. I will ignore the red cross and just transcribe the text underneath it as it appears valid text. The prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels... DO NOT return anything other than a few word description". The top slide has an image of a tube with a cross. The text below it is "Septomixine Forte paste" and "Pulpomixine paste". The tube itself is labeled "SEPTOMIXINE FORTE". I should probably mention the image briefly or just transcribe the text. The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image". So I will transcribe the text on the tube if readable. "SEPTOMIXINE FORTE" is readable. "TRAITEMENT MIXTE POLYANTIBIOTIQUE ET CORTICOTHERAPIQUE" is readable but small. I'll stick to the main slide text to avoid clutter, but the prompt says "Extract all of the text". I'll include the tube text if it's clear. Actually, the prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure". This is a slide with text *and* an image. I will transcribe the slide text. I will include the text on the tube as it is part of the "image" content but it's also text on the slide. "SEPTOMIXINE FORTE" "TRAITEMENT MIXTE" "POLYANTIBIOTIQUE ET CORTICOTHERAPIQUE" Bottom slide image: "ODONTOPASTE" "root canal medicament" "A M" I will include these as they are text within the image on the slide. Final plan: 1. Header info. 2. Slide 1 content (Title, Image description/text, Bullet points). 3. Slide 2 content (Title, Bullet points with structure, Image text). 4. Footer info. Bold formatting: - Green text: **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** - Yellow text: **Odontopaste**, **But the AB is Clindamycin**, **Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally)**, **Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings**, **e.g. If an infection is not responding**, **e.g. If discolouration is a concern**. Wait, looking at "Only one paper published in a journal". The text is white. Looking at "Provides an alternative for some cases". The text is white. Looking at "Similar to Ledermix paste". The text is white. Let's check the PDF text again. PDF has "Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments" at the top as a list item too. This seems to be a summary of the whole section. I will focus on the slide content primarily as requested ("Extract all of the text from this image"). One detail: The red cross. It's a graphical element. I won't transcribe it as text, but I might note it if it crosses out the text. The text "Septomixine Forte paste" and "Pulpomixine paste" are underneath the cross, but visually the cross covers the image above them. The text "Septomixine Forte paste" is clearly meant to be read. Let's go. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** ( Image of a tube labeled "SEPTOMIXINE FORTE" with a red cross over it ) * Septomixine Forte paste * Pulpomixine paste **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** * **Odontopaste** * Similar to Ledermix paste * **But the AB is Clindamycin** * **Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally)** * Only one paper published in a journal * **Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings** * Provides an alternative for some cases * **e.g. If an infection is not responding** * **e.g. If discolouration is a concern** ( Image of a box and tube labeled "ODONTOPASTE root canal medicament" ) **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 29**   #### Discontinued or Non-Recommended Medicaments - Septomixine Forte paste - Pulpomixine paste #### Odontopaste Characteristics - **Odontopaste** - Similar to Ledermix paste - **But the AB is Clindamycin** - **Also “1-2% Ca(OH)2” - has varied (e.g. 5% originally)** #### Clinical Evidence and Research - Only one paper published in a journal - **Re: mixing with Ca(OH)2 - but methodology was flawed & another study has been done to refute the findings** #### Clinical Indications - Provides an alternative for some cases - **e.g. If an infection is not responding** - **e.g. If discolouration is a concern** A photograph of a 'SEPTOMIXINE FORTE' tube with a large red cross drawn over it, indicating the product is discontinued or not recommended. A photograph of the 'ODONTOPASTE' product packaging, displaying both the box and the applicator tube. # **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO ## **Corticosteroid/Antibiotic Medicaments** * **Ledermix paste** * Developed in 1960 (Prof. André Schroeder) * Commercially available since 1962 * **52 years of research and clinical use !** ## **Ledermix Paste** ### **Components** * Triamcinolone - 1% * Demeclocycline - 3% * **_In a water soluble paste of:_** * Triethanolamine NF * Calcium chloride USP * Zinc oxide * Sodium sulphite (anhydrous) * Polyethylene glycol 4,000 USP * Distilled water 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 30   #### Historical Background - Developed in 1960 by Prof. André Schroeder - Commercially available since 1962 - Supported by over 52 years of research and clinical use #### Chemical Composition Ledermix paste consists of active pharmacological agents in a water-soluble base: - **Active Ingredients:** - Triamcinolone: 1% - Demeclocycline: 3% - **Vehicle and Excipients:** - Triethanolamine NF - Calcium chloride USP - Zinc oxide - Sodium sulphite (anhydrous) - Polyethylene glycol 4,000 USP - Distilled water A photo showing the packaging and tube of Ledermix paste, a corticosteroid/antibiotic medicament developed in 1960 and commercially available since 1962. A smaller photo of the Ledermix paste tube and box, placed next to the list of components including Triamcinolone and Demeclocycline. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Ledermix Paste - Release and Diffusion through Dentine** **Abbott PV, Hume WR, Heithersay GS.** ***Endod Dent Traumatol*** 1988; 4: 55-62 1989; 5: 92-7 1989; 5: 98-104 1989; 5: 188-92 **2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023** **Page 31**  #### Research on Release and Diffusion through Dentine Key studies regarding the diffusion of Ledermix paste components (Abbott PV, Hume WR, Heithersay GS) published in *Endodontics & Dental Traumatology*: - 1988; 4: 55-62 - 1989; 5: 92-7 - 1989; 5: 98-104 - 1989; 5: 188-92 A line chart illustrating the 'Rate of Release' of Ledermix paste over time, based on studies by Abbott et al. (1988, 1989). The graph shows a very rapid initial release that transitions to a slow, steady release, maintaining therapeutic levels up to approximately 6 weeks. # Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Ledermix paste - Diffusion: Abbott et al EDT 1988, 1989** **Ledermix paste - Diffusion: Abbott et al EDT 1988, 1989** **Triamcinolone** **(Corticosteroid)** **> Measured peri-radicular concentration** **> Detected in nanomolar range** **è Sufficient for anti-inflammatory action** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 32   #### Triamcinolone Diffusion Characteristics Based on the research by Abbott et al. (1988, 1989), the corticosteroid component (Triamcinolone) exhibits the following properties: - Measured peri-radicular concentration is detected in the nanomolar range. - This concentration is sufficient for effective anti-inflammatory action. A schematic diagram illustrating the diffusion of Ledermix paste within a root canal system, citing Abbott et al. (1988, 1989). It depicts numbered zones indicating diffusion pathways (labeled 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) from the canal space towards the peri-radicular tissues. A smaller schematic of the tooth root shown alongside text discussing Triamcinolone. Red arrows connect parts of the diagram to text stating that Triamcinolone concentration is measured in the nanomolar range and is sufficient for anti-inflammatory action. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2**                **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Ledermix paste - Diffusion: *Abbott et al EDT 1988, 1989*** **Concentrations of *Demeclocycline* in root dentine after Ledermix paste has been applied within the root canal** | | **1 DAY** | **1 WEEK** | | :--- | :---: | :---: | | (Top root section) | 200 | 20 | | | 20 | 2 | | | 15 | 1.5 | | (Apical section) | 200 | 20 | | | 30 | 3 | | | 15 | 1.5 | *micrograms/millilitre* --- **Ledermix Paste** *Can be used in endodontic therapy for its:* * **Anti-inflammatory action** * :: reduces and prevents pain * :: reduces “nerve sprouting” * **Anti-bacterial action** * :: helps to reduce inflammation * :: starts the healing processes * **Inhibition of clastic cells** * :: reduces resorption of tooth and bone * **Inhibition of PMN neutrophil collagenase** * :: reduces tissue destruction <br> **2nd Year DMD - 2023**                                    &    #### Demeclocycline Concentrations in Root Dentine The following table illustrates the concentrations of Demeclocycline (measured in micrograms/millilitre) within root dentine after the application of Ledermix paste: | Root Section | 1 Day | 1 Week | | :--- | :---: | :---: | | Top root section | 200 | 20 | | | 20 | 2 | | | 15 | 1.5 | | Apical section | 200 | 20 | | | 30 | 3 | | | 15 | 1.5 | #### Clinical Therapeutic Actions Ledermix paste is utilized in endodontic therapy for several specific biological effects: - **Anti-inflammatory action:** - Reduces and prevents pain - Reduces "nerve sprouting" - **Anti-bacterial action:** - Helps to reduce inflammation - Initiates the healing processes - **Inhibition of clastic cells:** - Reduces resorption of tooth structure and bone - **Inhibition of PMN neutrophil collagenase:** - Reduces tissue destruction A schematic diagram of a tooth root illustrating the diffusion of Ledermix paste, with arrows pointing from the canal contents to specific zones in the dentine. A table displaying concentrations of Demeclocycline in root dentine (micrograms/millilitre) at 1 day and 1 week intervals for top and apical root sections. A photograph of Ledermix paste packaging, including a box and a tube, displayed next to the list of its therapeutic actions. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Calcium Hydroxide** * **Commercial preparations of Ca(OH)₂** * Saline base * **Calasept Plus** * **DT** * Methyl-cellulose base * **Pulpdent paste** * Powder - to mix with various liquids * Impregnated on GP points * **Roeko** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 34**  #### Commercial Preparations of Calcium Hydroxide Various formulations of Ca(OH)₂ are available for clinical use: - **Saline base:** - Calasept Plus - DT - **Methyl-cellulose base:** - Pulpdent paste - **Powder form:** - Designed to be mixed with various liquids - **Impregnated Gutta-Percha (GP) points:** - Roeko ... The user wants me to extract text from the provided image. The image contains two main slides from a presentation. I need to transcribe the text, prioritizing the image text but using the provided PDF text for context/correction. I need to handle formatting: - Bold text if it's colored (yellow/green/cyan usually implies emphasis or headers). - Tables in HTML (none visible as standard tables, but lists exist). - Flowcharts as tables (none really, just diagrams). - Images only with labels: Describe briefly and wrap in ` tags." - Actually, the diagram has numbers 1-11. It's a bit sparse. I will describe it. - The bottom slide has substantial text. - The PDF text provided seems to be a messy OCR attempt of the slides. I will clean it up using the image visual. - The prompt says "Prioritize image text". **Refining the Output Structure:** **Header:** **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Slide 1 Content:** **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 (Description of the figure) *Fig. 1: Diagram of tooth roots showing various shapes and measurements (1-11) marked with green checkmarks and yellow plus signs.* *(Wait, the prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags.")* Okay, so for the top part with the tooth diagram, I should probably just describe it or ignore the numbers if they are just labels. The prompt says "Extract all of the text... use pdf text for context". The PDF text lists numbers like "1", "2", "3,4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10", "11". This suggests the numbers are text. Let's look at the instruction again: "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure". The numbers 1-11 are labels pointing to parts of the diagram. They don't have context (like "1 = width"). So I should probably treat the whole top slide as a figure or just describe it. However, the top slide has a title "Calcium Hydroxide" and a citation. That is text. Let's try to include the text that is standalone. Title: **Calcium Hydroxide** Citation: G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 Figure: Diagram showing root canal preparations. **Slide 2 Content:** **Calcium Hydroxide** * Ca(OH)2 is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world * Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity * Other very useful properties: * Stimulates hard tissue formation * Helps dissolve necrotic tissue * Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS) * Safavi & Nicholls 1993, 1994; Olsen et al 1999, Nelson-Filho et al 2002a, 2002b, Silva et al 2002, Jiang et al 2003, Tanomaru et al 2003 Footer: 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 35 Let's re-read the specific instruction about images: "If the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." The top part is an image. It has the title "Calcium Hydroxide" above it. I will include the title. The numbers 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 are labels. I will not transcribe the numbers as text blocks because they are labels without context. I will describe the image. Wait, the prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image... use the pdf text for context...". The PDF text provided has a list of numbers: "1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11". This confirms they are present. But the instruction "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure". The numbers 1-11 are definitely labels. They are attached to arrows. So, for the top slide: I will write the Title and Citation. Then I will describe the image. Actually, looking at the layout, it's a slide. Top Section: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO [Line] **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 [Image of tooth roots with numbered labels] Bottom Section: **Calcium Hydroxide** Ca(OH)2 is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world * Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity * Other very useful properties: * Stimulates hard tissue formation * Helps dissolve necrotic tissue * Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS) * Safavi & Nicholls 1993, 1994; Olsen et al 1999, Nelson-Filho et al 2002a, 2002b, Silva et al 2002, Jiang et al 2003, Tanomaru et al 2003 Footer: 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 35 Let's refine the "Image only" part. The prompt says: "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." The top slide has text "Calcium Hydroxide" and "G. Heithersay...". This is not "sparse text" in a way that belongs to the figure. It's a slide title. However, the diagram itself has labels 1-11. I will transcribe the slide title and citation. Then I will describe the diagram. Actually, looking at the provided "PDF Text", it lists the numbers. It seems the OCR tool that generated the PDF text picked them up. But I am the AI now. I need to follow the instruction: "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text". The numbers 1, 2, 3,4 etc. are labels. They have no context (e.g., "1 = width"). So I should NOT return them as text. So, for the top part: **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 Wait, the prompt also says "Extract all of the text from this image...". And "Format tables in HTML... and flowcharts as tables...". The top image is not a table or flowchart. It's a diagram. So I will use the ` tags." This implies I shouldn't try to transcribe the labels. So: **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 Now for the bottom slide. It has text. **Calcium Hydroxide** Ca(OH)2 is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world * Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity * Other very useful properties: * Stimulates hard tissue formation * Helps dissolve necrotic tissue * Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS) * Safavi & Nicholls 1993, 1994; Olsen et al 1999, Nelson-Filho et al 2002a, 2002b, Silva et al 2002, Jiang et al 2003, Tanomaru et al 2003 Colors: - "Calcium Hydroxide" (Top) is Yellow. -> Bold? Or Header. I'll use Bold for headers. - "G. Heithersay..." is White/Grey. - "Ca(OH)2..." is Cyan. -> Bold? It's a main point. - "Mainly because..." is White. - "Other very useful..." is White. - "Stimulates...", "Helps...", "Detoxifies..." are Green. -> Bold/Italic? The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." - The references at the bottom are Yellow. -> Bold. Let's look at the first slide again. "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" is Black. "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" is Black. "Calcium Hydroxide" is Yellow. -> **Calcium Hydroxide** "G. Heithersay..." is White. Let's look at the second slide again. "Calcium Hydroxide" is Yellow. -> **Calcium Hydroxide** "Ca(OH)2 is the most..." is Cyan. -> **Ca(OH)2 is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world** (Cyan is distinct). "Mainly because..." is White. "Other very useful..." is White. "Stimulates hard tissue formation" is Green. -> **Stimulates hard tissue formation** "Helps dissolve necrotic tissue" is Green. -> **Helps dissolve necrotic tissue** "Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS)" is Green. -> **Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS)** References: Yellow. -> **Safavi & Nicholls...** Wait, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." This usually means distinct from the main body text. Yellow headers -> Bold. Cyan bullet -> Bold. Green bullets -> Bold. Yellow references -> Bold. Let's construct the final output. **Header:** **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Slide 1:** **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 **Slide 2:** **Calcium Hydroxide** **Ca(OH)2 is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world** * Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity * Other very useful properties: * **Stimulates hard tissue formation** * **Helps dissolve necrotic tissue** * **Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS)** * **Safavi & Nicholls 1993, 1994; Olsen et al 1999, Nelson-Filho et al 2002a, 2002b, Silva et al 2002, Jiang et al 2003, Tanomaru et al 2003** **Footer:** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 35 Re-evaluating the "Image only" rule. "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." The top part is a slide containing a figure. The text "Calcium Hydroxide" and the citation are part of the slide layout, not the figure itself. The figure itself has labels 1-11. So I will write the title and citation, then the image tag. The numbers 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 are labels. I will not transcribe them individually as text because they lack context. One detail: The PDF text provided has "1 check, 2 check, 3,4 check...". It seems to have interpreted the green checkmarks as text. The image shows green checks next to numbers. The prompt says "use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". But the instruction "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... do not return the text". This is a conflict. If I return the numbers, I am returning text that only makes sense in the context of the figure. So I should NOT return the numbers. I will stick to describing the figure. Final check on formatting. "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible" There are no tables. "If the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." The top slide is essentially a figure with a title. I will treat the top block as: **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 Actually, looking at the layout, it's a single page with two slides. I will separate them clearly. Let's look at the colors again. Top slide title: Yellow. Bottom slide title: Yellow. Top slide text "Calcium Hydroxide" is yellow. Bottom slide text "Calcium Hydroxide" is yellow. Bottom slide "Ca(OH)2..." is Cyan. Bottom slide bullets "Stimulates...", "Helps...", "Detoxifies..." are Green. Bottom slide references are Yellow. The prompt says: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." So: **Calcium Hydroxide** (Yellow) **Ca(OH)2...** (Cyan) **Stimulates...** (Green) **Helps...** (Green) **Detoxifies...** (Green) **Safavi...** (Yellow) This seems consistent. One small correction: The top slide has "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" at the very top. This is the document header. I should include it. And "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO". And the footer "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 35". Let's assemble. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO --- **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 --- **Calcium Hydroxide** **Ca(OH)2 is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world** * Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity * Other very useful properties: * **Stimulates hard tissue formation** * **Helps dissolve necrotic tissue** * **Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS)** * **Safavi & Nicholls 1993, 1994; Olsen et al 1999, Nelson-Filho et al 2002a, 2002b, Silva et al 2002, Jiang et al 2003, Tanomaru et al 2003** --- 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 35 Wait, the prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image... use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". The PDF text has a list of symbols like "" (check) and "+". And numbers. If I ignore the numbers, am I failing "Extract all of the text"? The prompt has a specific override: "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text". The numbers 1-11 are labels. They point to specific parts of the drawing. Without the drawing, "1" means nothing. So I will follow the override rule. I will not list "1, 2, 3, 4...". One final check on the image description. The image shows root canal shapes. Leftmost: Single root, oval. Second: Single root, oval. Third: Multi-rooted, complex shape. Fourth: Multi-rooted, cross shape. Fifth: Single root, straight. The labels 1-11 point to specific dimensions or features. The checkmarks and plus signs are next to the numbers. I will keep the description simple. One detail: "Use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". The PDF text has: "1 " "2 " "3,4 " "5 + " "6 + " "7 + " "8 + " "9 " "10 " "11 " This confirms the numbers and symbols are present. Since I am treating the whole top part as a figure (or part of it), I will describe it. The prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." Does this apply to the *whole slide* or just the *diagram*? "if the figure is an image only with labels..." The diagram is an image with labels. So I describe the diagram. The slide also has text "Calcium Hydroxide" and "G. Heithersay...". This is not "sparse text" belonging to the figure. It's a caption/title. So I will include the title and citation, then the image tag for the diagram. Actually, looking at the layout, the diagram *is* the main content. I will format it as: **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 This seems the most compliant. Let's double check the bottom slide text extraction. "Ca(OH)2 is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world" -> Cyan text. Bold. "Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity" -> White text. Regular bullet. "Other very useful properties:" -> White text. Regular bullet. "Stimulates hard tissue formation" -> Green text. Bold. "Helps dissolve necrotic tissue" -> Green text. Bold. "Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS)" -> Green text. Bold. References -> Yellow text. Bold. The indentation in the PDF text suggests: - Ca(OH)2... - Mainly... - Other... - Stimulates... - Helps... - Detoxifies... - References... I will replicate this indentation with markdown lists. Final Plan: 1. Header info. 2. Slide 1 Title and Citation. 3. Image description tag for the diagram. 4. Slide 2 Title. 5. Slide 2 Content with bolding for colored text. 6. Footer info. One detail: "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." Does this mean I should NOT return the title "Calcium Hydroxide" for the top slide? "if the figure is an image only..." -> The *figure* (the diagram) is an image with labels. The *slide* contains the figure and some text. I think it's safer to include the slide text (Title, Citation) and then describe the figure. The instruction likely refers to pages that are just images (like a pure scan of a diagram). Here we have a slide. Wait, looking at the provided text block in the prompt "PDF Text: ... 1 check 2 check ...". The user provided the PDF text. The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". This implies I should try to get the text *from the image*. If the top slide is considered a "figure with labels", I shouldn't transcribe the labels. If I don't transcribe the labels, I am ignoring the numbers 1-11. This aligns with "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... do not return the text". So yes, ignore 1-11. One tiny thing: "G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975". In the image, it's "G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975". In the PDF text, it's "G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975". Matches. Okay, ready to write. I will use ` Actually, the prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure". This implies I should *only* return the description if it's *only* an image with labels. The top slide has text "Calcium Hydroxide" and the citation. This is not *only* an image with labels. It has text context. So I will return the text. The instruction "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... do not return the text" applies to the *labels* (1-11). So I return the Title and Citation, but NOT the labels 1-11. And I describe the figure in ` tags." So: **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 This seems the most logical interpretation. Wait, is the top part a "figure" or a "slide"? It's a slide. The bottom part is a "slide". The prompt asks to "Extract all of the text from this image". The image provided is a PDF page with two slides. I will transcribe the whole page content, handling the top diagram as an image element. One final check on colors. Top slide title: Yellow. Bottom slide title: Yellow. Bottom slide first bullet: Cyan. Bottom slide sub-bullets (properties): Green. Bottom slide references: Yellow. I will bold all of these. Let's go. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO --- **Calcium Hydroxide** G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975 --- **Calcium Hydroxide** **Ca(OH)2 is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world** * Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity * Other very useful properties: * **Stimulates hard tissue formation** * **Helps dissolve necrotic tissue** * **Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS)** * **Safavi & Nicholls 1993, 1994; Olsen et al 1999, Nelson-Filho et al 2002a, 2002b, Silva et al 2002, Jiang et al 2003, Tanomaru et al 2003** --- 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 35  #### Historical Context and Clinical Significance **G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975** #### Properties of Calcium Hydroxide **Ca(OH)₂ is the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world** - Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity - Other very useful properties: - **Stimulates hard tissue formation** - **Helps dissolve necrotic tissue** - **Detoxifies bacterial endotoxin (LPS)** - **Safavi & Nicholls 1993, 1994; Olsen et al 1999, Nelson-Filho et al 2002a, 2002b, Silva et al 2002, Jiang et al 2003, Tanomaru et al 2003** A diagram illustrating calcium hydroxide in endodontics, citing G. Heithersay J Brit Endod Soc 1975. It displays five tooth root outlines showing various root canal preparations with numbered points (1-11) marked by green checkmarks or yellow plus signs to indicate specific areas or measurements. # Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO --- **Effect of different irrigating solutions and calcium hydroxide on bacterial LPS** Tanomaru et al IEJ 2003; 36: 733-9 * **LPS → inflammation and bone resorption** * Stimulates macrophages to release cytokines * e.g. tumour necrosis factor, interleukins 1, 6, 8 * **LPS was NOT inactivated by biomechanical preparation and irrigation with:** * Saline * Chlorhexidine - 2% * NaOCl - 1%, 2.5%, 5% * **But LPS WAS inactivated by Ca(OH)₂** --- # Calcium Hydroxide * **Probably the most widely-used endodontic medicament throughout the world** * Mainly because of its anti-bacterial activity * **BUT - there are limitations and potential problems with Ca(OH)₂** * Toxicity - initial and long-term * Increased replacement resorption * Increased ankylosis * May promote inflammatory resorption --- 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 36   #### Impact of Irrigants and Calcium Hydroxide on Bacterial LPS Research by Tanomaru et al. (IEJ 2003; 36: 733-9) highlights the relationship between Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and endodontic treatment outcomes: - **LPS Pathogenicity**: LPS triggers inflammation and bone resorption by stimulating macrophages to release various cytokines, including: - Tumour necrosis factor - Interleukins 1, 6, 8 - **Inactivation Efficacy**: LPS was **NOT** inactivated by biomechanical preparation and irrigation using the following solutions: - Saline - Chlorhexidine (2%) - Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) at concentrations of 1%, 2.5%, and 5% - **Calcium Hydroxide Performance**: LPS **WAS** successfully inactivated by the application of Calcium Hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂). #### Clinical Use and Limitations of Calcium Hydroxide Calcium Hydroxide is recognized as the most widely used endodontic medicament globally, primarily due to its anti-bacterial activity. However, clinicians must consider several limitations and potential complications associated with its use: - **Toxicity**: Concerns exist regarding both initial and long-term toxicity. - **Resorption Issues**: - Increased risk of replacement resorption. - Potential to promote inflammatory resorption. - **Ankylosis**: Use may lead to an increased incidence of ankylosis. A presentation slide titled 'Effect of different irrigating solutions and calcium hydroxide on bacterial LPS' referencing Tanomaru et al. It details that LPS causes inflammation and bone resorption via cytokine release, and while not inactivated by saline, chlorhexidine, or NaOCl, it is inactivated by Calcium Hydroxide. A presentation slide titled 'Calcium Hydroxide' describing it as a widely-used endodontic medicament due to anti-bacterial activity. It lists limitations and potential problems including toxicity, increased replacement resorption, ankylosis, and inflammatory resorption. The user wants me to extract text from an image which appears to be a slide from a presentation. The text is about "Anti-Bacterial Strategies" specifically "Endodontic Medicaments". I need to use the provided PDF text as context but prioritize the image text for accuracy. I need to handle formatting: - Colors: Yellow and Cyan text in the image corresponds to specific highlights. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". - Tables: The layout isn't strictly a table, but a list. However, the prompt says "Format tables in HTML". I should look for structured data. The slide has bullet points. I will use Markdown lists. - Flowcharts: None really, just a list of points. - Images: There are small images of dental products (Ledermix, Calasept Plus, Pulpdent). I need to describe these or treat the page as an image if the text relies heavily on them. The prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description... similarly if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... treat the whole page as a figure". - Wait, the text *does* make sense without the images, but the images are examples. - Let's look at the structure. - Header: Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO - Slide 1 Title: Endodontic Medicaments Choices: - Bullet 1: Corticosteroid / antibiotic - CS / Ab. Sub-bullet: e.g. Ledermix paste. (Image of Ledermix next to it). - Bullet 2: Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)2. Sub-bullet: e.g. Calasept Plus paste. (Image of Calasept Plus next to it). - Bullet 3: 50:50 mixture - CS / Ab + Ca(OH)2. Sub-bullets: e.g. Ledermix + Calasept Plus, e.g. Ledermix + Pulpdent. (Image of Pulpdent next to it). - Slide 2 Title: 50:50 mix of Ledermix / Ca(OH)2 - Bullet 1: Slower release of Ledermix paste components. Sub-bullet: Dressing lasts longer... Sub-sub: Maintains canal sterility... - Bullet 2: No change in activity of components. - Bullet 3: Increased anti-bacterial spectrum... - Bullet 4: Only a small reduction in pH levels... - Bullet 5: Lower tissue toxicity. Sub-bullet: Compared with Ca(OH)2. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". In the image: - "Endodontic Medicaments" is yellow -> Bold. - "Choices:" is green -> Bold. - "Corticosteroid / antibiotic - CS / Ab" is white/grey. - "Ledermix paste" is white/grey. - "Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)2" is white/grey. - "Calasept Plus paste" is white/grey. - "50:50 mixture - CS / Ab + Ca(OH)2" is white. - "Ledermix" (in the mix section) is yellow -> Bold. - "Calasept Plus" (in the mix section) is cyan -> Bold. - "Ledermix" (second mix) is yellow -> Bold. - "Pulpdent" is cyan -> Bold. - Slide 2 Title "50:50 mix of Ledermix / Ca(OH)2" is yellow -> Bold. - "Dressing lasts longer..." is cyan -> Bold. - "Maintains canal sterility for longer" is orange -> Bold. - "Compared with Ca(OH)2" is cyan -> Bold. Actually, looking closely at the prompt "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". This is a specific instruction. Let's re-evaluate the colors. - "Endodontic Medicaments" (Yellow) -> Bold - "Choices:" (Green) -> Bold - "50:50 mixture..." (White text, yellow bullet). The text "Ledermix" and "Calasept Plus" inside are colored. "Ledermix" is yellow, "Calasept Plus" is cyan. - Slide 2 title "50:50 mix..." (Yellow) -> Bold. - "Dressing lasts longer..." (Cyan) -> Bold. - "Maintains canal sterility..." (Orange) -> Bold. - "Compared with Ca(OH)2" (Cyan) -> Bold. The prompt says "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". The content is lists, not really tables. I will use Markdown lists. The prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description...". The images on the right are product shots. I should probably mention them or just transcribe the text next to them. The text is the main content. I will ignore the images themselves for transcription unless they contain text labels. The labels are "Ledermix", "Calasept Plus", "Pulpdent". These are in the text. Let's look at the bottom page info: "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 37". I will structure the output as: Header info. Slide 1 content. Slide 2 content. Footer info. Let's refine the "different colour" rule. In the first slide: - "Endodontic Medicaments" is yellow. - "Choices:" is green. - "Ledermix" (under 50:50) is yellow. - "Calasept Plus" (under 50:50) is cyan. - "Ledermix" (under 50:50, 2nd e.g.) is yellow. - "Pulpdent" (under 50:50, 2nd e.g.) is cyan. In the second slide: - "50:50 mix of Ledermix / Ca(OH)2" is yellow. - "Dressing lasts longer..." is cyan. - "Maintains canal sterility for longer" is orange. - "Compared with Ca(OH)2" is cyan. I will apply bolding to these colored texts. The PDF text provided has some errors like "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" vs "Endodontic Medicaments". The image text is the primary source. The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". The PDF text is quite good actually, except for the bullet point symbols which are garbled (, ). I will use standard Markdown bullets (- or *). Let's assemble the text. **Top Header:** Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Slide 1:** **Endodontic Medicaments** **Choices:** * Corticosteroid / antibiotic - CS / Ab * e.g. Ledermix paste * Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)2 * e.g. Calasept Plus paste * 50:50 mixture - CS / Ab + Ca(OH)2 * e.g. **Ledermix** + **Calasept Plus** * e.g. **Ledermix** + **Pulpdent** **Slide 2:** **50:50 mix of Ledermix / Ca(OH)2** * Slower release of Ledermix paste components * **Dressing lasts longer than Ledermix paste used alone** * -> **Maintains canal sterility for longer** * No change in activity of components * Increased anti-bacterial spectrum compared to Ledermix paste used alone * Only a small reduction in pH levels reached in dentine * Lower tissue toxicity * **Compared with Ca(OH)2** **Footer:** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 37 Wait, I need to check the colors again. "Choices:" is green. I will make it bold. "Endodontic Medicaments" is yellow. I will make it bold. "Dressing lasts longer..." is cyan/light blue. I will make it bold. "Maintains canal sterility..." is orange. I will make it bold. "Compared with Ca(OH)2" is cyan/light blue. I will make it bold. The prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold". It doesn't say "only if". It implies if it's a distinct color. The text "Ledermix" in the first slide under "50:50 mixture" is yellow. The text "Calasept Plus" next to it is cyan. The text "Ledermix" below that is yellow. The text "Pulpdent" next to that is cyan. Let's look at the PDF text provided in the prompt to see if it matches. PDF: "Endodontic Medicaments Choices:" PDF: "50:50 mixture - CS / Ab + Ca(OH)2" -> "e.g. Ledermix + Calasept Plus" -> "e.g. Ledermix + Pulpdent" PDF: "50:50 mix of Ledermix / Ca(OH)2" PDF: "Dressing lasts longer than Ledermix paste used alone" PDF: "Maintains canal sterility for longer" PDF: "Compared with Ca(OH)2" Okay, I have the text. I will format it now. The prompt says "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)". There are no tables here. Just lists. "flowcharts as tables as best as possible". No flowcharts. "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." The images on the right (Ledermix tube, Calasept jar, Pulpdent tube) are clearly product photos. They serve as visual aids for the text next to them. The text describes them. I will not treat the whole page as an image because there is substantial text. I will not transcribe the images themselves as text unless there are labels. The labels "Ledermix", "Calasept Plus", "Pulpdent" are in the bullet points. I will structure the response to follow the visual layout as much as possible using Markdown. One detail: "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" is in the top right. "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" is top left. Let's do the transcription. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Endodontic Medicaments** **Choices:** * Corticosteroid / antibiotic - CS / Ab * e.g. Ledermix paste * Calcium hydroxide - Ca(OH)$_2$ * e.g. Calasept Plus paste * 50:50 mixture - CS / Ab + Ca(OH)$_2$ * e.g. **Ledermix** + **Calasept Plus** * e.g. **Ledermix** + **Pulpdent** **50:50 mix of Ledermix / Ca(OH)$_2$** * Slower release of Ledermix paste components * **Dressing lasts longer than Ledermix paste used alone** * $\rightarrow$ **Maintains canal sterility for longer** * No change in activity of components * Increased anti-bacterial spectrum compared to Ledermix paste used alone * Only a small reduction in pH levels reached in dentine * Lower tissue toxicity * **Compared with Ca(OH)$_2$** **2$^{nd}$ Year DMD - 2023** **Page 37** #### Selection of Endodontic Medicaments **Endodontic Medicaments Choices:** - Corticosteroid / antibiotic (CS / Ab) - e.g., Ledermix paste - Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂) - e.g., Calasept Plus paste - 50:50 mixture (CS / Ab + Ca(OH)₂) - e.g., **Ledermix** + **Calasept Plus** - e.g., **Ledermix** + **Pulpdent** #### Properties of the 50:50 Mix of Ledermix / Ca(OH)₂ - Slower release of Ledermix paste components - **Dressing lasts longer than Ledermix paste used alone** - **Maintains canal sterility for longer** - No change in activity of components - Increased anti-bacterial spectrum compared to Ledermix paste used alone - Only a small reduction in pH levels reached in dentine - Lower tissue toxicity - **Compared with Ca(OH)₂** **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** | **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** --- ### Slide 1 **For how long should medicaments be used ?** * **Absolute MINIMUM time:** **2 weeks** * **Since inflammation takes 10-14 days to resolve** * **Most BENEFICIAL** and **MAXIMUM** times: * **Ledermix paste** * **4 → 6 weeks** *(Image of Ledermix paste tubes)* --- ### Slide 2 **Ledermix paste - Diffusion: Abbott et al *EDT* 1988, 1989** | Feature | Description / Value | | :--- | :--- | | **Rate of Release** (Y-Axis) | **Initially: Very rapid release**<br>**Then: Slow, steady release**<br>**Therapeutic amt's up to ~6 weeks** | | **Therapeutic Level** | Dashed horizontal line indicating threshold | | **Time** (X-Axis) | **1 day** → **1 week** → **1 month** → **3 months** | | **Duration** | **6 weeks** (Marked on X-axis) | *(Image of Ledermix paste tubes)* --- **2nd Year DMD - 2023** | **Page 38**  #### Recommended Duration of Use - **Absolute Minimum Time: 2 weeks** - This duration is required as inflammation typically takes 10–14 days to resolve. - **Ledermix Paste (Most Beneficial and Maximum Times):** - 4 to 6 weeks #### Ledermix Paste Diffusion Dynamics Based on research by Abbott et al. (*EDT* 1988, 1989), the release profile of Ledermix paste is characterized by: - **Initial Phase:** Very rapid release of components. - **Maintenance Phase:** Slow, steady release following the initial burst. - **Duration of Efficacy:** Therapeutic amounts remain present for up to approximately 6 weeks. - **Thresholds:** Therapeutic levels are maintained from day 1 through 1 month, tapering off by 6 weeks. A line chart illustrating the diffusion rate of Ledermix paste over time, showing an initial rapid release followed by a slow, steady release that maintains therapeutic levels for up to 6 weeks. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2**      **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** *** **For how long should medicaments be used ?** * Absolute MINIMUM time: **2 weeks** * **Since inflammation takes 10-14 days to resolve** * Most BENEFICAL and MAXIMUM times: * Ledermix paste * **4 → 6 weeks** * **Calcium hydroxide** * **4 weeks → 6 months** *(Image of Calasept tube and syringe)* *** **For how long should medicaments be used ?** *(Graph showing pH changes over time)* * **Y-axis:** pH (0-12) * **X-axis:** days (0, 0.13, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28) * **Legend:** * cervical inner * apical inner * cervical outer * apical outer *(Image of Calasept tube)* <div style="border: 1px solid red; color: white; background-color: black; display: inline-block; padding: 5px;"> **Nerwich et al JoE 1993**<br> **pH changes in root dentine** </div> *** **2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023**      **Page 39**    #### Recommended Duration of Use - **Absolute Minimum Time: 2 weeks** - Required for the resolution of inflammation (10–14 days). - **Most Beneficial and Maximum Times:** - **Ledermix paste:** 4 to 6 weeks - **Calcium hydroxide:** 4 weeks to 6 months #### pH Changes in Root Dentine Research by Nerwich et al. (*JoE* 1993) regarding pH changes over a 28-day period indicates variations based on location and depth: - **Measurement Areas:** - Cervical inner dentine - Apical inner dentine - Cervical outer dentine - Apical outer dentine - **Observations:** The medicament influences the pH levels across these zones over the course of 0.13 to 28 days, showing the time-dependent diffusion of calcium hydroxide through the root structure. A photo showing a tube of Calasept paste and a syringe, positioned next to text discussing the usage time for medicaments like Ledermix paste and Calcium hydroxide. A line graph titled 'pH changes in root dentine' from Nerwich et al (JoE 1993), showing pH levels over 28 days for cervical and apical inner/outer regions. A photo of a Calasept tube labeled 'SCANIA DENTAL AB', placed to the right of the pH change graph. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **For how long should medicaments be used ?** * Absolute MINIMUM time: **2 weeks** * **Since inflammation takes 10-14 days to resolve** * Most BENEFICAL and MAXIMUM times: * Ledermix paste * **4 → 6 weeks** * Calcium hydroxide * **4 weeks → 6 months** * **50:50 Cs-Ab / Ca(OH)₂ mixtures** * **4 weeks → 3 months** 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 40  #### Recommended Duration of Use - **Absolute Minimum Time: 2 weeks** - Necessary for inflammation to resolve (10–14 days). - **Most Beneficial and Maximum Times:** - **Ledermix paste:** 4 to 6 weeks - **Calcium hydroxide:** 4 weeks to 6 months - **50:50 Corticosteroid-Antibiotic (Cs-Ab) / Ca(OH)₂ mixtures:** 4 weeks to 3 months A line graph titled 'Average pH values' plotting pH levels against time (days) for different medicaments including Pulpdent, DT Temporary Dressing, and Ca(OH)2 powder, alongside controls, based on Plataniotis & Abbott 1998 data regarding pH changes in root dentine. The user wants me to extract text from the provided image, which appears to be a slide from a presentation. **Image Analysis:** 1. **Header:** "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" and "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO". 2. **First Slide (Top):** * Blue background box. * Title box: "Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - Aust Endo J 2018" (Cyan text) and "pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes" (Yellow text). * Graph: Line chart showing pH changes over time (1 Day to 364 days). * Y-axis: pH (7 to 10.5). * X-axis: Time (1 Day, 5 Days, 14 days, 28 days, 56 days, 84 days, 140 days, 196 days, 252 days, 308 day, 364 days). * Legend: Pulpdent Outer, Pulpdent Inner, 50:50 Outer, 50:50 Inner, Ledermix Outer, Ledermix Inner, Control Outer, Control Inner. * Image: Small photo of paste tubes. * Arrows: Two red arrows pointing down at 28 days and 84 days. 3. **Second Slide (Bottom):** * Blue background box. * Title box: "Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - Materials 2018" (Cyan text) and "pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste" (Green text). * Graph: Line chart showing pH changes over time (1 Day to 84 days). * Y-axis: pH (7 to 10). * X-axis: Time (1 Day, 2 Days, 5 days, 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days, 56 days, 70 days, 84 days). * Legend: Led/Cal - Inner, Led/Cal - Outer, Led/PD - Inner, Led/PD - Outer. * Images: Photos of Calasept Plus, Ledermix tubes, Pulpdent paste tubes. * Arrows: Two red arrows pointing down at 28 days and 84 days. 4. **Footer:** "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 41". **Extraction Strategy:** * I will transcribe the header text. * I will transcribe the main content of the first slide, treating the graph data as a description or list since it's not a structured table in the traditional sense, but the prompt asks for tables if applicable. The graph has a legend which acts like a key. I will format the text blocks clearly. * I will transcribe the main content of the second slide similarly. * I will use bolding for colored text as requested (Cyan/Green/Yellow titles). * I will ignore the OCR text in the "PDF Text" section provided in the prompt because it's just raw extracted text fragments (coordinates, axis labels repeated) and the prompt says "Prioritize image text but use PDF text for context to enhance the ocr , try to match the text formatting as much as possible, if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold. Note that erros may occur with the pdf text, if it is obviously corrupted or error ridden text then ignore it !" The provided OCR is very fragmented. I will rely on visual inspection. **Drafting the content:** **Header:** **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO **Slide 1:** **Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - Aust Endo J 2018** **pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes** [Graph details] Y-axis: pH X-axis: Time Legend: - Pulpdent Outer - Pulpdent Inner - 50:50 Outer - 50:50 Inner - Ledermix Outer - Ledermix Inner - Control Outer - Control Inner **Slide 2:** **Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - Materials 2018** **pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste** [Graph details] Y-axis: pH X-axis: Time Legend: - Led/Cal - Inner - Led/Cal - Outer - Led/PD - Inner - Led/PD - Outer **Footer:** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 41 **Refining formatting:** The prompt asks to format tables as HTML. The graph legends can be presented as lists. The prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." Wait, the graphs contain a lot of data (lines, labels). It's not *just* an image with sparse text. It's a data visualization. However, transcribing every data point of a line graph is impossible and not useful as "text". The prompt says: "Extract all of the text from this image... Format tables in HTML... if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description... similarly if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure." Let's look at the specific instruction: "Extract all of the text from this image... Note that erros may occur with the pdf text, if it is obviously corrupted or error ridden text then ignore it !" The graphs have axes labels and a legend. These are text. I should extract the legend and axis labels. The prompt says "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... then do not return the text". This is tricky. The axis labels (pH, Time) are specific to the figure. However, usually, for slides like this, users want the titles and the legends/transcription of what is being compared. Let's look at the first slide. It's a study on pH changes. I will extract the titles, the citation, and the legend items. I will describe the graphs briefly if needed, but the text elements are the titles and legends. Actually, looking at the bottom slide, the title is "pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste". I will structure the response to list the titles and the legends. I will not try to turn the graph lines into a markdown table because the data points aren't explicitly listed, just plotted. I will list the legend items. Let's re-read: "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible If the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." The graphs are complex. They are not "sparse text". They are data plots. Maybe I should just transcribe the text headers and legends. The text "Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - Aust Endo J 2018" is a citation. "pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes" is a subtitle. The legend lists the groups. I will treat the text parts as standard text and the graph parts as... well, I can't convert the visual graph into text easily without a data table. I will list the legend. Let's look at the instruction again: "Extract all of the text from this image...". Okay, I will extract the visible text. Header: Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2, W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO Top Box: **Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - Aust Endo J 2018** **pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes** Legend: Pulpdent Outer Pulpdent Inner 50:50 Outer 50:50 Inner Ledermix Outer Ledermix Inner Control Outer Control Inner Image of paste. Bottom Box: **Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - Materials 2018** **pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste** Legend: Led/Cal - Inner Led/Cal - Outer Led/PD - Inner Led/PD - Outer Images of pastes. Footer: **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 41 Wait, the prompt says "Format tables in HTML". The legend *could* be a table. But it's a list. The prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure". The graphs have a lot of text (axis labels, legend). They are not "sparse". However, converting the *entire* graph content (lines) into text is impossible. I will extract the titles, citations, and legends. I will format the legends as lists or tables if appropriate. Since it's a list of series, a list is fine. Actually, the prompt says "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)". This usually applies if I extract a table. There are no explicit tables here. I will just use Markdown for the text. Let's look at the "PDF Text" provided in the prompt. It contains coordinate garbage like "7 7.5 8...". I should ignore that as per instructions ("if it is obviously corrupted or error ridden text then ignore it"). So, the plan: 1. Header text. 2. Top slide title/citation (colored text -> bold). 3. Top slide subtitle (colored text -> bold). 4. Top slide legend. 5. Bottom slide title/citation (colored text -> bold). 6. Bottom slide subtitle (colored text -> bold). 7. Bottom slide legend. 8. Footer text. I will treat the graph images themselves as not needing transcription of the lines, but I will mention the axes if relevant to the context, or just stick to the static text elements. Actually, the prompt says "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... then do not return the text". The axis labels "pH" and "Time" only make sense in the context of the figure. The legend items "Pulpdent Outer" etc. make sense as categories. The titles make sense on their own. I will extract the titles and legends. I will skip the axis labels and tick labels (1 Day, 5 Days...) because they are part of the figure's internal logic and likely fall under "text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure". Wait, "extract ALL of the text". That's the primary instruction. The caveat about "if the text... only makes sense in the context" is a filter. Axis labels *do* make sense in context. So I will skip axis labels. I will include the legend because it defines the lines. Let's refine the "colored text -> bold" instruction. "Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - Aust Endo J 2018" is cyan. I will bold it. "pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes" is yellow. I will bold it. "Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - Materials 2018" is cyan. I will bold it. "pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste" is green. I will bold it. Final check on the "tables" instruction. "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)". I don't see any HTML tables in the source. The legends are just lists next to a box. I will just use standard Markdown lists. One distinct feature: The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". The PDF text provided has: "Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - Aust Endo J 2018" "pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes" "Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - Materials 2018" "pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste" This matches my visual analysis. I will structure the output to clearly separate the two slides. **Slide 1 Content:** - **Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - *Aust Endo J* 2018** - **pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes** - Legend items. **Slide 2 Content:** - **Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - *Materials* 2018** - **pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste** - Legend items. I will assume the colors in the prompt instructions (Cyan, Yellow, Green) correspond to bolding. "Cai, Castro Salgado..." is Cyan -> **Bold** "pH Changes..." is Yellow -> **Bold** "Cai, Abbott..." is Cyan -> **Bold** "pH Changes..." is Green -> **Bold** The legend text is black in the image. The footer is black. Let's write it out. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO --- **Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - *Aust Endo J* 2018** **pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes** * Pulpdent Outer * Pulpdent Inner * 50:50 Outer * 50:50 Inner * Ledermix Outer * Ledermix Inner * Control Outer * Control Inner *(Graph showing pH changes over time from 1 Day to 364 days)* --- **Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - *Materials* 2018** **pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste** * Led/Cal - Inner * Led/Cal - Outer * Led/PD - Inner * Led/PD - Outer *(Graph showing pH changes over time from 1 Day to 84 days)* --- **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 41   #### Research on pH Changes in Root Dentine **Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - Aust Endo J 2018** **pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes** This study tracks pH levels in root dentine over a 364-day period (1 year) comparing various medicament combinations. The data points include measurements at 1, 5, 14, 28, 56, 84, 140, 196, 252, 308, and 364 days. - **Pulpdent Outer** - **Pulpdent Inner** - **50:50 Outer** - **50:50 Inner** - **Ledermix Outer** - **Ledermix Inner** - **Control Outer** - **Control Inner** #### Comparison of Ledermix Combinations **Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - Materials 2018** **pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste** This study evaluates the pH changes over an 84-day period specifically comparing Ledermix mixed with different calcium hydroxide pastes (Calasept Plus vs. Pulpdent). - **Led/Cal - Inner** (Ledermix and Calasept Plus mixture) - **Led/Cal - Outer** - **Led/PD - Inner** (Ledermix and Pulpdent mixture) - **Led/PD - Outer** #### Clinical Observations - Significant pH changes are monitored at critical intervals, specifically highlighted at the 28-day and 84-day marks. - The mixtures aim to balance the anti-inflammatory properties of Ledermix with the high pH (alkalinity) of calcium hydroxide pastes for long-term disinfection. A line chart titled 'pH Changes in root dentine - 50:50 Ledermix and Pulpdent pastes' from 'Cai, Castro Salgado & Abbott - Aust Endo J 2018'. It displays pH levels (y-axis, 7-10.5) over time (x-axis, 1 Day to 364 days) for various paste groups: Pulpdent Outer/Inner, 50:50 Outer/Inner, Ledermix Outer/Inner, and Control Outer/Inner. Red arrows indicate time points at 28 days and 84 days. A line chart titled 'pH Changes - Ledermix with Calasept Plus or Pulpdent paste' from 'Cai, Abbott & Castro Salgado - Materials 2018'. It shows pH levels (y-axis, 7-10) over time (x-axis, 1 Day to 84 days) comparing 'Led/Cal - Inner/Outer' and 'Led/PD - Inner/Outer'. Red arrows indicate time points at 28 days and 84 days. # Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Application of Medicaments** * **Spiral filler** * ✓ Preferred: most effective & easiest method * ✓ **ONLY if the canal has been enlarged** * **Hand file** * ✓ If canal has **NOT** been enlarged / prepared * **NOT advised:** * ✗ Injection - No control; over-extension likely * ✗ Paper point - break down; periapical irritant *(Image of dental syringe and files)* *** **Application of Medicaments** * **50:50 mix of CS / Ab & Ca(OH)₂** * Saline-based Ca(OH)₂ - e.g. Calasept Plus * Pre-mix on a glass slab * Then apply the mixture with a file or spiral filler * Methyl cellulose based Ca(OH)₂ - e.g. Pulpdent * Place the CS / Ab in the canal first (with file or spiral filler) * Then place the Ca(OH)₂ in canal - i.e. mix in the canal (with file or spiral filler) * Ca(OH)₂ powder * Pre-mix on a glass slab * Then apply with file or spiral filler *(Image of dental syringe and files)* **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 42**   #### Application of Medicaments - **Spiral filler** - Preferred: most effective and easiest method - **ONLY** if the canal has been enlarged - **Hand file** - Use if the canal has **NOT** been enlarged or prepared - **Techniques NOT advised:** - Injection: Lacks control; over-extension is likely - Paper point: Can break down; acts as a periapical irritant #### Mixing and Application Protocols - **50:50 mix of Cortisomol (CS) / Antibiotic (Ab) and Ca(OH)₂** - **Saline-based Ca(OH)₂ (e.g., Calasept Plus):** - Pre-mix on a glass slab - Apply the mixture with a file or spiral filler - **Methyl cellulose based Ca(OH)₂ (e.g., Pulpdent):** - Place the CS / Ab in the canal first (using a file or spiral filler) - Place the Ca(OH)₂ in the canal and mix in situ (using a file or spiral filler) - **Ca(OH)₂ powder:** - Pre-mix on a glass slab - Apply with a file or spiral filler A photograph of dental equipment, specifically a syringe labeled "CALA" and several dental files or spiral fillers laid out on a blue surface, positioned in the top right corner of the first slide to illustrate tools for applying medicaments. A similar photograph of a dental syringe and files positioned in the top right corner of the second slide, serving as a visual aid for the section discussing the 50:50 mix of CS/Ab and Ca(OH)2 and other medicament application methods. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO | **Typical Treatment Approach** | | | :--- | :--- | | **First Appointment** | | | Consult: history, exam, radiographs, clinical tests | | | $\blacktriangleright$ **Diagnosis - tooth, pulp/canal + periapical conditions** | | | $\blacktriangleright$ **Identify the cause(s)** | | | Discussion, recommendations re: management options | | | L.A. and rubber dam (use cuff technique) | | | Remove ALL previous restorations | | | Remove ALL caries and cracked portions of teeth | | | Assess feasibility of endodontics and a new restoration | | | **First Appointment (continued)** | | | :--- | :--- | | Access to the pulp chamber | | | $\blacktriangleright$ **Pulpitis - pulpotomy or pulpectomy** | | | $\blacktriangleright$ **Infected canals - remove debris or existing RCF** | | | Locate, negotiate & irrigate **(EDTAC)** all root canals | | | Root canal medication - **depends on the diagnosis:** | | | $\blacktriangleright$ **Pulpitis - Ledermix paste** | | | $\blacktriangleright$ **Infected canal - 50:50 mix Ledermix + Ca(OH)$_2$** | | | Close the pulp chamber - **CW + Cavit** | | | Interim restoration of tooth - usually **GIC + band** | | | Check and relieve tooth from all occlusal contacts | | | Post-operative instructions and discussion | | 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 43 #### First Appointment: Clinical Assessment and Initial Management 1. **Consultation and Diagnostics** - Review history, examination, radiographs, and clinical tests - Establish diagnosis for the tooth, pulp/canal, and periapical conditions - Identify the cause(s) - Discuss management options and recommendations 2. **Preparation** - Administer local anaesthetic (L.A.) and apply rubber dam (using cuff technique) - Remove all previous restorations - Remove all caries and cracked portions of the tooth - Assess feasibility of endodontic treatment and a new restoration 3. **Endodontic Access and Initial Treatment** - Access the pulp chamber - **Pulpitis:** Perform pulpotomy or pulpectomy - **Infected canals:** Remove debris or existing root canal filling (RCF) - Locate, negotiate, and irrigate all root canals using **EDTAC** 4. **Medication and Temporary Closure** - Root canal medication (dependent on diagnosis): - **Pulpitis:** Ledermix paste - **Infected canal:** 50:50 mix of Ledermix + Ca(OH)₂ - Close the pulp chamber using Cotton Wool (**CW**) and **Cavit** - Interim restoration of the tooth (usually **GIC + band**) - Check and relieve the tooth from all occlusal contacts - Provide post-operative instructions **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 44** --- ### **Second Appointment - 4 weeks later** - Check the tooth and surrounding tissues - L.A. and rubber dam (usually cuff technique) - Access cavity - through the interim restoration - Negotiate canals to estimated lengths - Establish "working lengths" - with radiograph(s) - Chemo-mechanically prepare the canals - **Irrigate - 15% EDTAC + 1% NaOCl + 15% EDTAC** - Medication - depends on original diagnosis: - **Pulpitis - 50:50 mix Ledermix + Ca(OH)₂** - **Infected canal - Ca(OH)₂ alone** - Close the access cavity - **CW**, **Cavit** and **IRM** --- ### **Third Appointment - 4 weeks (min.) later** - L.A. is *NOT* required - Sensitivity should alert the operator to a problem that requires correction before RCF completed - e.g: - **Over-extension; Perforation; Pulp tissue left in canal; Insuff. irrigation - forcing medicament into P-ap. tissues** - Rubber dam (cuff technique) and access cavity - Irrigate (**EDTAC**) + use smaller file than master file - Root canal filling - **GP** + **AH 26** - Close the access cavity - **CW**, **Cavit** + **IRM** - Final radiograph - Arrange final restoration and review appointments #### Second Appointment: 4 Weeks Later 1. **Review and Preparation** - Check the tooth and surrounding tissues - Administer L.A. and apply rubber dam (usually cuff technique) - Access cavity through the interim restoration 2. **Canal Preparation** - Negotiate canals to estimated lengths - Establish working lengths with radiographs - Chemo-mechanically prepare the canals - **Irrigation Protocol:** 15% EDTAC + 1% NaOCl + 15% EDTAC 3. **Medication and Closure** - Medication (dependent on original diagnosis): - **Pulpitis:** 50:50 mix of Ledermix + Ca(OH)₂ - **Infected canal:** Ca(OH)₂ alone - Close the access cavity using **CW**, **Cavit**, and **IRM** #### Third Appointment: Minimum 4 Weeks Later 1. **Assessment** - L.A. is **NOT** required. Sensitivity should alert the operator to problems requiring correction before RCF, such as: - Over-extension or perforation - Residual pulp tissue in the canal - Insufficient irrigation forcing medicament into periapical tissues 2. **Final Preparation and Filling** - Apply rubber dam (cuff technique) and access cavity - Irrigate with **EDTAC** and use a file smaller than the master file - Root canal filling (RCF) using **GP** + **AH 26** 3. **Completion** - Close the access cavity using **CW**, **Cavit**, and **IRM** - Take final radiograph - Arrange final restoration and review appointments Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO 2<sup>nd</sup> Year DMD - 2023 Page 45   A composite figure titled 'Some case examples...' displaying four sequential dental radiographs. The images track a case from 'Pre-operative' through 'RCF - 3 mths', '6 mths - Review', and finally '11 yrs - Review', demonstrating long-term healing. A composite figure showing three sequential dental radiographs illustrating a treatment case. The timeline includes 'Pre-operative', 'RCF - 3 mths', and '6 mths - Review' stages, highlighting changes in root canal treatment and periapical status. The user wants me to extract text from the provided image. The image contains: 1. **Header:** "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" and "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" 2. **Top Figure:** A sequence of dental X-rays showing treatment progress. * Labels: "Pre-op", "2 yrs - Review", "RCF - 3 mths", "6 mths - Review". 3. **Bottom Figure:** Another sequence of dental X-rays. * Labels: "Pre-operative", "WL", "RCF - 18 mths", "4 yrs - Review". 4. **Footer:** "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 46". The request asks to prioritize image text but use PDF text for context. It also asks to format tables in HTML and flowcharts as tables. The text also mentions specific formatting for colors (bold). Let's break down the text extraction. **Header:** * "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" (Left) * "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" (Right) **Top Figure Text:** * "Pre-op" (Yellow text on black background inside a red box) -> Actually, it looks like yellow text with a red outline or red background. Wait, looking closely at crop 1, "Pre-op" is yellow text with a black outline, inside a red box. * "2 yrs - Review" (Yellow text with black outline, red box) * "RCF - 3 mths" (Yellow text with black outline, red box) * "6 mths - Review" (Yellow text with black outline, red box) **Bottom Figure Text:** * "Pre-operative" (Yellow text with black outline, red box) * "WL" (Yellow text with black outline, red box) * "RCF - 18 mths" (Yellow text with black outline, red box) * "4 yrs - Review" (Yellow text with black outline, red box) **Footer:** * "2nd Year DMD - 2023" * "Page 46" The prompt says: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." The text in the boxes is yellow. I will treat this as bold to distinguish it. The prompt says: "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". The images are flowcharts of sorts (sequence of events). I should probably represent the layout using a table structure or just list the text if it's sparse. Wait, the prompt also says: "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." This is a tricky instruction. "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" is a title. The rest are figures with labels. The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image...". Then it says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure...". However, the top part of the prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image...". Let's look at the specific instruction: "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure or image (i.e. its a label or name, wiht no other context then do not return the text, instead treat the whole page as a figure". This suggests I shouldn't just list the labels "Pre-op", "2 yrs - Review" as a list. I should treat the whole page as a figure? No, that instruction applies "if the text on the page *only* makes sense in the context...". Here, the text "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" and "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" and "2nd Year DMD - 2023" are distinct context. So I will extract the main headers and footers. For the figures, since they are X-rays with labels, and the prompt says "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description... wrap this figure in tags", I should probably just describe the figures. BUT, the prompt *also* says "Extract all of the text from this image...". Let's re-read carefully: "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr , try to match the text formatting as much as possible... Format tables in HTML... and flowcharts as tables as best as possible... If the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure...". This is a conflict. "Extract all text" vs "If figure is sparse text, don't return text". Let's look at the content. It's educational material. The text "Pre-op", "2 yrs - Review" etc. are labels. The prompt says "Note that erros may occur with the pdf text, if it is obviously corrupted or error ridden text then ignore it !". The OCR text provided in the prompt is: "PDF Text: Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO Page 46 2nd Year DMD - 2023 2 yrs - Review Pre-op RCF - 3 mths 6 mths - Review Pre-operative RCF - 18 mths 4 yrs - Review WL" Okay, so the PDF text *is* the list of labels. The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image...". And then "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure". This implies I should not output a giant list of labels if they are just labels on a figure. However, the first sentence is "Extract all of the text from this image". Let's look at the structure. Top Header: Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 ... W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO Bottom Header/Footer: 2nd Year DMD - 2023 ... Page 46 Then the figures. The prompt says "Format tables in HTML... and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". The sequence of X-rays looks like a flowchart. Maybe I should represent the flowchart using a table? "Pre-op" -> "RCF - 3 mths" -> "6 mths - Review" -> "2 yrs - Review". This is a sequence. The bottom one: "Pre-operative" -> "WL" -> "RCF - 18 mths" -> "4 yrs - Review". This is also a sequence. Let's try to interpret "Extract all of the text" as the primary goal, but the conditional instruction about figures overrides it for *pure* figure labels. But here, the text *is* the content of the slide. The slide is teaching a point. The text is the content. So I will extract the text. The instruction "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... then do not return the text" is key. Are "Pre-op" and "2 yrs - Review" making sense without context? Yes, they are standard dental terms. But they are clearly labels for the images. Let's look at the instruction again: "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." This seems to suggest if the *entire* page was just a picture with a label, I'd describe it. But the page has a title, footer, and distinct sections. Actually, looking at the provided OCR, it lists "2 yrs - Review", "Pre-op", etc. I think the safest bet is to transcribe the text, formatting the yellow/red boxed text as bold (as per "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold"). And I will structure the layout somewhat to reflect the page. Let's refine the "flowcharts as tables" part. The top image shows a sequence. Image 1 (Top Left): Pre-op Image 2 (Middle Left): RCF - 3 mths Image 3 (Middle Right): 6 mths - Review Image 4 (Top Right): 2 yrs - Review Arrows connect them. Bottom image: Image 1 (Top Left): Pre-operative Image 2 (Top Right): WL Image 3 (Bottom Left): RCF - 18 mths Image 4 (Bottom Right): 4 yrs - Review I can try to represent this flow in a table or just list the text clearly. Given the instruction "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible", I should probably try to make a table for the flowcharts. But wait, "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure...". This is a strong constraint. The page *is* a slide. It contains figures. If I treat the whole thing as a "page with figures", I should extract the text. The instruction "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... then do not return the text" applies to labels like "A" or "B" or specific patient IDs. "Pre-op" is a standard term. Let's assume the user wants the text transcribed. Let's look at the colors. "Pre-op" is yellow text. "2 yrs - Review" is yellow text. "RCF - 3 mths" is yellow text. "6 mths - Review" is yellow text. "Pre-operative" is yellow text. "WL" is yellow text. "RCF - 18 mths" is yellow text. "4 yrs - Review" is yellow text. The headers "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" and "W/Prof..." are black. The footer "2nd Year DMD - 2023" and "Page 46" are black. So, I will format the yellow text as bold. Structure: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** [Figure 1 Description/Content] The top figure shows a progression of dental X-rays. Labels: **Pre-op**, **RCF - 3 mths**, **6 mths - Review**, **2 yrs - Review** [Figure 2 Description/Content] The bottom figure shows another progression. Labels: **Pre-operative**, **WL**, **RCF - 18 mths**, **4 yrs - Review** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 46** Wait, the instruction says "Format tables in HTML... and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". The images *are* flowcharts of treatment stages. Maybe I should create a table that represents the timeline? Top timeline: Pre-op -> RCF - 3 mths -> 6 mths - Review -> 2 yrs - Review Bottom timeline: Pre-operative -> WL -> RCF - 18 mths -> 4 yrs - Review This seems like a good interpretation of "flowcharts as tables". Let's try to map the visual flow to a table. Top flow: Left Col: Pre-op (top), RCF - 3 mths (bottom) -> Arrow to right -> Middle/Right Col: (implicit 6 mths), 6 mths - Review (bottom) -> Arrow up -> Top Right: 2 yrs - Review. Actually, the arrows go: Pre-op (top left) -> down/right -> RCF - 3 mths (bottom left) -> right -> 6 mths - Review (bottom right) -> up/right -> 2 yrs - Review (top right). This is a U-shape path. Bottom flow: Pre-operative (top left) -> right -> WL (top right) -> down/left -> RCF - 18 mths (bottom left) -> right -> 4 yrs - Review (bottom right). This is a Z-shape path. If I follow the instruction "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags", then I shouldn't list the text at all? "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... then do not return the text". "Pre-op" makes sense in context. But "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" does not depend on the figure. So I will return the header and footer text. For the figures, since they are essentially images with labels, and the prompt asks to treat such pages/figures as images if the text is just labels... BUT, the prompt *also* says "Extract all of the text from this image". This is a contradiction. Usually, "Extract all text" is the primary directive. The condition "if the figure is an image only..." is a fallback for when there's *only* a figure. Here, there are headers and footers. Also, the provided OCR text *includes* the labels. This suggests the ground truth expects the labels to be extracted. The instruction "if the text on the page only makes sense in the context of the figure... then do not return the text" might be referring to things like "Tooth 16" or specific annotations that are useless without the image. "Pre-op" is a standard stage. So I will extract the text. Let's look at the "Format tables in HTML... flowcharts as tables" part again. Maybe I should represent the sequence of images as a table? Row 1: Pre-op | 2 yrs - Review Row 2: RCF - 3 mths | 6 mths - Review This doesn't capture the flow well. Let's stick to a linear transcription of the text elements, grouping them by visual location. **Header:** **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** **Body Content:** The image displays dental radiographs illustrating treatment timelines. *Timeline 1:* - **Pre-op** - **RCF - 3 mths** - **6 mths - Review** - **2 yrs - Review** *Timeline 2:* - **Pre-operative** - **WL** - **RCF - 18 mths** - **4 yrs - Review** **Footer:** **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 46** Wait, the prompt says "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." The text in the red boxes is yellow. The rest is black. So "Pre-op", "2 yrs - Review", etc. should be bold. The headers "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" are black. The footer "2nd Year DMD - 2023" is black. Let's look at the OCR provided in the prompt again. It lists: 2 yrs - Review Pre-op RCF - 3 mths 6 mths - Review Pre-operative RCF - 18 mths 4 yrs - Review WL It seems the OCR tool picked up the labels. The prompt says "Extract all of the text from this image, use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". So I should definitely include these labels. How to format? "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". The images *are* flowcharts. So I should probably turn the sequence into a table. Top sequence: | Pre-op | | | --- | --- | | RCF - 3 mths | 6 mths - Review | | | 2 yrs - Review | This is getting complicated to represent the arrows. Maybe I should just list the text as it appears, but bold the colored parts. The instruction "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure" is the most confusing part. If I interpret "this page" as the whole image, and the text on the page (the labels) only makes sense in the context of the figure... Well, "Pre-op" makes sense on its own. "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" makes sense on its own. So I will extract the text. Let's try to combine the "flowchart as table" instruction with the text extraction. I can create a table that mimics the layout. Top part: | Pre-op | | | :--- | :--- | | RCF - 3 mths | 6 mths - Review | | | 2 yrs - Review | This doesn't work well for "2 yrs - Review" which is top right. Let's look at the visual layout again. Top block: [Pre-op] ----------------> [2 yrs - Review] | ^ v | [RCF - 3 mths] -> [6 mths - Review] Bottom block: [Pre-operative] -> [WL] v | [RCF - 18 mths] -> [4 yrs - Review] Wait, the arrows in the bottom block: Pre-operative (top left) -> right -> WL (top right). WL (top right) -> down/left -> RCF - 18 mths (bottom left). RCF - 18 mths (bottom left) -> right -> 4 yrs - Review (bottom right). So it's a Z-shape. I think the best approach is to transcribe the text clearly, using bold for the yellow labels, and maybe structure it to show the grouping. The instruction "Format tables in HTML... flowcharts as tables" might be a generic instruction. If I can't make a good table, I shouldn't force it. However, "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure...". This is a specific override. Does the text "Pre-op" only make sense in the context? Yes, it's a label for the X-ray. Does "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" only make sense? No. So I will return the Header and Footer. For the figures, I will treat them as images. "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." This implies I should NOT list "Pre-op", "2 yrs - Review" etc. if they are just labels on a figure. BUT, the prompt *also* says "Extract all of the text from this image". And the PDF text provided *is* the labels. This suggests the labels *should* be extracted. Perhaps the "sparse text" rule applies if the *entire page* is just a picture with a label like "Figure 1". Here, the text is the content of the slide (the stages of treatment). So I will extract the text. Let's look at the bolding rule: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." The labels are yellow. So they should be bold. The headers/footers are black. So regular text. Let's try to format the flowcharts as tables. Top Flowchart Table: | | | |---|---| | **Pre-op** | | | **RCF - 3 mths** | **6 mths - Review** | | | **2 yrs - Review** | This is messy. Let's just list the text blocks. Block 1 (Header): **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** | **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** Block 2 (Top Figure Labels): **Pre-op** **2 yrs - Review** **RCF - 3 mths** **6 mths - Review** Block 3 (Bottom Figure Labels): **Pre-operative** **WL** **RCF - 18 mths** **4 yrs - Review** Block 4 (Footer): **2nd Year DMD - 2023** **Page 46** Wait, looking at the very bottom left, there is a blue graph bar. Bottom right, a blue graph bar. These are decorations. I will ignore them as they are not text. Let's refine the "flowchart as table" idea. The prompt says "flowcharts as tables as best as possible". I can create a table that represents the sequence. Top sequence: | Stage 1 | Stage 4 | |---|---| | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Where Stage 1 is Pre-op, Stage 2 is RCF - 3 mths, Stage 3 is 6 mths - Review, Stage 4 is 2 yrs - Review. Actually, the arrow goes Pre-op -> RCF -> 6mths -> 2yrs. So a single column table might work better? | **Pre-op** | | **RCF - 3 mths** | | **6 mths - Review** | | **2 yrs - Review** | This loses the spatial arrangement (Pre-op is top left, 2yrs is top right). Let's look at the instruction again. "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!) and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". This suggests I *should* try to make a table if it's a flowchart. Top Figure: | **Pre-op** | | | | **2 yrs - Review** | | **RCF - 3 mths** | **6 mths - Review** | This captures the positions somewhat. Bottom Figure: | **Pre-operative** | **WL** | | **RCF - 18 mths** | **4 yrs - Review** | This captures the Z-shape well (Left-Top, Right-Top, Left-Bottom, Right-Bottom). I think I will provide the text transcription in a clean list, but maybe group the figure labels. Actually, the prompt says "Extract all of the text...". And "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description...". This is the deciding factor. Are the labels "Pre-op", "2 yrs - Review" considered "text on the page [that] only makes sense in the context of the figure"? Yes, they are labels for the X-rays. So, strictly following that rule, I should *not* return "Pre-op", etc. Instead, I should return a description like "". BUT, the prompt *also* says "Extract all of the text from this image... use the pdf text for context". The PDF text *is* the labels. If I don't extract the labels, I am ignoring the PDF text provided for context. This implies the labels *are* important text to extract. Maybe the rule "if the text on the page only makes sense..." applies to *other* text? Or maybe it's a default rule for image-heavy pages, but overridden by "Extract all text"? "Note that erros may occur with the pdf text, if it is obviously corrupted or error ridden text then ignore it !" This suggests I should trust the image OCR more if there's a conflict, but use PDF for context. The PDF text *lists* the labels. This confirms they are considered text on the page. So I will extract them. Let's look at the formatting again. "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." The labels are yellow. The headers "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" are black. So headers are normal, labels are bold. Final plan: 1. Header: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** (Black text, but maybe bold because it's a title? No, rule says "different colour". It's black on white. So normal text? Wait, the prompt says "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" is in the image. It looks black. "W/Prof..." is black. Actually, looking at the very top, "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" is black. So I will not bold it unless I think it's "different colour" from the body? No, "different colour" usually implies distinct from the standard black. The labels are yellow. So they get bold. Wait, the prompt says "try to match the text formatting as much as possible". The labels have a red background box and yellow text. I will use **bold** for the yellow text. 2. Structure: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO [Top Figure Sequence] [Bottom Figure Sequence] 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 46 How to present the sequence? I will list the labels associated with each figure. Top Figure: - **Pre-op** - **RCF - 3 mths** - **6 mths - Review** - **2 yrs - Review** Bottom Figure: - **Pre-operative** - **WL** - **RCF - 18 mths** - **4 yrs - Review** Wait, "Format tables in HTML... flowcharts as tables". The visual arrangement is a flowchart. I will try to represent the top flowchart as a table. Row 1: **Pre-op** (left), **2 yrs - Review** (right) -- wait, 2 yrs is top right. Row 2: **RCF - 3 mths** (left), **6 mths - Review** (right) This works spatially. Bottom flowchart: Row 1: **Pre-operative** (left), **WL** (right) Row 2: **RCF - 18 mths** (left), **4 yrs - Review** (right) This works spatially too. So I will use HTML tables for the text labels to represent the flowchart layout. Wait, "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)". This applies to tables. "and flowcharts as tables as best as possible". So I can use HTML tables for the flowchart parts. But I also have headers and footers. Those are Markdown. So: Header (Markdown) Table (HTML) Table (HTML) Footer (Markdown) Let's check the colors again. "Pre-op" box: Red border/background? It looks like a red rectangle with yellow text. "2 yrs - Review": Red rectangle with yellow text. "RCF - 3 mths": Red rectangle with yellow text. "6 mths - Review": Red rectangle with yellow text. "Pre-operative": Red rectangle with yellow text. "WL": Red rectangle with yellow text. "RCF - 18 mths": Red rectangle with yellow text. "4 yrs - Review": Red rectangle with yellow text. So all the specific stage labels are yellow text in red boxes. The instruction "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold" applies to yellow text. So I will bold all the labels. One distinct thing: "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" is black. "W/Prof..." is black. "2nd Year DMD..." is black. So only the labels are bold. Let's construct the HTML tables. Top Table: <table> <tr><td>**Pre-op**</td><td></td></tr> -- No, 2 yrs is top right. Let's look at the layout. Top Left: Pre-op Bottom Left: RCF - 3 mths Bottom Right: 6 mths - Review Top Right: 2 yrs - Review This is a 2x2 grid essentially. Row 1: Pre-op (Top Left), 2 yrs - Review (Top Right) -- Wait, 2 yrs is physically above the 6 mths image. Yes. So Row 1: **Pre-op**, **2 yrs - Review** Row 2: **RCF - 3 mths**, **6 mths - Review** This matches the visual 2x2 grid. Bottom Table: Top Left: Pre-operative Top Right: WL Bottom Left: RCF - 18 mths Bottom Right: 4 yrs - Review Row 1: **Pre-operative**, **WL** Row 2: **RCF - 18 mths**, **4 yrs - Review** This matches the visual 2x2 grid. This seems like a very good way to follow "flowcharts as tables as best as possible". One detail: The prompt says "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)". This usually means if I output a table, it should be raw HTML, not wrapped in markdown code blocks. And "flowcharts as tables as best as possible" implies I should convert the flowchart images into a text-based table representation. So the structure will be: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO <table>...top figure labels...</table> <table>...bottom figure labels...</table> **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 46 Wait, "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure...". This is the constraint I keep coming back to. If I output the table, am I violating "DO NOT return anything other than a few word description"? The text "Pre-op" is a label. If the *entire page* was just the top figure with "Pre-op" and "2 yrs...", then I would describe it. But the page has headers and footers and two figures. The text "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" gives context. So I am not in the "figure only with sparse text" case. I am in a "document page with figures" case. Therefore, I should extract the text. Let's refine the text extraction. Header: Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2 W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO Top Figure Labels (Yellow/Red boxes): Pre-op 2 yrs - Review RCF - 3 mths 6 mths - Review Bottom Figure Labels (Yellow/Red boxes): Pre-operative WL RCF - 18 mths 4 yrs - Review Footer: 2nd Year DMD - 2023 Page 46 I will format the labels as bold because they are yellow (different color). I will arrange them in HTML tables to represent the flowchart layout. Top Table: | **Pre-op** | | | **RCF - 3 mths** | **6 mths - Review** | | | **2 yrs - Review** | Wait, looking really closely at the top image arrows. Pre-op (top left) -> arrow down/right -> RCF - 3 mths (bottom left). RCF - 3 mths -> arrow right -> 6 mths - Review (bottom right). 6 mths - Review -> arrow up/right -> 2 yrs - Review (top right). So the 2x2 grid layout: Top Left: Pre-op Top Right: 2 yrs - Review Bottom Left: RCF - 3 mths Bottom Right: 6 mths - Review Yes, that works. Bottom Table: Pre-operative (top left) -> arrow right -> WL (top right). WL -> arrow down/left -> RCF - 18 mths (bottom left). RCF - 18 mths -> arrow right -> 4 yrs - Review (bottom right). Layout: Top Left: Pre-operative Top Right: WL Bottom Left: RCF - 18 mths Bottom Right: 4 yrs - Review Yes, that works. So I will use 2x2 tables. One final check on colors. The text "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" is black. The text "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" is black. The text "2nd Year DMD - 2023" is black. The text "Page 46" is black. The text in the boxes is yellow. So I will bold the box text. Wait, is "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" black? Yes. Is "W/Prof..." black? Yes. Is "2nd Year..." black? Yes. Is "Page 46" black? Yes. Okay, ready to generate. One small detail: "RCF - 3 mths" - "mths" is abbreviation for months. "6 mths - Review" "2 yrs - Review" "18 mths" "4 yrs - Review" I will preserve the text exactly as seen. The instruction "Format tables in HTML (only tables NOTHING ELSE!)" suggests that if I use a table, it should be pure HTML. The instruction "flowcharts as tables as best as possible" supports using HTML tables for the layout. What about the graph bars at the bottom left and right of each black box? They are blue and white bars. No text. I will ignore them. Final check on "if the figure is an image only with labels or sparse text then DO NOT return anything other than a few word description of the figure, wrap this figure in tags." This instruction is very specific. "if the figure [is] an image only with labels or sparse text". The top image *is* an image with labels. The bottom image *is* an image with labels. If I treat them individually, I should describe them. BUT, the prompt also says "Extract all of the text from this image". And "use the pdf text for context to enhance the ocr". The PDF text *is* the list of labels. This implies the labels *should* be extracted. Maybe the "sparse text" rule applies to things like "Figure 1" or "A". Here, the text describes the content ("Pre-op", "Review"). So I will extract the text. Also, "try to match the text formatting as much as possible". The headers are large. The labels are in boxes. I will use bold for the labels. Let's write the response. Header: **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** ... W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO (Wait, header is black, so no bold? Or is it a title so bold? "try to match the text formatting". Titles are usually bold or larger. I'll leave it normal text unless it's clearly a different color. It looks black. The labels are yellow. I'll bold the labels.) Actually, looking at the very top line "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2", it looks like standard black font. "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" is black. So I will not bold the header/footer. I will bold the labels because they are yellow. One catch: "if the text is in a different colour then it should be formatted as bold." Does "different colour" mean different from black? Yes. So yellow text -> bold. The HTML tables: <table> <tr><td>**Pre-op**</td><td></td></tr> -- No, let's just put the text in cells. <tr><td>**Pre-op**</td><td>**2 yrs - Review**</td></tr> <tr><td>**RCF - 3 mths**</td><td>**6 mths - Review**</td></tr> </table> This represents the 2x2 layout. Bottom table: <table> <tr><td>**Pre-operative**</td><td>**WL**</td></tr> <tr><td>**RCF - 18 mths**</td><td>**4 yrs - Review**</td></tr> </table> This seems correct. One detail: "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" - "AO" is likely an honorific. "2nd Year DMD - 2023" "Page 46" I will arrange the header left and right. Markdown doesn't support column layout easily without tables. I'll just put them on one line or two lines. "Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2" "W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO" (Maybe separate them by some spaces). Let's check the bottom text. "2nd Year DMD - 2023" (Left) "Page 46" (Right). Okay, I'm ready. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2** W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO <table> <tr> <td><b>Pre-op</b></td> <td><b>2 yrs - Review</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>RCF - 3 mths</b></td> <td><b>6 mths - Review</b></td> </tr> </table> <table> <tr> <td><b>Pre-operative</b></td> <td><b>WL</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td><b>RCF - 18 mths</b></td> <td><b>4 yrs - Review</b></td> </tr> </table> **2nd Year DMD - 2023** Page 46   The following radiographic sequences illustrate the progression of endodontic treatment and healing over time. #### Case Example 1: Treatment Timeline | Stage 1 | Stage 4 | | :--- | :--- | | **Pre-op** | **2 yrs - Review** | | **RCF - 3 mths** | **6 mths - Review** | #### Case Example 2: Treatment Timeline | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | | :--- | :--- | | **Pre-operative** | **WL** | | **RCF - 18 mths** | **4 yrs - Review** | A diagram illustrating a dental treatment timeline using a sequence of four X-rays labeled 'Pre-op', 'RCF - 3 mths', '6 mths - Review', and '2 yrs - Review'. Orange arrows connect the images to show the progression of the procedure, located under the header 'Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2'. A diagram displaying a sequence of dental X-rays for a second case, labeled 'Pre-operative', 'WL', 'RCF - 18 mths', and '4 yrs - Review'. Orange arrows indicate the treatment flow, situated above the footer '2nd Year DMD - 2023'. **Anti-Bacterial Strategies - 2**      **W/Prof. Paul V. Abbott AO** <table> <tr> <td><b>Pre-operative</b></td> <td><b>WL - PCC</b></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><b>3 mths - RCF</b></td> </tr> </table> **2nd Year DMD - 2023**      **Page 47**  #### Case Example 3: Treatment Timeline | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | | :--- | :--- | | **Pre-operative** | **WL - PCC** | | **3 mths - RCF** | | This figure displays a sequence of three dental radiographs illustrating an endodontic treatment process. The images progress from 'Pre-operative' status, through 'WL - PCC' (Working Length - Permanent Coronal Closure), to a follow-up at '3 mths - RCF' (Recurrence of Canal Filling), demonstrating the progression of the treatment. [^1]: Original PDF page 1: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=1|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.1]] [^2]: Original PDF page 2: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=2|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.2]] [^3]: Original PDF page 3: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=3|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.3]] [^4]: Original PDF page 4: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=4|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.4]] [^5]: Original PDF page 5: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=5|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.5]] [^6]: Original PDF page 6: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=6|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.6]] [^7]: Original PDF page 7: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=7|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.7]] [^8]: Original PDF page 8: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=8|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.8]] [^9]: Original PDF page 9: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=9|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.9]] [^10]: Original PDF page 10: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=10|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.10]] [^11]: Original PDF page 11: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=11|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.11]] [^12]: Original PDF page 12: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=12|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.12]] [^13]: Original PDF page 13: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=13|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.13]] [^14]: Original PDF page 14: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=14|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.14]] [^15]: Original PDF page 15: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=15|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.15]] [^16]: Original PDF page 16: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=16|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.16]] [^17]: Original PDF page 17: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=17|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.17]] [^18]: Original PDF page 18: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=18|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.18]] [^19]: Original PDF page 19: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=19|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.19]] [^20]: Original PDF page 20: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=20|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.20]] [^21]: Original PDF page 21: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=21|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.21]] [^22]: Original PDF page 22: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=22|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.22]] [^23]: Original PDF page 23: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=23|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.23]] [^24]: Original PDF page 24: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=24|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.24]] [^25]: Original PDF page 25: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=25|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.25]] [^26]: Original PDF page 26: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=26|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.26]] [^27]: Original PDF page 27: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=27|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.27]] [^28]: Original PDF page 28: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=28|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.28]] [^29]: Original PDF page 29: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=29|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.29]] [^30]: Original PDF page 30: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=30|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.30]] [^31]: Original PDF page 31: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=31|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.31]] [^32]: Original PDF page 32: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=32|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.32]] [^33]: Original PDF page 33: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=33|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.33]] [^34]: Original PDF page 34: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=34|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.34]] [^35]: Original PDF page 35: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=35|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.35]] [^36]: Original PDF page 36: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=36|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.36]] [^37]: Original PDF page 37: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=37|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.37]] [^38]: Original PDF page 38: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=38|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.38]] [^39]: Original PDF page 39: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=39|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.39]] [^40]: Original PDF page 40: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=40|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.40]] [^41]: Original PDF page 41: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=41|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.41]] [^42]: Original PDF page 42: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=42|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.42]] [^43]: Original PDF page 43: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=43|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.43]] [^44]: Original PDF page 44: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=44|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.44]] [^45]: Original PDF page 45: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=45|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.45]] [^46]: Original PDF page 46: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=46|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.46]] [^47]: Original PDF page 47: [[L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout.pdf#page=47|L4 Anti-bacterial Strategies - 2 - Medicaments - 2023 - Handout, p.47]]