Analogue Films and Common Film Faults1

Dr Dayea Oh

OMF Radiologist

Introduction to Intraoral Radiography23

Review of Intra-oral Radiography

Intra-oral Radiography:

  • 2D, diagnostic imaging using ionising radiation (= x-ray beam)
  • Clinical workflow:
    • Film / receptor placed intra-orally → Expose (the film & the patient) with x-ray beam → film processing → diagnostic image production
  • Images are of black (radiolucent), white (radiopaque) and grey ‘shadows’
  • Three types:
    • Bitewing (BW), Periapical (PA) & Occlusal
    • Digital or analogue

Left Posterior Bitewing (BW)

Left Posterior Bitewing (BW)

Learning Objectives4

  • Understand the composition of a general analogue film
  • What is a latent image?
  • How is a latent image processed to form a final image?
  • What are the factors that affect the final image quality?
  • Understand how to assess faulty radiographs

Analogue Film Composition

External Packet Components5

What you’ll see on the outside…

  • Intra-oral film packet
  • Plastic cover → moisture-proof
  • Orientation dot (dot to the mesial)
  • Inner paper wrap / black paper wrap → light-proof
  • Lead foil backing → prevents residual radiation continuing on into patient’s tissues
  • ANALOGUE FILM

Internal Film Structure6

What you can’t see inside…

  • Double emulsion film →
  • Emulsion = where image is recorded
    • Sensitive to x-rays, visible light & UV
    • Double layers (to reduce radiation dosage)
  • Base = film support
    • Clear, transparent plastic
  • Others:
    • Gelatin layer x2 (outer protective layer)
    • Adhesive layer x2 (between base & emulsion)

Fig. 4.3 Diagram showing the cross-sectional structure of double emulsion radiographic film.

Fig. 4.3 Diagram showing the cross-sectional structure of double emulsion radiographic film.

Emulsion Components7

Emulsion

  • Main components:
    • Silver halide crystals (or grains) → sensitive to x-ray photons!
    • Mostly silver bromide (Ag-Br) crystals →
    • Vehicle / Gelatin matrix
      • Suspends silver halide crystals
      • Allows efficient chemical processing
    • Overcoat
      • To protect from damage eg. Scratch

Latent Image Formation8

  • = exposed film → CHEMICAL change in film emulsion after x-ray exposure

Silver bromide (Ag-Br) crystals in the emulsion layer have:

  • Free silver ions (positively charged) and;
  • Sulfur compounds aka ‘sensitivity site’ (SS)

Irradiated silver bromide release electrons and bind to ‘SS’

  • SS become negatively charged
  • Free silver ions are attracted to negatively charged SS to form neutral silver atom

Remember – only IRRADIATED (EXPOSED) Ag-Br crystals form latent image

Photon (wave shown) Ag (atom symbol) Br (atom symbol) e- (electron symbol) SS (sensitivity site shown as cloud) Br—Ag—Br Br—Ag+—Br Br Br—Ag—Br Ag—Ag Ag Ag—Br—Ag—Br—Ag—Br—Ag

* Remember – only IRRADIATED (EXPOSED) Ag-Br crystals form latent image

Chemical Processing Steps9

Latent Image to Final (Visible) Image

  • Processing tank (stainless steel)

  • CHEMICAL PROCESSING (4 steps)

    1. Developing solution
    2. Water
    3. Fixing solution
    4. Water & Dry & Mount
  • Other requirements:

    • Timer
    • Dry zone / area
    • Lightproof → ‘safelight’ Red GXB-2 filter (7.5-15W bulb)
    • Humidity → 50-70% relative humidity
    • Temperature → 20-25°C (room temp)

Developing Process10

Chemical Processing – 1. Developing

  • Target: latent image / exposed silver halide crystals
  • Chemicals used:
    • Phenidone – converts latent image to metallic silver grains via oxidation
    • Hydroquinone – reduces oxidated phenidone to help continuing its action
    • Sodium sulphite (antioxidant preservative)
    • Potassium carbonate (activator)
      • Maintains alkaline environment (developers need pH ~10)
      • Swells gelatin layer to let developing agents to diffuse more readily
    • Benzotriazole (restrainer)
      • Restrains developing unexposed Ag-Br crystals → reduces image fogging
    • Glutaraldehyde
    • Fungicide
    • Water
  • Duration: 3-6 minutes (depending on the temperature)

Rinsing Process11

Chemical Processing – 2. Rinsing

  • Rinse the film in water with gentle agitation
  • To:
    • Prevent over-developing
      • Over-developed images = dark final image (film fog)
    • Buffer to neutral pH
  • Duration: 20-30 seconds

Fixing Process12

Chemical Processing – 3. Fixing

  • Target = unexposed silver halide crystals

Chemicals used:

  • Ammonium thiosulphate – removes/dissolves unexposed silver halide crystals

  • Sodium sulphate (preservative)

  • Aluminium chloride (hardener)

    • Reduces swelling of the gelatin from subsequent handling
  • Acetic acid (acidifier)

    • Maintains acidic environment (pH 4-4.5) for the fixer
    • Inactivates residual developing solution, if any
  • Duration: 8-10 minutes

Final Rinsing and Drying1314

Chemical Processing – 4. Final Rinsing

  • Rinse in water (in bath + under running water)
  • To:
    • Prevent over-fixing
      • Over-fixing causes light image
    • Remove all the silver thiosulfate complexes (they cause fixer stains = obvious radiopaque areas on the final image)
graph TD
    A[Unexposed film & Ag-Br] --> B[Only exposed Ag-Br form latent image]
    B --> C["Latent image become real image (image at this stage has fogging due to presence of remaining unexposed Ag-Br)"]
    C --> D[After fixing \(final image\)]

Darkroom Protocols and Automation

Daily Start-up Protocol15

Darkroom Daily Start-up Protocol

  • Clean & dry benches
  • Check safelight & check for any light leaks
  • Check chemical solutions (developers & fixers)
    • Check the volume & temperature
    • Stir to equalise the temperature throughout the tanks
  • Step-wedge test (mainly to test developer)
    • Compare daily ‘test film’ with initial ‘reference film’
      • Reference film = processed film when developer & fixer were newly replenished / replaced
    • When an optical difference is noted, all chemicals need replacement
  • Weekly clearing time test (fixer efficacy)
    • Measure time taken to remove all silver halide crystals (unexposed film)
      • Ideal = 8-10 min (at room temperature ~ 25°C)
      • Replace fixer if the clearing time doubles

Automatic Processing Systems1617

Automatic Processing

  • Manual processing can take up to >10 min.
  • Compact ‘darkroom’ unit
    • No need for a separate dedicated darkroom
  • Fast process
    • Passes successively through the developer -> fixer -> water -> and drier (usually 5 min)
    • High concentration of hydroquinone in developing solution
    • Often, inadequately rinsed -> discolouration
graph TD
    A[Film entry] --> B[Developing solution]
    B --> C[Fixing solution]
    C --> D[Water wash]
    D --> E[Drying elements]
    E --> F[Film exit]
AB

Film Viewing and Storage1819

Analogue Film Viewing

  • Mount ONLY DRY films
  • Check orientation
  • Mandatory information on mounted films:
    • Patient detail (name, gender, DOB)
    • Date of exposure
    • Type of film
    • Institution / address of practice
    • Exposure details (if possible)
  • Light box

Film Storage

  • Medicolegally, all films must be kept for 7 years*

    • If child, for 7 years after turning 18 years old
  • Stored in a cool, dry place

  • Check AHPRA / ARPANSA / Radiation Health (in QLD) annually for any change

Analogue Film Viewing

Radiographic Film Faults20

Common Film Faults

Processing and Handling Errors21

  • Processing Errors - I
  • Light exposure in darkroom
    • Dark image = light leak into the darkroom
    • Film fogging (poor contrast, dark image) = prolonged exposure to safelight
  • Poor handling
    • Fingerprints
    • Nails
    • Bent films
  • Developing errors
    • Over-development → dark image
    • Under-development → light image
    • Contaminated film with developer before processing → black spots

The provided text is an order of operations for handling images and text:

Image Rules22

  • Image Only: If the figure is an image with only labels or sparse text, output ONLY a brief 2-5 word description wrapped in “ tags.
  • Image Context: If the text on the page only makes sense in the context of a figure or image (labels, names with no context), treat the whole page as a figure: wrap a single brief description in “ tags and output NOTHING ELSE.
  • Constraints: NEVER output image descriptions as plain text outside of tags, and NEVER output standard HTML image tags (<img src="...">), nor wrapper tags like <div> or <figure>.

Text Rules

  • Extract all text and prioritize image text, using PDF text to resolve ambiguities.
  • Format bold text using bolding.
  • Ignore obviously corrupted text.
  • Format tables in HTML (only tables, nothing else).
  • Format flowcharts as tables.

The input consists of six dental radiographs without any accompanying labels. Therefore, applying the Counting the Text and Image Rules, the appropriate response is a brief description of the entire figure containing the dental X-rays.

Fixing Errors23

  • Over-fixing → light image (or clear)
  • Under-fixing → dark image
  • Contaminated film with fixer before processing → white / clear spots
  • Film in fixer before developer → clear image

Rinsing Errors

  • Inadequate rinsing → Brown image (usually from fixer staining)
  • Over-rinsing → emulsion peel, i.e., no image
  • Exposure setting errors
    • Underexposure → light image
      • Insufficient mA
      • Insufficient kVp
      • Insufficient time
      • Long film-source distance
      • Film reversed in mouth
    • Overexposure → dark image
      • Excessive mA
      • Excessive kVp
      • Excessive time
  • Beam misalignment → Cone-cutting (partial image)

Causes of Faded or Washed Out Images

Positive-Fading or Washed Out (Fig. 5-34)26

Causes in Exposure Factors
  • Incorrectly installed long-focus cone tip
  • Film-source distance is too far
  • Excessive kVp
  • Power-failure during exposure
  • Not using film cassette or trouble with cassette (bending)
Causes in Processing
  • Improper time-temperature setting for development (too cool)
  • High concentration of developer solution
  • Stale developer solution
  • New and fresh fixer solution
  • Failure to fix (insufficient time in fixer)
  • Developer has not reached the film during processing
  • In prolonged processing, the film was agitated too little

Negative-Fading or Densification (Fig. 5-35)

  • Insufficient time

  • Insufficient current (mA)?

  • Insufficient kVp

  • Power-failure during exposure

  • Not using film cassette or trouble with cassette (bending)

  • Inadequate or old developer solution

  • Excessive development time for solution temperature

  • Old fixer solution

  • In new film processing, insufficient agitation time of the developer

White Blends (Fig. 5-36)

Cause in Exposure Factors
  • Improperly exposed or old double emulsion X-ray films
  • Film brought into contact with fluorescent lamps
Cause in Processing
  • Improper time-temperature setting for development (too cool)
  • Undiluted or insufficiently diluted developer solution
  • Stale developer solution
  • Improper film sorting class
  • Improper storage of films in humid or hot conditions

Radiation (Fig. 5-37)

  • Wrong focal length for the case

  • X-ray tube malfunction

  • Long exposure time (usually not more than 12 seconds)

  • Not enough kVp

  • Failure of the X-ray machine

  • Improper time-temperature setting for development (too cool)

  • Long development time

  • Too much agitation

  • Inadequate or old developer solution

  • Improper film sorting class

  • Operator’s overexposure of the film (excessive-dose)

  • Operator’s underexposure of the film (insufficient-dose)

  • Failure of the X-ray machine

Dusty Spots (Fig. 5-38)

  • External objects in the field of the beam
  • Operator’s overexposure of the film (excessive-dose)

Radioactivity (Fig. 5-39)

  • Kernel of radioactive element in the film

Chair, Acetone, and Oil (Fig. 5-40)

  • Overly dense areas in the film
  • Operator’s overexposure of the film (excessive-dose)

Handlers Hallmarks (Fig. 5-41)

  • Operator’s overexposure of the film (excessive-dose)

Bibliography27

Fifth Edition Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology Eric Whaites, Nicholas Drage CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE ELSEVIER

ORAL RADIOLOGY Principles and Interpretation Edition 7 Stuart C. White, Michael J. Pharoah ELSEVIER

Footnotes

  1. Original PDF page 1: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.1

  2. Original PDF page 2: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.2

  3. Original PDF page 3: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.3

  4. Original PDF page 4: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.4

  5. Original PDF page 5: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.5

  6. Original PDF page 6: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.6

  7. Original PDF page 7: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.7

  8. Original PDF page 8: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.8

  9. Original PDF page 9: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.9

  10. Original PDF page 10: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.10

  11. Original PDF page 11: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.11

  12. Original PDF page 12: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.12

  13. Original PDF page 13: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.13

  14. Original PDF page 14: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.14

  15. Original PDF page 15: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.15

  16. Original PDF page 16: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.16

  17. Original PDF page 17: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.17

  18. Original PDF page 18: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.18

  19. Original PDF page 19: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.19

  20. Original PDF page 20: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.20

  21. Original PDF page 21: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.21

  22. Original PDF page 22: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.22

  23. Original PDF page 23: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.23

  24. Original PDF page 24: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.24

  25. Original PDF page 25: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.25

  26. Original PDF page 26: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.26

  27. Original PDF page 27: L3 Analogue Films & Film Faults, p.27